Comparative analysis of image quality parameters and spatial resolution of three Small Animal PET scanner in Brazil

Rodrigo Modesto Gadelha Gontijo, Andréa Vidal Ferreira, Daniele Faria, Carlos Alberto Buchpiguel, Samuel Greggio, Gianina Venturin, Jader Costa, Juliana Silva, Marcelo Mamede
{"title":"Comparative analysis of image quality parameters and spatial resolution of three Small Animal PET scanner in Brazil","authors":"Rodrigo Modesto Gadelha Gontijo, Andréa Vidal Ferreira, Daniele Faria, Carlos Alberto Buchpiguel, Samuel Greggio, Gianina Venturin, Jader Costa, Juliana Silva, Marcelo Mamede","doi":"10.15392/2319-0612.2023.2306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study evaluated Image Quality (IQ) parameters and spatial resolution (SR) of Triumph® LabPET systems installed in three different Brazilian preclinical molecular imaging centers. A comprehensive evaluation of the PET scanner intrinsic parameters is important to optimize the acquired images, providing more reliable qualitative and quantitative analyses. Experiments were carried out at the centers: C1 - Molecular Imaging Laboratory of the CDTN/CNEN; C2 - Laboratory of Nuclear Medicine of HCFMUSP; C3 - Preclinical Research Center of the Brain Institute at PUC-RS. IQ phantom PET images were acquired as recommended in NEMA NU 4-2008 standard. Image reconstructions were performed in each system using the same reconstruction protocol. Data was processed using PMOD® software. The IQ parameters: (i) uniformity, (ii) spill-over ratio (SOR) and (iii) recovery coefficients (RC) were evaluated and compared. For Uniformity test, the percentage standard deviations of mean activity concentration were 7.8%; 7.3% and 6.4% for Centers 1, 2 and 3 respectively. Cold chambers RSO values in the systems 1, 2 and 3 were respectively 0.16, 0.19 and 0.21 for water; 0.26; 0.28 and 0.30 for air. The RC’s for rod diameters from 1 to 5 mm ranged from 0.08 to 0.91 for the three centers. Results revealed that the three PET systems have appropriate quality parameters for pre-clinical studies, presenting values compatible with international standards. This study was able to reveals the performance of preclinical PET system of different Brazilian imaging centers and may support the standardization of a National Quality Control Program for Small Animal PET scanners.","PeriodicalId":9203,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Radiation Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Radiation Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15392/2319-0612.2023.2306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluated Image Quality (IQ) parameters and spatial resolution (SR) of Triumph® LabPET systems installed in three different Brazilian preclinical molecular imaging centers. A comprehensive evaluation of the PET scanner intrinsic parameters is important to optimize the acquired images, providing more reliable qualitative and quantitative analyses. Experiments were carried out at the centers: C1 - Molecular Imaging Laboratory of the CDTN/CNEN; C2 - Laboratory of Nuclear Medicine of HCFMUSP; C3 - Preclinical Research Center of the Brain Institute at PUC-RS. IQ phantom PET images were acquired as recommended in NEMA NU 4-2008 standard. Image reconstructions were performed in each system using the same reconstruction protocol. Data was processed using PMOD® software. The IQ parameters: (i) uniformity, (ii) spill-over ratio (SOR) and (iii) recovery coefficients (RC) were evaluated and compared. For Uniformity test, the percentage standard deviations of mean activity concentration were 7.8%; 7.3% and 6.4% for Centers 1, 2 and 3 respectively. Cold chambers RSO values in the systems 1, 2 and 3 were respectively 0.16, 0.19 and 0.21 for water; 0.26; 0.28 and 0.30 for air. The RC’s for rod diameters from 1 to 5 mm ranged from 0.08 to 0.91 for the three centers. Results revealed that the three PET systems have appropriate quality parameters for pre-clinical studies, presenting values compatible with international standards. This study was able to reveals the performance of preclinical PET system of different Brazilian imaging centers and may support the standardization of a National Quality Control Program for Small Animal PET scanners.
巴西三台小动物PET扫描仪图像质量参数与空间分辨率的对比分析
本研究评估了安装在巴西三个不同的临床前分子成像中心的Triumph®LabPET系统的图像质量(IQ)参数和空间分辨率(SR)。全面评估PET扫描仪的内在参数对于优化获得的图像,提供更可靠的定性和定量分析是很重要的。实验在以下中心进行:C1 - CDTN/CNEN分子成像实验室;C2 - HCFMUSP核医学实验室;C3 -临床前研究中心脑科学研究所。IQ幻影PET图像是按照NEMA NU 4-2008标准的建议获取的。在每个系统中使用相同的重建协议进行图像重建。数据处理采用PMOD®软件。对IQ参数(i)均匀性、(ii)溢出比(SOR)和(iii)恢复系数(RC)进行评价和比较。均匀性检验,平均活性浓度的百分比标准差为7.8%;1、2、3中心分别为7.3%和6.4%。系统1、系统2和系统3的冷室RSO值分别为0.16、0.19和0.21;0.26;0.28和0.30空气。杆直径从1到5毫米的RC的范围从0.08到0.91的三个中心。结果表明,这三种PET系统具有适合临床前研究的质量参数,其值与国际标准相一致。这项研究能够揭示不同巴西成像中心的临床前PET系统的性能,并可能支持小动物PET扫描仪国家质量控制计划的标准化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信