Novel genomic offset metrics integrate local adaptation into habitat suitability forecasts and inform assisted migration

IF 7.1 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Susanne Lachmuth, Thibaut Capblancq, Anoob Prakash, Stephen R. Keller, Matthew C. Fitzpatrick
{"title":"Novel genomic offset metrics integrate local adaptation into habitat suitability forecasts and inform assisted migration","authors":"Susanne Lachmuth,&nbsp;Thibaut Capblancq,&nbsp;Anoob Prakash,&nbsp;Stephen R. Keller,&nbsp;Matthew C. Fitzpatrick","doi":"10.1002/ecm.1593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Genomic data are increasingly being integrated into macroecological forecasting, offering an evolutionary perspective that has been largely missing from global change biogeography. Genomic offset, which quantifies the disruption of genotype–environment associations under environmental change, allows for the incorporation of intraspecific climate-associated genomic differentiation into forecasts of habitat suitability. Gradient Forest (GF) is a commonly used approach to estimate genomic offset; however, major hurdles in the application of GF-derived genomic offsets are (1) an inability to interpret their absolute magnitude in an ecologically meaningful way and (2) uncertainty in how their implications compare with those of species-level approaches like Ecological Niche Models (ENMs). Here, we assess the climate change vulnerability of red spruce (<i>Picea rubens</i>), a cool-temperate tree species endemic to eastern North America, using both ENMs and GF modeling of genomic variation along climatic gradients. To gain better insights into climate change risks, we derive and apply two new threshold-based genomic offset metrics—Donor and Recipient Importance—that quantify the transferability of propagules between donor populations and recipient localities while minimizing disruption of genotype–environment associations. We also propose and test a method for scaling genomic offsets relative to contemporary genomic variation across the landscape. In three common gardens, we found a significant negative relationship between (scaled) genomic offsets and red spruce growth and higher explanatory power for scaled offsets than climate transfer distances. However, the garden results also revealed the potential effects of spatial extrapolation and neutral genomic differentiation that can compromise the degree to which genomic offsets represent maladaptation and highlight the necessity of using common garden data to evaluate offset-based predictions. ENMs and our novel genomic offset metrics forecasted drastic northward range shifts in suitable habitats. Combining inferences from our offset-based metrics, we show that a northward shift mainly will be required for populations in the central and northern parts of red spruce's current range, whereas southern populations might persist in situ due to climate-associated variation with less offset under future climate. These new genomic offset metrics thus yield refined, region-specific prognoses for local persistence and show how management could be improved by considering assisted migration.</p>","PeriodicalId":11505,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Monographs","volume":"94 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Monographs","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecm.1593","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Genomic data are increasingly being integrated into macroecological forecasting, offering an evolutionary perspective that has been largely missing from global change biogeography. Genomic offset, which quantifies the disruption of genotype–environment associations under environmental change, allows for the incorporation of intraspecific climate-associated genomic differentiation into forecasts of habitat suitability. Gradient Forest (GF) is a commonly used approach to estimate genomic offset; however, major hurdles in the application of GF-derived genomic offsets are (1) an inability to interpret their absolute magnitude in an ecologically meaningful way and (2) uncertainty in how their implications compare with those of species-level approaches like Ecological Niche Models (ENMs). Here, we assess the climate change vulnerability of red spruce (Picea rubens), a cool-temperate tree species endemic to eastern North America, using both ENMs and GF modeling of genomic variation along climatic gradients. To gain better insights into climate change risks, we derive and apply two new threshold-based genomic offset metrics—Donor and Recipient Importance—that quantify the transferability of propagules between donor populations and recipient localities while minimizing disruption of genotype–environment associations. We also propose and test a method for scaling genomic offsets relative to contemporary genomic variation across the landscape. In three common gardens, we found a significant negative relationship between (scaled) genomic offsets and red spruce growth and higher explanatory power for scaled offsets than climate transfer distances. However, the garden results also revealed the potential effects of spatial extrapolation and neutral genomic differentiation that can compromise the degree to which genomic offsets represent maladaptation and highlight the necessity of using common garden data to evaluate offset-based predictions. ENMs and our novel genomic offset metrics forecasted drastic northward range shifts in suitable habitats. Combining inferences from our offset-based metrics, we show that a northward shift mainly will be required for populations in the central and northern parts of red spruce's current range, whereas southern populations might persist in situ due to climate-associated variation with less offset under future climate. These new genomic offset metrics thus yield refined, region-specific prognoses for local persistence and show how management could be improved by considering assisted migration.

新的基因组补偿指标将当地适应性纳入栖息地适宜性预测,并为辅助迁移提供信息
基因组数据正越来越多地被纳入宏观生态预测,提供了全球变化生物地理学中基本缺失的进化视角。基因组偏移可以量化环境变化对基因型-环境关联的破坏,从而将与气候相关的种内基因组分化纳入栖息地适宜性预测。梯度森林(GF)是估算基因组抵消的常用方法;然而,GF 衍生的基因组抵消在应用中遇到的主要障碍是:(1)无法以生态学意义上的方式解释其绝对值;(2)其影响与生态位模型(ENM)等物种水平方法的影响相比存在不确定性。在这里,我们利用生态位模型和沿气候梯度的基因组变异全球因子模型,评估了红云杉(Picea rubens)的气候变化脆弱性,红云杉是北美东部特有的一种寒温带树种。为了更好地了解气候变化风险,我们推导并应用了两个新的基于阈值的基因组抵消指标--供体重要性和受体重要性--这两个指标量化了供体种群和受体地区之间的传播性,同时最大限度地减少了对基因型-环境关联的破坏。我们还提出并测试了一种方法,可根据整个景观中的当代基因组变异来调整基因组偏移量。在三个常见的花园中,我们发现(按比例)基因组偏移与红云杉的生长之间存在显著的负相关,并且按比例偏移的解释力高于气候转移距离。不过,花园的结果也揭示了空间外推法和中性基因组分化的潜在影响,这可能会影响基因组偏移代表适应不良的程度,并突出了使用普通花园数据来评估基于偏移的预测的必要性。ENMs和我们的新型基因组偏移指标预测了适宜栖息地范围的急剧北移。结合我们基于偏移指标的推论,我们表明红云杉目前分布区中部和北部的种群主要需要向北迁移,而南部种群可能会由于气候相关变异而在原地持续存在,在未来气候条件下偏移较少。因此,这些新的基因组偏移指标为当地的持续存在提供了精细的、针对特定地区的预测,并说明了如何通过考虑辅助迁移来改善管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Monographs
Ecological Monographs 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
61
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The vision for Ecological Monographs is that it should be the place for publishing integrative, synthetic papers that elaborate new directions for the field of ecology. Original Research Papers published in Ecological Monographs will continue to document complex observational, experimental, or theoretical studies that by their very integrated nature defy dissolution into shorter publications focused on a single topic or message. Reviews will be comprehensive and synthetic papers that establish new benchmarks in the field, define directions for future research, contribute to fundamental understanding of ecological principles, and derive principles for ecological management in its broadest sense (including, but not limited to: conservation, mitigation, restoration, and pro-active protection of the environment). Reviews should reflect the full development of a topic and encompass relevant natural history, observational and experimental data, analyses, models, and theory. Reviews published in Ecological Monographs should further blur the boundaries between “basic” and “applied” ecology. Concepts and Synthesis papers will conceptually advance the field of ecology. These papers are expected to go well beyond works being reviewed and include discussion of new directions, new syntheses, and resolutions of old questions. In this world of rapid scientific advancement and never-ending environmental change, there needs to be room for the thoughtful integration of scientific ideas, data, and concepts that feeds the mind and guides the development of the maturing science of ecology. Ecological Monographs provides that room, with an expansive view to a sustainable future.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信