Validación del cuestionario de anosognosia en demencia en personas con trastorno neurocognitivo mayor de Colombia

Q3 Medicine
Claudia Ramos , Juliana Pulido , Jesús David Bedoya , Claudia Madrigal , Margarita Giraldo , Diana Alzate , Daniel Camilo Aguirre-Acevedo , Francisco Lopera , Jenny García
{"title":"Validación del cuestionario de anosognosia en demencia en personas con trastorno neurocognitivo mayor de Colombia","authors":"Claudia Ramos ,&nbsp;Juliana Pulido ,&nbsp;Jesús David Bedoya ,&nbsp;Claudia Madrigal ,&nbsp;Margarita Giraldo ,&nbsp;Diana Alzate ,&nbsp;Daniel Camilo Aguirre-Acevedo ,&nbsp;Francisco Lopera ,&nbsp;Jenny García","doi":"10.1016/j.rcp.2023.09.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To establish the validity and reliability of the Anosognosia Questionnaire in Dementia (AQ-D) in individuals diagnosed with major neurocognitive disorder (MND) in the Colombian population.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The AQ-D scale was adapted and validated for MND patients in Colombia through cognitive interviews and expert review. A total of 189 pairs of participants, consisting of caregivers and patients, were included in the study and administered the AQ-D questionnaire. Structural validity, internal consistency, discriminative and concurrent criterion validity, convergent validity, and test–retest feasibility were assessed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>After exploring three models in confirmatory factorial analysis, a four-dimension model was adopted to evaluate the validity of the AQ-D scale. The scale demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega above 0.7 for each dimension and the total scale), and acceptable test-retest reliability (ICC 0.73; 95% CI: 0.55-0.84). A sensibility was 80.0% and specificity 57.6% were found using a cutoff point of 10, indicating good discriminative validity (<em>P</em>&lt;.05 for all cases). Additionally, positive correlations were found between the AQ-D and the Zarit and NPI scales, while negative correlations were observed with the Mini-mental and Yesavage scales.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The AQ-D is valid and reliable for screening anosognosia in Colombian patients with MND.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":52477,"journal":{"name":"Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatria","volume":"54 ","pages":"Pages 98-109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034745023000926","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To establish the validity and reliability of the Anosognosia Questionnaire in Dementia (AQ-D) in individuals diagnosed with major neurocognitive disorder (MND) in the Colombian population.

Methods

The AQ-D scale was adapted and validated for MND patients in Colombia through cognitive interviews and expert review. A total of 189 pairs of participants, consisting of caregivers and patients, were included in the study and administered the AQ-D questionnaire. Structural validity, internal consistency, discriminative and concurrent criterion validity, convergent validity, and test–retest feasibility were assessed.

Results

After exploring three models in confirmatory factorial analysis, a four-dimension model was adopted to evaluate the validity of the AQ-D scale. The scale demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega above 0.7 for each dimension and the total scale), and acceptable test-retest reliability (ICC 0.73; 95% CI: 0.55-0.84). A sensibility was 80.0% and specificity 57.6% were found using a cutoff point of 10, indicating good discriminative validity (P<.05 for all cases). Additionally, positive correlations were found between the AQ-D and the Zarit and NPI scales, while negative correlations were observed with the Mini-mental and Yesavage scales.

Conclusion

The AQ-D is valid and reliable for screening anosognosia in Colombian patients with MND.
哥伦比亚严重神经认知障碍患者痴呆厌食症问卷的验证
目的探讨哥伦比亚重度神经认知障碍(MND)患者痴呆病感失认问卷(Anosognosia Questionnaire in Dementia, AQ-D)的效度和信度。方法采用认知访谈法和专家评比法对哥伦比亚MND患者的AQ-D量表进行调整和验证。共有189对参与者,包括护理人员和患者,被纳入研究并进行了AQ-D问卷调查。评估了结构效度、内部一致性、判别效度和并发效度、收敛效度和重测可行性。结果在验证性析因分析中探索了三个模型后,采用一个四维模型来评价AQ-D量表的效度。量表具有良好的内部一致性(Cronbach's alpha和McDonald's omega各维度及总量表均在0.7以上),重测信度可接受(ICC 0.73;95% ci: 0.55-0.84)。灵敏度为80.0%,特异性为57.6%,使用10的截断点,表明具有良好的判别效度(P<;所有情况都是05)。此外,iq - d与Zarit和NPI量表呈显著正相关,与Mini-mental和Yesavage量表呈显著负相关。结论AQ-D筛查哥伦比亚MND患者病感缺失是有效可靠的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatria
Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatria Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatría (RCP) is a quarterly official publication of Colombian Psychiatry Association (March, June, September and December) and its purpose is to spread different the knowledge models that currently constitute the theoretical and practical body of our specialty. Psychiatrists, psychiatric residents, non psychiatric physicians, psychologists, philosophers or other health professionals or persons interested in this area can take part in the magazine. This journal publishes original works, revision or updating articles, case reports of all psychiatry and mental health areas, epistemology, mind philosophy, bioethics and also articles about methodology of investigation and critical reading.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信