Behaviour change interventions for physical activity in adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Ciara Hanrahan , Julie Broderick , Terence M. O'Connor , Joseph G. McVeigh
{"title":"Behaviour change interventions for physical activity in adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Ciara Hanrahan ,&nbsp;Julie Broderick ,&nbsp;Terence M. O'Connor ,&nbsp;Joseph G. McVeigh","doi":"10.1016/j.resmer.2023.101068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span>Physical activity in adults with COPD is poor, but behaviour change interventions could help improve activity. This </span>systematic review aims to examine behaviour change interventions to promote physical activity and health outcomes for adults with COPD.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Eight databases were searched from inception until April 2023: Web of Science, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, APA PsychINFO, CINAHL, PROSPERO, Cochrane Airways Trials Register. Relevant studies were appraised to determine the impact of behaviour change interventions on physical activity outcomes. Interventions were mapped to Michie's Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and a meta-analysis and narrative synthesis conducted. The Cochrane risk of bias tool 2 and the GRADE criteria evaluated bias and the quality and certainty of the evidence.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>Twelve randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in the review (</span><em>n</em><span><span> = 1211). The most frequently utilized behaviour change interventions included counselling, stepcount monitoring, social support and goal setting. The most commonly measured outcomes across studies were steps-per-day, physical activity levels, exercise capacity and </span>quality of life. A meta-analysis of comparable studies demonstrated there was no difference in stepcount in favour of behaviour change interventions with respect to steps-per-day (SMD 0.16, 95 % CI -0.03, 0.36; </span><em>p</em> = 0.10). There was some evidence of short-term improvement in physical activity and quality of life, with behaviour change interventions related to goals, behaviour regulation and social influences.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>People with COPD may benefit from behaviour change interventions to increase physical activity and quality of life in the short-term. The overall certainty and quality of the evidence is low.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48479,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory Medicine and Research","volume":"85 ","pages":"Article 101068"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory Medicine and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590041223000806","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Physical activity in adults with COPD is poor, but behaviour change interventions could help improve activity. This systematic review aims to examine behaviour change interventions to promote physical activity and health outcomes for adults with COPD.

Methods

Eight databases were searched from inception until April 2023: Web of Science, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, APA PsychINFO, CINAHL, PROSPERO, Cochrane Airways Trials Register. Relevant studies were appraised to determine the impact of behaviour change interventions on physical activity outcomes. Interventions were mapped to Michie's Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and a meta-analysis and narrative synthesis conducted. The Cochrane risk of bias tool 2 and the GRADE criteria evaluated bias and the quality and certainty of the evidence.

Results

Twelve randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in the review (n = 1211). The most frequently utilized behaviour change interventions included counselling, stepcount monitoring, social support and goal setting. The most commonly measured outcomes across studies were steps-per-day, physical activity levels, exercise capacity and quality of life. A meta-analysis of comparable studies demonstrated there was no difference in stepcount in favour of behaviour change interventions with respect to steps-per-day (SMD 0.16, 95 % CI -0.03, 0.36; p = 0.10). There was some evidence of short-term improvement in physical activity and quality of life, with behaviour change interventions related to goals, behaviour regulation and social influences.

Conclusions

People with COPD may benefit from behaviour change interventions to increase physical activity and quality of life in the short-term. The overall certainty and quality of the evidence is low.

针对慢性阻塞性肺病成人体育锻炼的行为改变干预;系统回顾和荟萃分析
背景慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)成人患者的体力活动较少,但改变行为的干预措施有助于提高患者的体力活动。本系统综述旨在研究行为改变干预措施,以促进慢性阻塞性肺病成人患者的体育锻炼并改善其健康状况:方法检索了从开始到 2023 年 4 月的八个数据库:Web of Science、CENTRAL、MEDLINE、EMBASE、APA PsychINFO、CINAHL、PROSPERO、Cochrane Airways Trials Register。对相关研究进行评估,以确定行为改变干预对体育锻炼结果的影响。根据 Michie 的理论领域框架 (TDF) 对干预措施进行了映射,并进行了荟萃分析和叙述性综合。科克伦偏倚风险工具 2 和 GRADE 标准对偏倚以及证据的质量和确定性进行了评估。结果12 项随机对照试验(RCT)被纳入综述(n = 1211)。最常用的行为改变干预措施包括咨询、步数监测、社会支持和目标设定。各项研究中最常测量的结果是每日步数、体力活动水平、运动能力和生活质量。对可比研究进行的荟萃分析表明,在每天步数方面,行为改变干预对步数没有影响(SMD 0.16,95 % CI -0.03,0.36;P = 0.10)。有证据表明,通过与目标、行为调节和社会影响相关的行为改变干预,短期内可改善体力活动和生活质量。结论慢性阻塞性肺病患者可从行为改变干预中获益,短期内可增加体力活动和提高生活质量。证据的总体确定性和质量较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Respiratory Medicine and Research
Respiratory Medicine and Research RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
审稿时长
50 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信