Can emotional forgiveness promote a decision to forgive? Evidence from a six-wave random-intercept cross-lagged panel study of Pakistani Muslims during Ramadan

IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Zhuo Job Chen, Everett L. Worthington, Ziasma Khan, Guanglin Liu, Richard G. Cowden
{"title":"Can emotional forgiveness promote a decision to forgive? Evidence from a six-wave random-intercept cross-lagged panel study of Pakistani Muslims during Ramadan","authors":"Zhuo Job Chen, Everett L. Worthington, Ziasma Khan, Guanglin Liu, Richard G. Cowden","doi":"10.1080/17439760.2023.2257679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTWe examined the degree to which an extended religious experience during Ramadan might promote interpersonal forgiveness. With six waves of data from a sample of N = 215 Pakistani Muslim students, we used random-intercept cross-lagged panel modeling to examine the associations between decisional and emotional forgiveness from before to after Ramadan in 2020. We observed three key findings. First, we demonstrated the strong cross-time measurement invariance of both the Decision to Forgive and the Emotional Forgiveness scales. Second, both decisional and emotional forgiveness remained relatively stable during the holy month of Ramadan. Third, there was evidence supporting positive bidirectional temporal relations between decisional and emotional forgiveness, such that each construct demonstrated at least one positive lagged association with the other. We discuss some implications of the findings, including the potential for positive emotional changes to evoke positive changes in behavioral intentions towards transgressors.KEYWORDS: Longitudinalcross-lagged panel modelemotional forgivenessdecisional forgivenessRamadan Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).data availabilityThe data will be made available upon request by contacting the corresponding authorOpen scholarshipThis article has earned the Center for Open Science badge for Open Data. The data are openly accessible at osf.io/rc7z2/Supplementary materialSupplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2023.2257679","PeriodicalId":48231,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Positive Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Positive Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2023.2257679","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTWe examined the degree to which an extended religious experience during Ramadan might promote interpersonal forgiveness. With six waves of data from a sample of N = 215 Pakistani Muslim students, we used random-intercept cross-lagged panel modeling to examine the associations between decisional and emotional forgiveness from before to after Ramadan in 2020. We observed three key findings. First, we demonstrated the strong cross-time measurement invariance of both the Decision to Forgive and the Emotional Forgiveness scales. Second, both decisional and emotional forgiveness remained relatively stable during the holy month of Ramadan. Third, there was evidence supporting positive bidirectional temporal relations between decisional and emotional forgiveness, such that each construct demonstrated at least one positive lagged association with the other. We discuss some implications of the findings, including the potential for positive emotional changes to evoke positive changes in behavioral intentions towards transgressors.KEYWORDS: Longitudinalcross-lagged panel modelemotional forgivenessdecisional forgivenessRamadan Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).data availabilityThe data will be made available upon request by contacting the corresponding authorOpen scholarshipThis article has earned the Center for Open Science badge for Open Data. The data are openly accessible at osf.io/rc7z2/Supplementary materialSupplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2023.2257679
情感上的宽恕能促进原谅的决定吗?来自斋月期间巴基斯坦穆斯林六波随机截距交叉滞后小组研究的证据
摘要:我们研究了斋月期间延长的宗教体验可能促进人际宽恕的程度。利用来自N = 215名巴基斯坦穆斯林学生样本的六波数据,我们使用随机截取交叉滞后面板模型来检验2020年斋月前后决策宽恕和情感宽恕之间的关系。我们观察到三个关键发现。首先,我们证明了宽恕决策量表和情感宽恕量表具有很强的跨时间测量不变性。第二,在斋月期间,决策宽恕和情感宽恕都保持相对稳定。第三,有证据支持决策宽恕和情感宽恕之间的正向双向时间关系,这样每个构念至少表现出一个正向滞后关联。我们讨论了这些发现的一些含义,包括积极的情绪变化可能引起对违法者行为意图的积极变化。关键词:纵向交叉滞后面板模型情感宽恕决策宽恕斋月披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。数据的可用性数据将通过联系相应作者提供。Open scholarship这篇文章已经获得了Open Science Center for Open data徽章。这些数据可以在osf上公开访问。io/rc7z2/补充材料本文的补充数据可在https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2023.2257679上在线获取
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Positive Psychology
Journal of Positive Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
7.00%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: Positive psychology is about scientifically informed perspectives on what makes life worth living. It focuses on aspects of the human condition that lead to happiness, fulfillment, and flourishing. The Journal of Positive Psychology provides an interdisciplinary and international forum for the science and application of positive psychology. The Journal is devoted to basic research and professional application on states of optimal human functioning and fulfillment, and the facilitation and promotion of well-being. The Journal brings together leading work in positive psychology undertaken by researchers across different subdisciplines within psychology (e.g., social, personality, clinical, developmental, health, organizational), as well as across other social and behavioral disciplines.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信