Antibiotic resistance and susceptibility pattern of different microorganisms against nadifloxacin

Monil Yogesh Neena Gala, Snehal Muchhala, Seema Bhagat, Arti Sanghavi, Rahul Rathod, Bhavesh Kotak, Rashmi Khadapkar
{"title":"Antibiotic resistance and susceptibility pattern of different microorganisms against nadifloxacin","authors":"Monil Yogesh Neena Gala, Snehal Muchhala, Seema Bhagat, Arti Sanghavi, Rahul Rathod, Bhavesh Kotak, Rashmi Khadapkar","doi":"10.18231/j.ijpp.2023.039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) are common and can have serious implications.Nadifloxacin’s broad-spectrum antibiotic activity may potentially provide therapeutic benefits for skininfections. Also, it offers a viable alternative therapy for topical agent resistance. This study investigates the antimicrobial susceptibility of eight micro-organisms to four important topical antibiotics: Mupirocin, Clindamycin, Fusidic acid, and Nadifloxacin. Antibiotic susceptibility and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) were determined using Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion, Epsilometer test (E-Test), and Micro-broth dilution methods. Mueller Hinton and Brucella blood agar served as growth media. HiComb strips from HiMedia were used, and QC strains were tested. Kirby-Bauer assessed Zone of Inhibition; HiComb determined MIC via gradient; Micro-broth dilution gauged growth in antibiotic-diluted broth. The disk diffusion method revealed varying resistance percentages for antibiotics. Clindamycin had the highest resistance (62%) followed by fusidic acid (47%), Nadifloxacin (15%), and mupirocin (5%). Among gram-positive isolates, Nadifloxacin and mupirocin had 100% sensitivity, while Fusidic acid showed moderate resistance (19%) and clindamycin highest resistance (42%). Among gram-negative isolates, clindamycin and fusidic acid had 100% resistance, while Nadifloxacin (42%) and mupirocin (15%) showed comparatively low resistance. Among the 57 species isolates, including 49 isolates of and 8 isolates of the antibiotic susceptibility testing revealed a MIC value <4 μg/ml of Nadifloxacin, with a high level of sensitivity across all isolates. Nadifloxacin’s superior efficacy in the study can be attributed to its mechanism of action, targeting bacterial DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV, making it suitable for bacterial infections, particularly those involving the skin and soft tissuesOut of four antibiotics tested, Nadifloxacin was found to be effective against both gram-positive and gram-negative strains of bacteria.","PeriodicalId":13313,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology","volume":"107 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijpp.2023.039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) are common and can have serious implications.Nadifloxacin’s broad-spectrum antibiotic activity may potentially provide therapeutic benefits for skininfections. Also, it offers a viable alternative therapy for topical agent resistance. This study investigates the antimicrobial susceptibility of eight micro-organisms to four important topical antibiotics: Mupirocin, Clindamycin, Fusidic acid, and Nadifloxacin. Antibiotic susceptibility and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) were determined using Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion, Epsilometer test (E-Test), and Micro-broth dilution methods. Mueller Hinton and Brucella blood agar served as growth media. HiComb strips from HiMedia were used, and QC strains were tested. Kirby-Bauer assessed Zone of Inhibition; HiComb determined MIC via gradient; Micro-broth dilution gauged growth in antibiotic-diluted broth. The disk diffusion method revealed varying resistance percentages for antibiotics. Clindamycin had the highest resistance (62%) followed by fusidic acid (47%), Nadifloxacin (15%), and mupirocin (5%). Among gram-positive isolates, Nadifloxacin and mupirocin had 100% sensitivity, while Fusidic acid showed moderate resistance (19%) and clindamycin highest resistance (42%). Among gram-negative isolates, clindamycin and fusidic acid had 100% resistance, while Nadifloxacin (42%) and mupirocin (15%) showed comparatively low resistance. Among the 57 species isolates, including 49 isolates of and 8 isolates of the antibiotic susceptibility testing revealed a MIC value <4 μg/ml of Nadifloxacin, with a high level of sensitivity across all isolates. Nadifloxacin’s superior efficacy in the study can be attributed to its mechanism of action, targeting bacterial DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV, making it suitable for bacterial infections, particularly those involving the skin and soft tissuesOut of four antibiotics tested, Nadifloxacin was found to be effective against both gram-positive and gram-negative strains of bacteria.
不同微生物对纳地沙星的耐药性及药敏模式
皮肤和软组织感染(SSTIs)是常见的,可以有严重的影响。纳地沙星的广谱抗生素活性可能对皮肤感染有潜在的治疗作用。此外,它提供了一个可行的替代治疗局部药物耐药性。本研究调查了八种微生物对四种重要外用抗生素的敏感性:莫匹罗星、克林霉素、福西地酸和纳地沙星。采用Kirby-Bauer纸片扩散法、Epsilometer试验(E-Test)和微肉汤稀释法测定抗生素敏感性和最低抑菌浓度(MIC)。Mueller Hinton和布鲁氏菌血琼脂作为生长培养基。采用HiMedia公司的HiComb试纸,对QC菌株进行检测。Kirby-Bauer抑制区评估;HiComb通过梯度测定MIC;微肉汤稀释测量抗生素稀释肉汤中的生长。纸片扩散法对抗生素的耐药百分比不同。耐药率最高的是克林霉素(62%),其次是福西地酸(47%)、纳地沙星(15%)和莫匹罗星(5%)。革兰氏阳性分离株对纳地沙星和莫匹罗星的敏感性为100%,对夫西地酸的敏感性为中等(19%),对克林霉素的敏感性最高(42%)。革兰氏阴性菌株中,克林霉素和夫西地酸的耐药率为100%,纳地沙星(42%)和莫匹罗星(15%)的耐药率较低。57株分离株中,49株和8株药敏试验显示纳地沙星的MIC值为<4 μg/ml,所有分离株均具有较高的敏感性。纳地沙星在本研究中的优越疗效可归因于其作用机制,其靶向细菌DNA回转酶和拓扑异构酶IV,使其适用于细菌感染,特别是涉及皮肤和软组织的细菌感染。在四种抗生素测试中,纳地沙星被发现对革兰氏阳性和革兰氏阴性菌株都有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信