Protocolo anestésico em cão submetido à enucleação para correção de prolapso do globo ocular – relato de caso

Ana Cláudia Rodrigues Silva, Angela dos Santos Delmachio, Renilton Araújo Santos, Rosa Maria Keffler Wagmocher, Wâyni Barboza Teixeira, Jomel Francisco dos Santos, Luiz Donizete Campeiro Junior
{"title":"Protocolo anestésico em cão submetido à enucleação para correção de prolapso do globo ocular – relato de caso","authors":"Ana Cláudia Rodrigues Silva, Angela dos Santos Delmachio, Renilton Araújo Santos, Rosa Maria Keffler Wagmocher, Wâyni Barboza Teixeira, Jomel Francisco dos Santos, Luiz Donizete Campeiro Junior","doi":"10.32406/v6n4/2023/31-37/agrariacad","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Orbital injuries are common in dogs, resulting from mechanical trauma or orbital diseases that may or may not be considered emergencies, characterized as an ocular protrusion that in extreme cases will require a surgical procedure for the extraction of the eyeball through enucleation, for this procedure, it is necessary to adopt specific and individual anesthetic protocols for each patient, since each situation may have different characteristics and the adoption of anesthetic drugs may lead to cardiovascular and respiratory changes when the appropriate procedures and medications are not adopted, in this case. In this context, the study aimed to evaluate the anesthetic protocol in a dog submitted to a surgical procedure of enucleation to correct an eyeball prolapse, using pre-anesthetic medication. Dosages of propofol 3 mg/kg IV, midazolam 0.4 mg/kg IV and morphine 0.5 mg/kg IV did not cause adverse effects such as changes in heart and respiratory rates and/or vomiting. The surgical and anesthetic procedure adopted for that patient had a positive effect, it is inferred that this factor is associated with rapid intervention, therapeutic choice and administration dosages, contributed to the final result of the case.","PeriodicalId":472080,"journal":{"name":"Revista Agrária Acadêmica","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Agrária Acadêmica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32406/v6n4/2023/31-37/agrariacad","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Orbital injuries are common in dogs, resulting from mechanical trauma or orbital diseases that may or may not be considered emergencies, characterized as an ocular protrusion that in extreme cases will require a surgical procedure for the extraction of the eyeball through enucleation, for this procedure, it is necessary to adopt specific and individual anesthetic protocols for each patient, since each situation may have different characteristics and the adoption of anesthetic drugs may lead to cardiovascular and respiratory changes when the appropriate procedures and medications are not adopted, in this case. In this context, the study aimed to evaluate the anesthetic protocol in a dog submitted to a surgical procedure of enucleation to correct an eyeball prolapse, using pre-anesthetic medication. Dosages of propofol 3 mg/kg IV, midazolam 0.4 mg/kg IV and morphine 0.5 mg/kg IV did not cause adverse effects such as changes in heart and respiratory rates and/or vomiting. The surgical and anesthetic procedure adopted for that patient had a positive effect, it is inferred that this factor is associated with rapid intervention, therapeutic choice and administration dosages, contributed to the final result of the case.
狗摘除矫正眼球脱垂的麻醉方案-病例报告
眼窝损伤在狗身上很常见,是由机械性创伤或眼窝疾病引起的,可能被视为紧急情况,也可能不被视为紧急情况,其特征是眼球突出,在极端情况下,需要进行手术,通过剜出眼球,对于这一手术,有必要为每个病人采用特定的和单独的麻醉方案。由于每种情况可能有不同的特点,并且在本病例中,如果不采用适当的程序和药物,麻醉药物的使用可能导致心血管和呼吸系统的变化。在此背景下,本研究旨在评估麻醉方案的狗提交的眼球脱垂手术摘除术,使用麻醉前药物。异丙酚3mg /kg IV、咪达唑仑0.4 mg/kg IV和吗啡0.5 mg/kg IV的剂量未引起心脏和呼吸速率变化和/或呕吐等不良反应。该患者所采用的手术和麻醉程序有积极的效果,推断这一因素与快速干预、治疗选择和给药剂量有关,有助于该病例的最终结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信