Clinical study of analgesia in brachytherapy for cervical cancer

Q4 Medicine
Liu Mei, Wu Hai‐Yan, Li Jian, Ou Meng‐Yu, Sun Shu‐Fang, Tang Ying, Zhao Xiu‐Juan
{"title":"Clinical study of analgesia in brachytherapy for cervical cancer","authors":"Liu Mei, Wu Hai‐Yan, Li Jian, Ou Meng‐Yu, Sun Shu‐Fang, Tang Ying, Zhao Xiu‐Juan","doi":"10.1002/pro6.1194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective This study investigated the analgesic effects in patients with cervical cancer during brachytherapy. Methods In this prospective study, 100 patients with cervical cancer who were admitted to Chongqing University Cancer Hospital between July 2021 and April 2022 were randomly divided into an analgesia group (n = 50) and a control group (n = 50). The visual analog scale (VAS) scores at applicator placement‐T1, CT‐scan‐T2, and removal ‐T3, self‐rating anxiety scale (SAS) and self‐rating depression scale (SDS) scores before brachytherapy, short‐term clinical efficacy, and patient satisfaction were compared between the two groups. Results The VAS score of the analgesia group was significantly different at T1 (0 vs. 4.34±1.02, t = 67.40, p < 0.001), but not in the control group; however, there was no significant difference between the two groups at T2 ( t = ‐0.49, p = 0.623) and T3 ( t = ‐0.12, p = 0.912). The SAS and SDS scores first decreased and then increased in the analgesic group and increased in the control group with increasing brachytherapy time. Except for the first measurement, the differences between the two groups were statistically significant (all p < 0.001). The application of interstitial implantation ( p = 0.027), local efficacy ( p = 0.047), and patient satisfaction rates ( p = 0.025) were higher in the analgesic group than in the control group. Conclusion Analgesia can relieve pain, maintain physical and mental health, and improve outcomes and patient satisfaction rates for cervical cancer.","PeriodicalId":32406,"journal":{"name":"Precision Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Precision Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pro6.1194","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Objective This study investigated the analgesic effects in patients with cervical cancer during brachytherapy. Methods In this prospective study, 100 patients with cervical cancer who were admitted to Chongqing University Cancer Hospital between July 2021 and April 2022 were randomly divided into an analgesia group (n = 50) and a control group (n = 50). The visual analog scale (VAS) scores at applicator placement‐T1, CT‐scan‐T2, and removal ‐T3, self‐rating anxiety scale (SAS) and self‐rating depression scale (SDS) scores before brachytherapy, short‐term clinical efficacy, and patient satisfaction were compared between the two groups. Results The VAS score of the analgesia group was significantly different at T1 (0 vs. 4.34±1.02, t = 67.40, p < 0.001), but not in the control group; however, there was no significant difference between the two groups at T2 ( t = ‐0.49, p = 0.623) and T3 ( t = ‐0.12, p = 0.912). The SAS and SDS scores first decreased and then increased in the analgesic group and increased in the control group with increasing brachytherapy time. Except for the first measurement, the differences between the two groups were statistically significant (all p < 0.001). The application of interstitial implantation ( p = 0.027), local efficacy ( p = 0.047), and patient satisfaction rates ( p = 0.025) were higher in the analgesic group than in the control group. Conclusion Analgesia can relieve pain, maintain physical and mental health, and improve outcomes and patient satisfaction rates for cervical cancer.
宫颈癌近距离放疗镇痛的临床研究
摘要目的探讨宫颈癌患者近距离放疗的镇痛效果。方法本前瞻性研究选择2021年7月至2022年4月重庆大学肿瘤医院收治的100例宫颈癌患者,随机分为镇痛组(n = 50)和对照组(n = 50)。比较两组患者近距离放疗前的视觉模拟量表(VAS)、CT扫描- T2和移除- T3时的评分、焦虑自评量表(SAS)和抑郁自评量表(SDS)评分、短期临床疗效和患者满意度。结果在T1时镇痛组VAS评分差异有统计学意义(0比4.34±1.02,t = 67.40, p <0.001),但对照组没有;然而,两组在T2 (t =‐0.49,p = 0.623)和T3 (t =‐0.12,p = 0.912)时无显著差异。随着近距离治疗时间的延长,镇痛组SAS、SDS评分先降低后升高,对照组SAS、SDS评分先升高。除第一次测量外,两组间差异均有统计学意义(p <0.001)。镇痛组间质植入的应用(p = 0.027)、局部疗效(p = 0.047)、患者满意率(p = 0.025)均高于对照组。结论镇痛能减轻宫颈癌患者的疼痛,保持身心健康,提高预后和患者满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Precision Radiation Oncology
Precision Radiation Oncology Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信