Rethinking Revelation

Q4 Social Sciences
Dialogue Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.5406/15549399.56.1.25
Joni Newman
{"title":"Rethinking Revelation","authors":"Joni Newman","doi":"10.5406/15549399.56.1.25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When I was about twelve, yet another retelling of the Cinderella story was released into theatres in a magic-free but nonetheless magical version called Ever After. One of my favorite scenes in this film involves the prince pacing along a riverbank, bemoaning the challenge of finding his true love to Leonardo da Vinci. He asks the great Renaissance man, How can you be certain to find [the right person]? And if you find them, are they really the one for you, or do you only think they are? What if the person you're meant to be with never appears? Or she does but you're too distracted to notice? You learn to pay attention. Then, let's say God puts two people on earth, and they are lucky enough to find one another. But one of them gets hit by lightning. Well, then, what? Is that it? Or perchance you meet someone new and marry again. Is that the lady you should be with, or was it the first? When the two of them are side by side, were they both the one for you and you just met the first one first? Or is the second one supposed to be first?1An understandably exasperated da Vinci tells the prince that he needs to learn to pay attention and not leave everything to fate. In other words, he needs to quit worrying about making the one right choice and just choose.Knowing how to make good decisions can be rather overwhelming and perhaps lead us to the petrified paranoia of indecision, too afraid of getting it wrong to move forward with faith. In seeking out answers on how to understand and recognize the voice of God, the scriptures and the prophets have offered plenty of advice. For instance, many prophets have suggested the pattern of searching the scriptures, meditating upon the answer, and praying for clarification. Simple. But how do we know that we have received an answer? In section 8 of the Doctrine and Covenants, Joseph Smith reveals to Oliver Cowdery that he will be told “in [his] mind and in [his] heart” what to do (D&C 8:2, emphasis added). Another revelation refers to Oliver as being enlightened in his mind alone (D&C 6:15). To complicate matters, President Harold B. Lee once said, “When your heart begins to tell you things that your mind does not, then you are getting the Spirit of the Lord,” in direct contrast to additional counsel that Oliver was given.2 Should we wait to feel peace of mind? Of heart? Of both?Other scriptures speak of hearing an internal voice—sometimes a loud one, more often still or small—or of finding insight through the written word of God. We might listen to music, experience feelings of peace, or a more intense “burning of the bosom.” Answers may come through time alone or in the company of others. In other words: there are so many possible avenues through which we can receive divine counsel that we may find that, like Prince Henry in Ever After, we end up stuck pacing along a riverbank trying desperately to know whether or not we have received the answer we sought for, too anxious about making the wrong decision to act at all.We are not alone in feeling at times unsure about the promptings we receive. Consider the story of Nephi. Nephi, raised as a Jew in the same household as his father, the prophet Lehi, would have known that God had commanded his people not to kill. And yet he found himself at the feet of a drunken Laban being prompted to kill the man who stood between him and access to the records of his ancestry. Three times the Spirit “constrains” Nephi with the instruction to kill Laban, leaving Nephi literally shaking at the thought. The word “constrain” is not “still” or “small.” It suggests boldness and urgency. Its Latin root refers to being shackled. The later French definition defines “constraining” as exerting force, physical or moral, upon another being. This is no subtle voice of instruction but a powerful and immediate contradiction to what Nephi had previously understood as immutable truth. Nephi listens to this counsel and must reconcile two conflicting instructions. The first was the commandment not to kill. The second was the immediate instruction to retrieve the record in order to perpetuate the gospel among his descendants. He follows the counsel of the Spirit in that moment and slays Laban, thus preserving important information for his family.Another example comes from Mother Eve, also presented with conflicting instructions. She and Adam are told to multiply and replenish the earth, to take care of the garden, and to enjoy every benefit the garden had for them except for the fruit from the tree of knowledge of good and evil. Eve eventually recognizes that in order to fulfill God's plan, she and Adam need to leave their temporary paradise and sacrifice ignorance for knowledge and ease for labor. They cannot follow both instructions: she is able to study out these choices in her mind and make a decision, accepting the consequences of that choice, both good and bad.We can also look to the story of Abraham and the near sacrifice of his son, Isaac. Although often portrayed as a young boy in art, religious scholars suggest instead that Isaac was a grown man by this time and as much a participant as Abraham was in climbing Mount Moriah and onto the alter that his father had built. This instruction must have been not only confusing to Abraham and Isaac but utterly devastating to both Abraham and Sarah, after so many years of living without children. Yet even when inspired to do the unthinkable, Abraham and Isaac move forward with full intent to follow through on the instruction they receive. Abraham's knife is literally in the air above Isaac before the Spirit “called unto him out of heaven” (Genesis 22:11) to spare Isaac's life.From these stories and others, we learn that while a spirit of peace or joy or comfort may come from following the promptings of the Spirit, that does not necessarily mean that the action we feel inspired to take will always be inherently comfortable or uncomplicated. The instruction may not even make immediate sense or could seem contradictory to what we have previously felt to be true. To follow the Spirit, we may have to be as my landlord Brother Duffin said so eloquently to me this week, a bit “crazy, cuckoo bonkers.” We must do what is right and let the consequence follow, even if that consequence may be murky or unfathomable. We may not be called to mountain heights or stormy seas—but we might be. We must be prepared to travel waters and paths both familiar to us and unfamiliar to seemingly anyone.How do we know, then, that we act in good faith with the Spirit when we make decisions that may seem firmly in the land of the crazy, cuckoo, and bonkers? I believe that one of the most important first steps we can take is to free ourselves of the belief that we will ever make a decision in our lives that is free of consequences that are both good and bad. This is part of the fabric of the human experience. We will never make decisions that do not ripple outward into the universe positively and negatively. Part of both receiving and acting upon personal revelation requires us to abandon the notion that we are in control of either the answers we receive from the divine or the consequences of following those promptings.The great philosopher Aristotle once said that that which is created cannot be free. This means, as Fiona and Terryl Givens explain, “that agency could not exist, let alone flourish, if we were created beings. (The creator is responsible for the nature [and failures] of the created, whether cookies, a bridge, or a human soul.)” Because agency is so essential to every piece of God's plan, this suggests that we are not simply “willing subjects of the Father's plan but collaborators in its very inception.”3As collaborators in this plan, we can take comfort in expecting that God will continue to collaborate along with us as we stumble along with the tasks of continuing the restoration of the gospel and in gathering Zion. God's plan centers around us using our agency to be anxiously engaged in good causes and in doing many things of our own free will.4 Parley Pratt taught that our decisions and personal preferences “are the very mainsprings of life and happiness—they are the cement of all virtuous and heavenly society. . . . Aided and directed by the light of heaven . . . every affection, attribute, power and energy or your body and mind may be cultivated, increased, enlarged, perfected . . . for the glory and happiness of yourself and all of those whose good fortune it may be to be associated with you.”5 Our particular spheres of influence and interest will directly relate to the way in which we connect with heaven. This can lead to some beautiful and individualized ways in which we draw closer to our heavenly parents and the language through which they speak to us. For instance, I find that I am just as likely to find answers to my prayers through study of the scriptures as I am in an excellent book, in a theatre, or in a symphony.On the other hand, there are many ways in which instruction from God can become a bit lost in translation. We can overshoot the mark, misunderstand, or misapply instructions and become inadvertent pharisees, promoting what with think to be right but instead causing harm. I'm reminded of the lessons I heard when I was younger about girls who have had sex before marriage being like a chewed piece of gum no one wants, for instance, or the racist and false messages from years ago about Black members of the Church not receiving the priesthood because of the mark of Cain. In our desire to apply the gospel, we may make small or much more serious errors.We can take comfort in knowing that God has prepared to assist us in making corrections. In fact, the role of our heavenly parents is, in part, to make order from our mess. Fiona and Terryl Givens also suggest that “[God's] divine energies are spent not in precluding chaos but in reordering it, not in preventing suffering, but in alchemizing it, not in disallowing error but in transmuting it into goodness. Satan's unhindered efforts in the garden were simply assimilated into God's greater purpose. The malice of the biblical Joseph's brothers became instrumental in their entire household's salvation. . . . If God can transform cosmic entropy and malice alike into fire that purifies rather than destroys, how much more can He do with actions of well-intentioned but less-than-perfect [humans].”6 We can do our best knowing that the Atonement is always there to sift away the tares from our wheat.It is not reasonable to expect ourselves or anyone else to have completely mastered the art of receiving and interpreting the communication with the Spirit any more than it is for us to assume that even perfect communication would lead to results that would benefit everyone without exception every time. Instead, we rely on the atonement of our Savior to cover what we are unable to do. As students of divine, merciful heavenly parents, we can give ourselves and others the grace of knowing that everyone is trying their best. We can, and should, be anxiously engaged in good causes, like the works of anti-racism, gender parity, and creating safer spaces for members of our eternal family that are part of the LGBTQ community. We should seek to address poverty, public health, and accessibility concerns. As we consider our own areas of expertise and interest and counsel with heaven on how we might do good, we can expect that opportunities will arise.It is my testimony that when we act on our impulses to do good, whether the reality of the source of that inspiration is the result of direct divine interaction or our own impulses, our heavenly parents and beloved older brother will do their part to ensure that all comes to right. Thus, we can move forward with confidence while striving to be meek and humble enough to receive correction when it comes. In doing so, we continue our work as co-creators and partners with heaven in the work of building Zion.","PeriodicalId":11232,"journal":{"name":"Dialogue","volume":"329 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dialogue","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5406/15549399.56.1.25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When I was about twelve, yet another retelling of the Cinderella story was released into theatres in a magic-free but nonetheless magical version called Ever After. One of my favorite scenes in this film involves the prince pacing along a riverbank, bemoaning the challenge of finding his true love to Leonardo da Vinci. He asks the great Renaissance man, How can you be certain to find [the right person]? And if you find them, are they really the one for you, or do you only think they are? What if the person you're meant to be with never appears? Or she does but you're too distracted to notice? You learn to pay attention. Then, let's say God puts two people on earth, and they are lucky enough to find one another. But one of them gets hit by lightning. Well, then, what? Is that it? Or perchance you meet someone new and marry again. Is that the lady you should be with, or was it the first? When the two of them are side by side, were they both the one for you and you just met the first one first? Or is the second one supposed to be first?1An understandably exasperated da Vinci tells the prince that he needs to learn to pay attention and not leave everything to fate. In other words, he needs to quit worrying about making the one right choice and just choose.Knowing how to make good decisions can be rather overwhelming and perhaps lead us to the petrified paranoia of indecision, too afraid of getting it wrong to move forward with faith. In seeking out answers on how to understand and recognize the voice of God, the scriptures and the prophets have offered plenty of advice. For instance, many prophets have suggested the pattern of searching the scriptures, meditating upon the answer, and praying for clarification. Simple. But how do we know that we have received an answer? In section 8 of the Doctrine and Covenants, Joseph Smith reveals to Oliver Cowdery that he will be told “in [his] mind and in [his] heart” what to do (D&C 8:2, emphasis added). Another revelation refers to Oliver as being enlightened in his mind alone (D&C 6:15). To complicate matters, President Harold B. Lee once said, “When your heart begins to tell you things that your mind does not, then you are getting the Spirit of the Lord,” in direct contrast to additional counsel that Oliver was given.2 Should we wait to feel peace of mind? Of heart? Of both?Other scriptures speak of hearing an internal voice—sometimes a loud one, more often still or small—or of finding insight through the written word of God. We might listen to music, experience feelings of peace, or a more intense “burning of the bosom.” Answers may come through time alone or in the company of others. In other words: there are so many possible avenues through which we can receive divine counsel that we may find that, like Prince Henry in Ever After, we end up stuck pacing along a riverbank trying desperately to know whether or not we have received the answer we sought for, too anxious about making the wrong decision to act at all.We are not alone in feeling at times unsure about the promptings we receive. Consider the story of Nephi. Nephi, raised as a Jew in the same household as his father, the prophet Lehi, would have known that God had commanded his people not to kill. And yet he found himself at the feet of a drunken Laban being prompted to kill the man who stood between him and access to the records of his ancestry. Three times the Spirit “constrains” Nephi with the instruction to kill Laban, leaving Nephi literally shaking at the thought. The word “constrain” is not “still” or “small.” It suggests boldness and urgency. Its Latin root refers to being shackled. The later French definition defines “constraining” as exerting force, physical or moral, upon another being. This is no subtle voice of instruction but a powerful and immediate contradiction to what Nephi had previously understood as immutable truth. Nephi listens to this counsel and must reconcile two conflicting instructions. The first was the commandment not to kill. The second was the immediate instruction to retrieve the record in order to perpetuate the gospel among his descendants. He follows the counsel of the Spirit in that moment and slays Laban, thus preserving important information for his family.Another example comes from Mother Eve, also presented with conflicting instructions. She and Adam are told to multiply and replenish the earth, to take care of the garden, and to enjoy every benefit the garden had for them except for the fruit from the tree of knowledge of good and evil. Eve eventually recognizes that in order to fulfill God's plan, she and Adam need to leave their temporary paradise and sacrifice ignorance for knowledge and ease for labor. They cannot follow both instructions: she is able to study out these choices in her mind and make a decision, accepting the consequences of that choice, both good and bad.We can also look to the story of Abraham and the near sacrifice of his son, Isaac. Although often portrayed as a young boy in art, religious scholars suggest instead that Isaac was a grown man by this time and as much a participant as Abraham was in climbing Mount Moriah and onto the alter that his father had built. This instruction must have been not only confusing to Abraham and Isaac but utterly devastating to both Abraham and Sarah, after so many years of living without children. Yet even when inspired to do the unthinkable, Abraham and Isaac move forward with full intent to follow through on the instruction they receive. Abraham's knife is literally in the air above Isaac before the Spirit “called unto him out of heaven” (Genesis 22:11) to spare Isaac's life.From these stories and others, we learn that while a spirit of peace or joy or comfort may come from following the promptings of the Spirit, that does not necessarily mean that the action we feel inspired to take will always be inherently comfortable or uncomplicated. The instruction may not even make immediate sense or could seem contradictory to what we have previously felt to be true. To follow the Spirit, we may have to be as my landlord Brother Duffin said so eloquently to me this week, a bit “crazy, cuckoo bonkers.” We must do what is right and let the consequence follow, even if that consequence may be murky or unfathomable. We may not be called to mountain heights or stormy seas—but we might be. We must be prepared to travel waters and paths both familiar to us and unfamiliar to seemingly anyone.How do we know, then, that we act in good faith with the Spirit when we make decisions that may seem firmly in the land of the crazy, cuckoo, and bonkers? I believe that one of the most important first steps we can take is to free ourselves of the belief that we will ever make a decision in our lives that is free of consequences that are both good and bad. This is part of the fabric of the human experience. We will never make decisions that do not ripple outward into the universe positively and negatively. Part of both receiving and acting upon personal revelation requires us to abandon the notion that we are in control of either the answers we receive from the divine or the consequences of following those promptings.The great philosopher Aristotle once said that that which is created cannot be free. This means, as Fiona and Terryl Givens explain, “that agency could not exist, let alone flourish, if we were created beings. (The creator is responsible for the nature [and failures] of the created, whether cookies, a bridge, or a human soul.)” Because agency is so essential to every piece of God's plan, this suggests that we are not simply “willing subjects of the Father's plan but collaborators in its very inception.”3As collaborators in this plan, we can take comfort in expecting that God will continue to collaborate along with us as we stumble along with the tasks of continuing the restoration of the gospel and in gathering Zion. God's plan centers around us using our agency to be anxiously engaged in good causes and in doing many things of our own free will.4 Parley Pratt taught that our decisions and personal preferences “are the very mainsprings of life and happiness—they are the cement of all virtuous and heavenly society. . . . Aided and directed by the light of heaven . . . every affection, attribute, power and energy or your body and mind may be cultivated, increased, enlarged, perfected . . . for the glory and happiness of yourself and all of those whose good fortune it may be to be associated with you.”5 Our particular spheres of influence and interest will directly relate to the way in which we connect with heaven. This can lead to some beautiful and individualized ways in which we draw closer to our heavenly parents and the language through which they speak to us. For instance, I find that I am just as likely to find answers to my prayers through study of the scriptures as I am in an excellent book, in a theatre, or in a symphony.On the other hand, there are many ways in which instruction from God can become a bit lost in translation. We can overshoot the mark, misunderstand, or misapply instructions and become inadvertent pharisees, promoting what with think to be right but instead causing harm. I'm reminded of the lessons I heard when I was younger about girls who have had sex before marriage being like a chewed piece of gum no one wants, for instance, or the racist and false messages from years ago about Black members of the Church not receiving the priesthood because of the mark of Cain. In our desire to apply the gospel, we may make small or much more serious errors.We can take comfort in knowing that God has prepared to assist us in making corrections. In fact, the role of our heavenly parents is, in part, to make order from our mess. Fiona and Terryl Givens also suggest that “[God's] divine energies are spent not in precluding chaos but in reordering it, not in preventing suffering, but in alchemizing it, not in disallowing error but in transmuting it into goodness. Satan's unhindered efforts in the garden were simply assimilated into God's greater purpose. The malice of the biblical Joseph's brothers became instrumental in their entire household's salvation. . . . If God can transform cosmic entropy and malice alike into fire that purifies rather than destroys, how much more can He do with actions of well-intentioned but less-than-perfect [humans].”6 We can do our best knowing that the Atonement is always there to sift away the tares from our wheat.It is not reasonable to expect ourselves or anyone else to have completely mastered the art of receiving and interpreting the communication with the Spirit any more than it is for us to assume that even perfect communication would lead to results that would benefit everyone without exception every time. Instead, we rely on the atonement of our Savior to cover what we are unable to do. As students of divine, merciful heavenly parents, we can give ourselves and others the grace of knowing that everyone is trying their best. We can, and should, be anxiously engaged in good causes, like the works of anti-racism, gender parity, and creating safer spaces for members of our eternal family that are part of the LGBTQ community. We should seek to address poverty, public health, and accessibility concerns. As we consider our own areas of expertise and interest and counsel with heaven on how we might do good, we can expect that opportunities will arise.It is my testimony that when we act on our impulses to do good, whether the reality of the source of that inspiration is the result of direct divine interaction or our own impulses, our heavenly parents and beloved older brother will do their part to ensure that all comes to right. Thus, we can move forward with confidence while striving to be meek and humble enough to receive correction when it comes. In doing so, we continue our work as co-creators and partners with heaven in the work of building Zion.
反思的启示
在我大约十二岁的时候,《灰姑娘》故事的另一个重述版本在影院上映了,它没有魔法,但仍然很神奇,叫做《从此以后》。在这部电影中,我最喜欢的一个场景是王子沿着河岸踱步,哀叹寻找莱昂纳多·达·芬奇真爱的挑战。他问这位伟大的文艺复兴时期的人,你怎么能确定找到[合适的人]?如果你找到了他们,他们真的是你的真命天子吗,还是你只是以为他们是?如果你命中注定要在一起的人从未出现过怎么办?或者她有,但你太分心了没注意到?你要学会集中注意力。然后,假设上帝把两个人放在地球上,他们很幸运地找到了彼此。但其中一个被闪电击中了。好吧,然后呢?就是这样吗?或者你可能会遇到新的人,然后再次结婚。你应该和她在一起吗,还是第一个?当他们俩并排在一起的时候,他们是不是都是你的真命天子,而你只是先遇到了第一个?还是说第二个应该是第一个?可以理解,达·芬奇恼怒地告诉王子,他需要学会集中注意力,不要把一切都交给命运。换句话说,他需要停止担心做出正确的选择,而只是选择。知道如何做出正确的决定可能会让人不知所措,也许会让我们陷入优柔寡断的僵化偏执,太害怕犯错而不敢带着信念前进。在寻找如何理解和识别上帝声音的答案时,圣经和先知们提供了大量的建议。例如,许多先知提出了搜索经文,冥想答案,祈祷澄清的模式。简单。但是我们怎么知道我们已经得到了答案呢?在教义和圣约的第8部分,约瑟·斯密向奥利佛·考德利透露,他将“在[他的]头脑和[他的]内心”被告知该做什么(教约8:2,强调添加)。另一个启示指的是奥立弗只有在他的头脑中被启发(教约6:15)。更复杂的是,哈罗德·李会长曾经说过:“当你的心开始告诉你头脑没有告诉你的事情时,你就得到了主的灵。”这与奥利弗得到的额外建议形成鲜明对比我们是不是应该等着感受内心的平静?的心?这两个吗?其他经文提到听到内心的声音——有时是响亮的声音,但更多的时候是安静或微小的声音——或者通过上帝的书面话语找到洞察力。我们可能会听音乐,体验和平的感觉,或者更强烈的“燃烧的胸膛”。答案可能会在独处或与他人相处的过程中得到。换句话说:我们可以通过很多可能的途径获得神的建议,我们可能会发现,就像《从此以后》中的亨利王子一样,我们最终会在河岸上徘徊,拼命地想知道我们是否得到了我们所寻求的答案,太担心做出错误的决定而根本没有采取行动。我们并不是唯一一个有时对我们收到的提示感到不确定的人。想想尼腓的故事。尼腓是犹太人,和他的父亲先知李海在同一个家庭长大,他应该知道上帝命令他的子民不要杀人。然而,他发现自己站在一个喝醉酒的拉班的脚下,拉班被怂恿杀死了挡在他中间的人,使他无法得到他祖先的记录。圣灵三次“约束”尼腓,命令他杀死拉班,让尼腓一想到这个就发抖。“约束”这个词不是“静止”或“小”。它暗示着大胆和急迫。它的拉丁词根指的是被束缚。后来的法语定义将“约束”定义为对另一个人施加身体或道德上的力量。这不是一种微妙的教导,而是对尼腓先前所理解的永恒真理的有力而直接的反驳。尼腓听了这个忠告,必须调和两个相互矛盾的指示。第一条是不可杀人的诫命。第二个是立即指示要取回记录,以便在他的后代中延续福音。在那一刻,他听从了圣灵的建议,杀死了拉班,从而为他的家人保留了重要的信息。另一个例子来自《夏娃母亲》,同样呈现了相互矛盾的指示。她和亚当被告知要繁殖和充实大地,照顾好花园,享受花园给他们的一切好处,除了分别善恶树上的果子。夏娃最终意识到,为了完成上帝的计划,她和亚当需要离开他们暂时的天堂,牺牲无知换取知识,牺牲安逸换取劳动。他们不能同时遵循两个指示:她能够在脑海中研究出这些选择并做出决定,接受选择的后果,无论是好是坏。我们也可以看看亚伯拉罕和他儿子以撒献祭的故事。 虽然在艺术中经常被描绘成一个小男孩,但宗教学者认为,以撒在这个时候已经是一个成年人了,就像亚伯拉罕一样,他也参与了攀登摩利亚山和登上他父亲建造的圣坛。这条指示不仅让亚伯拉罕和以撒感到困惑,而且对亚伯拉罕和撒拉来说也是毁灭性的打击,因为他们多年来一直没有孩子。然而,即使受到鼓舞去做不可思议的事情,亚伯拉罕和以撒也会全心全意地按照他们收到的指示前进。在圣灵“从天上呼召他”(创世记22:11)饶恕以撒之前,亚伯拉罕的刀确实在以撒上方的空中。从这些故事和其他故事中,我们了解到,虽然和平,快乐或安慰的精神可能来自跟随圣灵的提示,但这并不一定意味着我们感到受到启发的行动总是天生舒适或简单。这条指令甚至可能无法立即理解,或者看起来与我们之前所认为的事实相矛盾。要跟随圣灵,我们可能得像我的房东达芬弟兄这周对我说的那样,有点“疯狂、疯疯癫癫”。我们必须做正确的事,让结果随之而来,即使这个结果可能是模糊的或深不可测的。我们也许不会被召唤到高山上或暴风雨的海上——但我们可能会。我们必须准备好穿越我们熟悉的水域和道路,而似乎任何人都不熟悉。那么,我们如何知道,当我们在疯狂、疯癫和疯子的土地上做出看似坚定的决定时,我们是凭着圣灵的诚意行事的呢?我认为,我们可以采取的最重要的第一步之一就是让自己摆脱这样的信念,即我们在生活中所做的决定不会产生好的和坏的后果。这是人类经历的一部分。我们所做的决定不会对宇宙产生积极或消极的影响。接受和行动个人启示的一部分要求我们放弃这样的观念,即我们可以控制从神那里得到的答案或遵循这些提示的结果。伟大的哲学家亚里士多德曾经说过,被创造出来的东西不可能是免费的。这意味着,正如菲奥娜和泰瑞尔·吉文斯解释的那样,“如果我们是被创造的生物,那么这种代理就不可能存在,更不用说繁荣了。”(造物主要为被造物的本性(和失败)负责,无论是饼干、桥梁还是人的灵魂)”因为能动性对上帝计划的每一个部分都是如此重要,这表明我们不仅仅是“天父计划的自愿臣民,而是从一开始就是合作者。作为这个计划的合作者,我们可以放心地期待,当我们在继续复兴福音和聚集锡安的任务中跌跌撞撞时,上帝会继续与我们合作。神的计划以我们为中心,利用我们的能动性,热切地从事公益事业,做许多我们自愿做的事情帕利·普拉特教导我们,我们的决定和个人偏好“是生活和幸福的主要源泉——它们是所有美德和天堂社会的水泥. . . .。在天堂之光的帮助和指引下…你的身体和心灵的每一种情感、属性、力量和能量都可以被培养、增加、扩大、完善……为了你自己的荣耀和幸福,也为了那些可能与你有好运的人。我们特定的影响范围和兴趣将直接关系到我们与天堂的联系方式。这可以带来一些美丽和个性化的方式,让我们更接近天上的父母和他们对我们说话的语言。例如,我发现通过研读经文,就像我在一本好书、一场戏剧或一首交响乐中找到答案一样,我的祈祷也能得到解答。另一方面,从神而来的指示在很多方面可能会在翻译中被误解。我们可能会过分,误解或误用指示,成为无意的法利赛人,促进我们认为正确的事情,而不是造成伤害。我想起了我年轻时听到的教训,例如,婚前发生性行为的女孩就像一块被咀嚼过的口香糖,没有人想要,或者几年前关于教会的黑人成员因为该隐的印记而不能接受祭司职位的种族主义和错误信息。在我们应用福音的愿望中,我们可能会犯小错误或严重得多的错误。我们可以感到安慰,因为知道神已经准备好帮助我们改正错误。事实上,在某种程度上,我们天上的父母的角色就是整理我们的烂摊子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dialogue
Dialogue Social Sciences-Development
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: Dialogue is the official journal of the Canadian Philosophical Association. Its purpose is to publish high quality peer-reviewed scholarly articles, book symposia, critical notices, and book reviews in English and in French, in support of the Association"s mandate to promote philosophical scholarship and education. It is open to contributions in all branches of philosophy and from any philosophical perspective. Readers include professional teachers of philosophy, graduate students, and others with an interest in the field. Published for the Canadian Philosophical Association
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信