Bireyselleştirilmiş Çok Aşamalı Testlerde Test Tasarımının Yanlış Yönlendirmeye Etkisi

Mahmut Sami YİĞİTER, Nuri DOĞAN
{"title":"Bireyselleştirilmiş Çok Aşamalı Testlerde Test Tasarımının Yanlış Yönlendirmeye Etkisi","authors":"Mahmut Sami YİĞİTER, Nuri DOĞAN","doi":"10.46778/goputeb.1267319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Computerized Multistage Testing (MST) is an adaptive testing approach in which the test taker completes stages and modules on a pre-assembled panel according to his/her ability level. In MST, the test taker is routed to a module in the following stage based on his/her responses to the module in each stage. The test taker is expected to be routed to the module that fits his/her ability level best in the following stages. If the test taker is not routed to the module appropriate to his/her ability level, misrouting can be mentioned. Misrouting is thought to affect both measurement accuracy and the test taker's psychology. Although it is very difficult to completely eliminate misrouting, it is assumed that it can be reduced with the basic components of the MST design. The purpose of this study is to determine the level of misrouting according to different MST designs and to investigate the effects of changes in test design on the level of misrouting. The main components that are considered to affect misrouting are the MST test design [1-3, 1-2-3, 1-3-3], routing module design [Wide, Narrow], test length [12, 24, 36] and module length [L-S, M-M, S-L]. This study, which aims to reveal the current situation, is descriptive research and it was carried out by simulation method. The results of the study show that MST design and components can be effective in reducing misrouting. Three-stage MST designs offer lower misrouting and higher measurement accuracy than two-stage MST designs. Furthermore, increasing the test length and designing the routing module with a wide range of abilities reduce the misrouting rate. According to the measurement accuracy results, it can be stated that misrouting is not a significant problem in the MST in general, although the measurement accuracy of the misrouted test takers is low. It was concluded that the ability levels of the misrouted test takers were generally concentrated at the intersection points of the module information functions of the adjacent modules and generally in the middle of the ability scale.","PeriodicalId":312663,"journal":{"name":"Uluslararası Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi","volume":"17 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Uluslararası Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46778/goputeb.1267319","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Computerized Multistage Testing (MST) is an adaptive testing approach in which the test taker completes stages and modules on a pre-assembled panel according to his/her ability level. In MST, the test taker is routed to a module in the following stage based on his/her responses to the module in each stage. The test taker is expected to be routed to the module that fits his/her ability level best in the following stages. If the test taker is not routed to the module appropriate to his/her ability level, misrouting can be mentioned. Misrouting is thought to affect both measurement accuracy and the test taker's psychology. Although it is very difficult to completely eliminate misrouting, it is assumed that it can be reduced with the basic components of the MST design. The purpose of this study is to determine the level of misrouting according to different MST designs and to investigate the effects of changes in test design on the level of misrouting. The main components that are considered to affect misrouting are the MST test design [1-3, 1-2-3, 1-3-3], routing module design [Wide, Narrow], test length [12, 24, 36] and module length [L-S, M-M, S-L]. This study, which aims to reveal the current situation, is descriptive research and it was carried out by simulation method. The results of the study show that MST design and components can be effective in reducing misrouting. Three-stage MST designs offer lower misrouting and higher measurement accuracy than two-stage MST designs. Furthermore, increasing the test length and designing the routing module with a wide range of abilities reduce the misrouting rate. According to the measurement accuracy results, it can be stated that misrouting is not a significant problem in the MST in general, although the measurement accuracy of the misrouted test takers is low. It was concluded that the ability levels of the misrouted test takers were generally concentrated at the intersection points of the module information functions of the adjacent modules and generally in the middle of the ability scale.
测试设计对个性化多阶段测试误导的影响
计算机化多阶段测试(MST)是一种自适应测试方法,考生根据自己的能力水平完成预组装板上的阶段和模块。在MST中,考生将根据他/她对每个阶段模块的反应被路由到下一个阶段的模块。在接下来的几个阶段,考生将被安排到最适合他/她能力水平的模块。如果考生没有被安排到适合他/她能力水平的模块,可以提到错误的安排。错误的路线被认为会影响测量的准确性和测试者的心理。虽然完全消除错路由是非常困难的,但假设它可以通过MST设计的基本组件来减少。本研究的目的是根据不同的MST设计来确定错路由的水平,并调查测试设计的变化对错路由水平的影响。考虑影响错路由的主要因素是MST测试设计[1- 3,1-2-3,1-3-3],路由模块设计[Wide, Narrow],测试长度[12,24,36]和模块长度[L-S, M-M, S-L]。本研究是描述性研究,旨在揭示现状,采用模拟方法进行。研究结果表明,MST设计和组件可以有效地减少错路由。与两级MST设计相比,三级MST设计提供更低的错误路由和更高的测量精度。此外,增加测试长度和设计具有广泛能力的路由模块可以降低错路由率。根据测量精度结果,可以看出,虽然错误路由的考生的测量精度很低,但在MST中,错误路由总体上不是一个显著的问题。结果表明,错路考生的能力水平总体上集中在相邻模块信息功能模块的交叉点,总体上处于能力量表的中间位置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信