Reliability of Response-Controlled Stepped Sine Testing for Experimental Detection of Nonlinear Structure

IF 1 Q4 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
M. A. Yunus, None A.R. Bahari, None M.N. Abdul Rani, None Z. Yahya, None M.A. Rahim
{"title":"Reliability of Response-Controlled Stepped Sine Testing for Experimental Detection of Nonlinear Structure","authors":"M. A. Yunus, None A.R. Bahari, None M.N. Abdul Rani, None Z. Yahya, None M.A. Rahim","doi":"10.15282/ijame.20.3.2023.05.0819","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nonlinear structural dynamic analysis is required for mechanical structures experiencing nonlinearity through large force-vibration response ranges. Nonlinearities can be caused by large vibration displacements, material properties, or joints. Experimental modal analysis for nonlinear detection is achieved using conventional force-controlled stepped sine testing. However, this approach often encounters premature jumps in frequency response curves before reaching actual resonance peaks. In recent years, response-controlled stepped sine testing (RCT) has been introduced to precisely quantify resonant peaks. This approach, however, has only been limitedly utilised to detect and analyse nonlinearity in jointed structures and structures experiencing large displacement. In this paper, the reliability of the RCT approach is assessed for detecting nonlinearity from different sources. The experimental setup involves placing two magnets on opposite sides of a plate's free end to induce localised nonlinearity through magnet attraction. A low force magnitude of random excitation is employed to identify the frequency range of the first vibration mode using an electromagnetic shaker. Subsequently, RCT is performed within this range to measure the nonlinear forced response. Frequency response functions are measured at ten different controlled displacement amplitudes at the driving point. The analysis observed a symmetry curve of response in the measured FRFs. The results indicate that nonlinear hardening is detected at structures with localised magnet attraction. In conclusion, the reliability of applying the RCT approach for detecting nonlinearity from magnet attraction is achieved due to the absence of a jump issue in FRFs.","PeriodicalId":13935,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15282/ijame.20.3.2023.05.0819","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nonlinear structural dynamic analysis is required for mechanical structures experiencing nonlinearity through large force-vibration response ranges. Nonlinearities can be caused by large vibration displacements, material properties, or joints. Experimental modal analysis for nonlinear detection is achieved using conventional force-controlled stepped sine testing. However, this approach often encounters premature jumps in frequency response curves before reaching actual resonance peaks. In recent years, response-controlled stepped sine testing (RCT) has been introduced to precisely quantify resonant peaks. This approach, however, has only been limitedly utilised to detect and analyse nonlinearity in jointed structures and structures experiencing large displacement. In this paper, the reliability of the RCT approach is assessed for detecting nonlinearity from different sources. The experimental setup involves placing two magnets on opposite sides of a plate's free end to induce localised nonlinearity through magnet attraction. A low force magnitude of random excitation is employed to identify the frequency range of the first vibration mode using an electromagnetic shaker. Subsequently, RCT is performed within this range to measure the nonlinear forced response. Frequency response functions are measured at ten different controlled displacement amplitudes at the driving point. The analysis observed a symmetry curve of response in the measured FRFs. The results indicate that nonlinear hardening is detected at structures with localised magnet attraction. In conclusion, the reliability of applying the RCT approach for detecting nonlinearity from magnet attraction is achieved due to the absence of a jump issue in FRFs.
响应控制阶跃正弦测试在非线性结构实验检测中的可靠性
在大的力振响应范围内经历非线性的机械结构,需要进行非线性结构动力分析。非线性可以由大的振动位移、材料特性或关节引起。非线性检测的实验模态分析采用传统的力控制阶跃正弦测试。然而,这种方法经常在达到实际共振峰之前遇到频率响应曲线的过早跳跃。近年来,响应控制阶跃正弦测试(RCT)被引入以精确量化谐振峰。然而,这种方法仅被有限地用于检测和分析节理结构和大位移结构的非线性。本文评估了RCT方法用于检测不同来源的非线性的可靠性。实验设置包括在一个板的自由端相对的两侧放置两个磁铁,通过磁铁吸引来诱导局部非线性。使用电磁激振器,采用低强度的随机激励力来识别第一振动模态的频率范围。随后,在此范围内进行RCT以测量非线性强迫响应。频率响应函数在驱动点的十个不同的控制位移幅值下测量。分析观察到在测量的频响响应的对称曲线。结果表明,在局部磁铁吸引下,结构发生了非线性硬化。综上所述,由于frf中没有跳跃问题,应用RCT方法检测磁体吸引力非线性的可靠性得以实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The IJAME provides the forum for high-quality research communications and addresses all aspects of original experimental information based on theory and their applications. This journal welcomes all contributions from those who wish to report on new developments in automotive and mechanical engineering fields within the following scopes. -Engine/Emission Technology Automobile Body and Safety- Vehicle Dynamics- Automotive Electronics- Alternative Energy- Energy Conversion- Fuels and Lubricants - Combustion and Reacting Flows- New and Renewable Energy Technologies- Automotive Electrical Systems- Automotive Materials- Automotive Transmission- Automotive Pollution and Control- Vehicle Maintenance- Intelligent Vehicle/Transportation Systems- Fuel Cell, Hybrid, Electrical Vehicle and Other Fields of Automotive Engineering- Engineering Management /TQM- Heat and Mass Transfer- Fluid and Thermal Engineering- CAE/FEA/CAD/CFD- Engineering Mechanics- Modeling and Simulation- Metallurgy/ Materials Engineering- Applied Mechanics- Thermodynamics- Agricultural Machinery and Equipment- Mechatronics- Automatic Control- Multidisciplinary design and optimization - Fluid Mechanics and Dynamics- Thermal-Fluids Machinery- Experimental and Computational Mechanics - Measurement and Instrumentation- HVAC- Manufacturing Systems- Materials Processing- Noise and Vibration- Composite and Polymer Materials- Biomechanical Engineering- Fatigue and Fracture Mechanics- Machine Components design- Gas Turbine- Power Plant Engineering- Artificial Intelligent/Neural Network- Robotic Systems- Solar Energy- Powder Metallurgy and Metal Ceramics- Discrete Systems- Non-linear Analysis- Structural Analysis- Tribology- Engineering Materials- Mechanical Systems and Technology- Pneumatic and Hydraulic Systems - Failure Analysis- Any other related topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信