Instructional leadership scale for high school principals: Development and validation

IF 2.7 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Hsieh-Chih Lai, Hsin-Yi Lien
{"title":"Instructional leadership scale for high school principals: Development and validation","authors":"Hsieh-Chih Lai, Hsin-Yi Lien","doi":"10.1177/17411432231177531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Principal instructional leadership (PIL) refers to the management of school curriculum, instruction, and assessment by the principal of a school. It is essential to measure the extent of the instructional leadership provided by principals and to propose means of improving instructional leadership. The principal instructional leadership scale (PILS) has been put forward to achieve these goals. In the current study, we validated the PILS on a sample of Taiwanese teachers using a multilevel approach involving expert reviews and three studies. Following two stages in confirmation of content validity by 20 experts, the initial 30-item PILS with five core concepts was subjected to discrimination analysis, exploratory factor analysis, and internal consistency reliability analysis utilizing SPSS 13.0 for Windows and AMOS 22.0 ( n = 339). This resulted in the deletion of nine items. In the second study, the individual item reliability of the remaining 21 items was examined, and the composite reliability, convergent validity, and discriminant validity confirmed the selection of the optimal model ( n = 672). The results of the third study ( n = 1438) supported metric invariance, scalar invariance, and factor variance-covariance invariance and confirmed scalar measurement invariance across genders. Finally, cross-validation analysis verified that the scale was stable and well-constructed.","PeriodicalId":47885,"journal":{"name":"Educational Management Administration & Leadership","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Management Administration & Leadership","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432231177531","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Principal instructional leadership (PIL) refers to the management of school curriculum, instruction, and assessment by the principal of a school. It is essential to measure the extent of the instructional leadership provided by principals and to propose means of improving instructional leadership. The principal instructional leadership scale (PILS) has been put forward to achieve these goals. In the current study, we validated the PILS on a sample of Taiwanese teachers using a multilevel approach involving expert reviews and three studies. Following two stages in confirmation of content validity by 20 experts, the initial 30-item PILS with five core concepts was subjected to discrimination analysis, exploratory factor analysis, and internal consistency reliability analysis utilizing SPSS 13.0 for Windows and AMOS 22.0 ( n = 339). This resulted in the deletion of nine items. In the second study, the individual item reliability of the remaining 21 items was examined, and the composite reliability, convergent validity, and discriminant validity confirmed the selection of the optimal model ( n = 672). The results of the third study ( n = 1438) supported metric invariance, scalar invariance, and factor variance-covariance invariance and confirmed scalar measurement invariance across genders. Finally, cross-validation analysis verified that the scale was stable and well-constructed.
高中校长教学领导能力量表:开发与验证
校长教学领导(PIL)是指学校校长对学校课程、教学、评价的管理。衡量校长教学领导的程度,提出提高校长教学领导的方法是十分必要的。校长教学领导量表(PILS)就是为了实现这些目标而提出的。在本研究中,我们以台湾教师为样本,采用专家评鉴和三项研究的多层次方法来验证该策略。在20位专家进行了两个阶段的内容效度确认后,采用SPSS 13.0 for Windows和AMOS 22.0对最初的包含5个核心概念的30个项目的PILS进行了判别分析、探索性因子分析和内部一致性信度分析(n = 339)。这导致删除了9个项目。在第二项研究中,对剩余的21项进行了单项信度检验,并通过复合信度、收敛效度和区别效度证实了最优模型的选择(n = 672)。第三项研究(n = 1438)的结果支持度量不变性、标量不变性和因子方差-协方差不变性,并证实标量测量不变性。最后通过交叉验证分析,验证了量表的稳定性和结构合理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Educational Management Administration & Leadership
Educational Management Administration & Leadership EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
19.40%
发文量
63
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信