Cooking with Modern Energy in Rural Households of India

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Krittika Roy
{"title":"Cooking with Modern Energy in Rural Households of India","authors":"Krittika Roy","doi":"10.37773/ees.v7i1.998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Between 2016 and 2019, there has been an improvement in the percentage of rural households using clean cooking energy, partly owing to government interventions. However, unclean solid fuels are still the primary source of energy for cooking purposes for about 60% of rural households. One of the foremost reasons for this is the cost of acquiring and using clean energy sources. This paper estimates the cost incurred by a household when switching from solid fuels to liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) or electricity for cooking, followed by a social cost–benefit analysis of two interventions: universal provision of LPG to all rural households and universal provision of electricity to all rural households. The findings suggest that electricity is a cheaper alternative to LPG at the household level; however, investing in the universal provision of LPG is socially beneficial for the government. Universal provision of electricity for cooking can only become socially beneficial if the proportion of renewable electricity increases, reducing the environmental costs of carbon emissions from coal-based power plants. Keywords: LPG, electricity, cost, benefit, social, energy","PeriodicalId":34130,"journal":{"name":"Ecology Economy and Society - The INSEE Journal","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology Economy and Society - The INSEE Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37773/ees.v7i1.998","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Between 2016 and 2019, there has been an improvement in the percentage of rural households using clean cooking energy, partly owing to government interventions. However, unclean solid fuels are still the primary source of energy for cooking purposes for about 60% of rural households. One of the foremost reasons for this is the cost of acquiring and using clean energy sources. This paper estimates the cost incurred by a household when switching from solid fuels to liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) or electricity for cooking, followed by a social cost–benefit analysis of two interventions: universal provision of LPG to all rural households and universal provision of electricity to all rural households. The findings suggest that electricity is a cheaper alternative to LPG at the household level; however, investing in the universal provision of LPG is socially beneficial for the government. Universal provision of electricity for cooking can only become socially beneficial if the proportion of renewable electricity increases, reducing the environmental costs of carbon emissions from coal-based power plants. Keywords: LPG, electricity, cost, benefit, social, energy
印度农村家庭用现代能源烹饪
2016年至2019年期间,使用清洁烹饪能源的农村家庭比例有所提高,部分原因是政府干预。然而,不清洁的固体燃料仍然是约60%农村家庭烹饪的主要能源来源。其中一个最重要的原因是获取和使用清洁能源的成本。本文估计了一个家庭从固体燃料转向液化石油气(LPG)或用电做饭所产生的成本,然后对两种干预措施进行了社会成本效益分析:向所有农村家庭普遍提供液化石油气和向所有农村家庭普遍提供电力。研究结果表明,在家庭层面上,电力是一种比液化石油气更便宜的替代品;然而,投资于液化石油气的普遍供应对政府来说是有益的。只有增加可再生电力的比例,减少燃煤电厂碳排放的环境成本,普遍提供烹饪用电才会对社会有益。关键词:LPG,电力,成本,效益,社会,能源
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecology Economy and Society - The INSEE Journal
Ecology Economy and Society - The INSEE Journal Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Forestry
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信