The convergence and divergence of the United States and the European Union have influenced the state-building process in Afghanistan over the past two decades.

Alireza Kargar
{"title":"The convergence and divergence of the United States and the European Union have influenced the state-building process in Afghanistan over the past two decades.","authors":"Alireza Kargar","doi":"10.61438/jsrqj.v8i3.30","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The history of Afghanistan can be seen as lacking fundamental and structural governments, although rulers under the title of the state governed the country in the recent century. However, the absence of accountable governments led the country to remain in perpetual conflict and chronic violence. After 2001, when a new chapter in Afghanistan's political history began, the United States and the European Union had direct and indirect involvement in all Afghan affairs. Misunderstanding the necessity and importance of Afghanistan's cultural, historical structures, and underdevelopment in governance contributed significantly to the challenge of state-building. The main question is: how has the convergence and divergence between the United States and the European Union influenced the state-building process in Afghanistan over the past two decades?
 Apparently, the European Union and the United States did not fundamentally differ in their definition of governance issues. However, they had differences in their approaches and methods to achieve their goals, which had a negative impact on the state-building process in Afghanistan. This study utilized analytical-descriptive methods and collected information from library resources, articles, and journals. The findings indicate that over the past two decades, the European Union and the United States did not differ in supporting a strong government in Afghanistan. However, they had differences in their approaches and methods to achieve their goals, leading to the failure of state-building efforts.","PeriodicalId":479332,"journal":{"name":"Jami Scientific Research Quarterly Journal","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jami Scientific Research Quarterly Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61438/jsrqj.v8i3.30","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The history of Afghanistan can be seen as lacking fundamental and structural governments, although rulers under the title of the state governed the country in the recent century. However, the absence of accountable governments led the country to remain in perpetual conflict and chronic violence. After 2001, when a new chapter in Afghanistan's political history began, the United States and the European Union had direct and indirect involvement in all Afghan affairs. Misunderstanding the necessity and importance of Afghanistan's cultural, historical structures, and underdevelopment in governance contributed significantly to the challenge of state-building. The main question is: how has the convergence and divergence between the United States and the European Union influenced the state-building process in Afghanistan over the past two decades? Apparently, the European Union and the United States did not fundamentally differ in their definition of governance issues. However, they had differences in their approaches and methods to achieve their goals, which had a negative impact on the state-building process in Afghanistan. This study utilized analytical-descriptive methods and collected information from library resources, articles, and journals. The findings indicate that over the past two decades, the European Union and the United States did not differ in supporting a strong government in Afghanistan. However, they had differences in their approaches and methods to achieve their goals, leading to the failure of state-building efforts.
过去二十年来,美国和欧盟的趋同和分歧影响了阿富汗的国家建设进程。
阿富汗的历史可以被看作是缺乏基本的和结构性的政府,尽管在最近一个世纪里,统治者以国家的名义统治着这个国家。然而,由于缺乏负责任的政府,该国仍处于长期冲突和长期暴力之中。2001年以后,阿富汗的政治历史掀开了新的篇章,美国和欧盟直接或间接地介入了阿富汗的所有事务。对阿富汗文化、历史结构的必要性和重要性的误解,以及治理方面的不发达,极大地加剧了国家建设的挑战。主要问题是:美国和欧盟之间的趋同和分歧如何影响了过去二十年来阿富汗的国家建设进程?显然,欧盟和美国对治理问题的定义并没有根本的不同。但是,他们在实现其目标的途径和方法上存在差异,这对阿富汗的国家建设进程产生了消极影响。本研究采用分析-描述的方法,从图书馆资源、文章和期刊中收集信息。调查结果表明,在过去的二十年里,欧盟和美国在支持阿富汗建立一个强大政府的问题上并没有什么不同。然而,他们在实现目标的途径和方法上存在差异,导致了国家建设的失败。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信