{"title":"Role of albumin-induced volume expansion therapy for cerebral vasospasm in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A systematic review","authors":"Arshad Ali, Arun Babu Rajeswaran, Nisar Shaikh, Ghaya Al-Rumaihi, Ghanem Al-Sulaiti","doi":"10.25259/jnrp_372_2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: This study reviews the effect of albumin-induced volume expansion therapy on symptomatic vasospasm and clinical outcome in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). Materials and Methods: Computer searches carried out from the Scopus, Medline, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and Internet documents; hand searching of medical journals; and review of reference lists. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) and observational studies (OSs) comparing albumin therapy in combination or alone with crystalloid therapy for the treatment of cerebral vasospasm in aSAH were included in the study. Risk-of-bias assessment was conducted using ROB2.0 and ROBINS-I tools for RCTs and Oss, respectively. Results: Out of a total of 1078 searches, one RCT (published in two articles) and one observational (retrospective) study were included for final analysis. In RCT, albumin was used for volume expansion therapy with a baseline crystalloid regime and comparison made between hypervolemic and normovolemic groups and it showed no beneficial effects on symptomatic vasospasm and clinical outcomes based on the Glasgow outcome scale. Furthermore, the use of albumin showed a tendency for sodium retention with lowering of glomerular filtration rate, limiting the amount of total fluid required for targeted central venous pressure values, and thereby avoiding fluid overload manifestations. The retrospective study results between albumin versus non-albumin groups (crystalloids only) supported improved outcomes in the former group with lower in-hospital mortality. Cardiorespiratory complications were equivocal in RCT and increased in non-albumin group in the retrospective study. Risk-of-bias assessment analyses revealed “some concerns” in RCT and “serious” limitation in OS due to its retrospective design. Conclusion: Albumin-induced volume expansion therapy for cerebral vasospasm does not have substantiative evidence to improve cerebral vasospasm and clinical outcomes in aSAH. Studies with well-designed RCTs are required to compare the use of albumin for volume expansion therapy versus standard fluid management using crystalloids to mitigate the scarcity of published data.","PeriodicalId":16443,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurosciences in Rural Practice","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurosciences in Rural Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/jnrp_372_2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: This study reviews the effect of albumin-induced volume expansion therapy on symptomatic vasospasm and clinical outcome in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). Materials and Methods: Computer searches carried out from the Scopus, Medline, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and Internet documents; hand searching of medical journals; and review of reference lists. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) and observational studies (OSs) comparing albumin therapy in combination or alone with crystalloid therapy for the treatment of cerebral vasospasm in aSAH were included in the study. Risk-of-bias assessment was conducted using ROB2.0 and ROBINS-I tools for RCTs and Oss, respectively. Results: Out of a total of 1078 searches, one RCT (published in two articles) and one observational (retrospective) study were included for final analysis. In RCT, albumin was used for volume expansion therapy with a baseline crystalloid regime and comparison made between hypervolemic and normovolemic groups and it showed no beneficial effects on symptomatic vasospasm and clinical outcomes based on the Glasgow outcome scale. Furthermore, the use of albumin showed a tendency for sodium retention with lowering of glomerular filtration rate, limiting the amount of total fluid required for targeted central venous pressure values, and thereby avoiding fluid overload manifestations. The retrospective study results between albumin versus non-albumin groups (crystalloids only) supported improved outcomes in the former group with lower in-hospital mortality. Cardiorespiratory complications were equivocal in RCT and increased in non-albumin group in the retrospective study. Risk-of-bias assessment analyses revealed “some concerns” in RCT and “serious” limitation in OS due to its retrospective design. Conclusion: Albumin-induced volume expansion therapy for cerebral vasospasm does not have substantiative evidence to improve cerebral vasospasm and clinical outcomes in aSAH. Studies with well-designed RCTs are required to compare the use of albumin for volume expansion therapy versus standard fluid management using crystalloids to mitigate the scarcity of published data.
目的:本研究回顾了白蛋白诱导的容量扩张治疗对动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血(aSAH)症状性血管痉挛和临床结局的影响。材料和方法:计算机检索从Scopus, Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library和互联网文档中进行;手工检索医学期刊;查阅参考书目。随机对照试验(RCT)和观察性研究(OSs)比较白蛋白治疗联合或单独与晶体治疗治疗aSAH脑血管痉挛。对随机对照试验和操作系统分别使用ROB2.0和ROBINS-I工具进行风险偏倚评估。结果:在总共1078项检索中,一项RCT(发表在两篇文章中)和一项观察性(回顾性)研究被纳入最终分析。在随机对照试验中,白蛋白被用于容量扩张治疗和基线晶体方案,并在高容血和等容血组之间进行了比较,根据格拉斯哥结果量表,白蛋白对症状性血管痉挛和临床结果没有有益的影响。此外,白蛋白的使用显示出钠潴留的趋势,降低肾小球滤过率,限制了目标中心静脉压值所需的总液体量,从而避免了液体过载的表现。白蛋白组与非白蛋白组(仅晶体类)之间的回顾性研究结果支持前一组的预后改善,住院死亡率较低。在回顾性研究中,非白蛋白组的心肺并发症有所增加。偏倚风险评估分析显示RCT存在“一些问题”,而OS由于其回顾性设计而存在“严重”的局限性。结论:白蛋白诱导的容量扩张治疗脑血管痉挛并没有实质性的证据可以改善aSAH患者的脑血管痉挛和临床结果。需要设计良好的随机对照试验来比较白蛋白用于体积扩张治疗与使用晶体的标准液体管理,以减轻已发表数据的稀缺性。