Retinopathy of Prematurity: Risk Factors, Recent Trends of Screening and Outcome of Treatment in a Tertiary Care Eye Hospital of Bangladesh

Ul Kadir Syeed Mehbub
{"title":"Retinopathy of Prematurity: Risk Factors, Recent Trends of Screening and Outcome of Treatment in a Tertiary Care Eye Hospital of Bangladesh","authors":"Ul Kadir Syeed Mehbub","doi":"10.23880/oajo-16000271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To determine the associated risk factors, current methods of screening and treatment outcome of ROP in a tertiarylevel eye hospital in Bangladesh. Methods: A prospective longitudinal study was conducted in the OPD, Pediatric care unit of a tertiary eye hospital, among 167 babies from October 2014 to June 2019. The initial examination was done either at four weeks of birth or 31 weeks post-conceptually, whichever was earlier. After taking consent, a detailed history was taken. Before the fundus examination, mydriasis was achieved, and indirect ophthalmoscopy was done under topical anesthesia. In favorable cases, staging of ROP was done with subsequent follow-up. As per ETROP indication, either laser photocoagulation or anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injection or both were given for treatment. Later these babies were followed up to see the outcome. Results: Out of 167 babies, we had two groups after the 1st screening; 76 babies (45.5%) fell in the ROP group and 91 babies in the No ROP group. On subsequent screening, 28 babies had spontaneously regressed ROP, leaving 48 in the ROP group who required treatment. The male gender was predominant in both groups (52.6% and 56.04%, respectively). Type 1 ROP was the most prevalent. Oxygen therapy (93.4%) of variable duration and neonatal jaundice (52.6%) were the top two risk factors of ROP in this study. Sixty-five babies (38.9%) fell into a group of birth weight 1000-1500 grams, and 81 (48.5%) had a gestational age of 28-32 weeks. As a treatment, the majority with ROP (21 cases) received laser therapy. In the final follow-up, refractive errors are the most common outcome after treatment of ROP. Conclusion: The available care for ROP varies, and visual disability is mainly preventable when detected and treated in time. With limited resources and expertise, the screening and treatment of ROP implemented in Bangladesh showed some satisfactory outcomes; a longer follow-up would give a more detailed evaluation of the impact of this treatment on the visual status.","PeriodicalId":91939,"journal":{"name":"Open access journal of ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open access journal of ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23880/oajo-16000271","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the associated risk factors, current methods of screening and treatment outcome of ROP in a tertiarylevel eye hospital in Bangladesh. Methods: A prospective longitudinal study was conducted in the OPD, Pediatric care unit of a tertiary eye hospital, among 167 babies from October 2014 to June 2019. The initial examination was done either at four weeks of birth or 31 weeks post-conceptually, whichever was earlier. After taking consent, a detailed history was taken. Before the fundus examination, mydriasis was achieved, and indirect ophthalmoscopy was done under topical anesthesia. In favorable cases, staging of ROP was done with subsequent follow-up. As per ETROP indication, either laser photocoagulation or anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injection or both were given for treatment. Later these babies were followed up to see the outcome. Results: Out of 167 babies, we had two groups after the 1st screening; 76 babies (45.5%) fell in the ROP group and 91 babies in the No ROP group. On subsequent screening, 28 babies had spontaneously regressed ROP, leaving 48 in the ROP group who required treatment. The male gender was predominant in both groups (52.6% and 56.04%, respectively). Type 1 ROP was the most prevalent. Oxygen therapy (93.4%) of variable duration and neonatal jaundice (52.6%) were the top two risk factors of ROP in this study. Sixty-five babies (38.9%) fell into a group of birth weight 1000-1500 grams, and 81 (48.5%) had a gestational age of 28-32 weeks. As a treatment, the majority with ROP (21 cases) received laser therapy. In the final follow-up, refractive errors are the most common outcome after treatment of ROP. Conclusion: The available care for ROP varies, and visual disability is mainly preventable when detected and treated in time. With limited resources and expertise, the screening and treatment of ROP implemented in Bangladesh showed some satisfactory outcomes; a longer follow-up would give a more detailed evaluation of the impact of this treatment on the visual status.
早产儿视网膜病变:危险因素、筛查的最新趋势和孟加拉国三级保健眼科医院的治疗结果
目的:确定孟加拉国一家三级眼科医院ROP的相关危险因素、目前筛查方法和治疗结果。方法:对2014年10月至2019年6月在某三级眼科医院儿科护理科门诊就诊的167名婴儿进行前瞻性纵向研究。最初的检查是在婴儿出生四周或怀孕后31周进行的,以较早者为准。征得同意后,详细记录病史。眼底检查前瞳孔散开,在表面麻醉下间接检眼。在有利的病例中,通过后续随访对ROP进行分期。根据ETROP指征,激光光凝或抗血管内皮生长因子(anti-VEGF)注射或两者均给予治疗。随后,这些婴儿被跟踪观察结果。结果:167名婴儿中,第一次筛查后分为两组;ROP组76名婴儿(45.5%)下降,No ROP组91名婴儿下降。在随后的筛查中,28名婴儿的ROP自发消退,剩下48名需要治疗的ROP组。两组均以男性为主,分别为52.6%和56.04%。1型ROP最为常见。不同时间氧疗(93.4%)和新生儿黄疸(52.6%)是本研究中发生ROP的前两大危险因素。出生体重1000 ~ 1500克组65例(38.9%),胎龄28 ~ 32周组81例(48.5%)。作为一种治疗方法,大多数ROP(21例)接受激光治疗。在最后的随访中,屈光不正是ROP治疗后最常见的结果。结论:ROP可采取的护理措施多种多样,及时发现和治疗可预防视力障碍。在资源和专业知识有限的情况下,孟加拉国实施的ROP筛查和治疗取得了一些令人满意的结果;更长时间的随访可以更详细地评估这种治疗对视力状况的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信