Lost in Translation: Information Asymmetry as a Barrier to Accrual of Transfer Student Capital

IF 1.7 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Dustin M. Grote, Amy J. Richardson, Walter C. Lee, David B. Knight, Kaylynn Hill, Hannah Glisson, Bevlee A. Watford
{"title":"Lost in Translation: Information Asymmetry as a Barrier to Accrual of Transfer Student Capital","authors":"Dustin M. Grote, Amy J. Richardson, Walter C. Lee, David B. Knight, Kaylynn Hill, Hannah Glisson, Bevlee A. Watford","doi":"10.1177/00915521231201208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Transfer student capital (TSC) helps community college students realize the potential for the transfer pathway to serve as a lower-cost option to a bachelor’s degree. However, students’ accrual of TSC depends on the quality and quantity of information networks and infrastructure; information asymmetry in these networks can impede students’ transfer progress. Methods: Using interview data from stakeholders who support engineering transfer students at one research university and two community college partners, we apply a methodology that combines qualitative coding techniques (i.e., descriptive, process, and evaluative coding) with network and pathway analyses to explore an information network for coursework transfer in engineering. Results: Our findings illustrate the disjointed and complex web of information sources that transfer students may use to accrue TSC. We highlight pathways fraught with information asymmetry as well as information sources and processes that give promise to students’ ability to accrue TSC and successfully navigate transfer of coursework vertically. Conclusions: An abundance of information sources and paths does not equate to a better transfer system. Utilizing network analysis to visualize and evaluate information sources and processes provides an additional method for evaluating information systems for transfer. Consolidating information sources or improving processes linking information sources could improve inefficiencies in transfer students’ transitions.","PeriodicalId":46564,"journal":{"name":"Community College Review","volume":"65 10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community College Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00915521231201208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Transfer student capital (TSC) helps community college students realize the potential for the transfer pathway to serve as a lower-cost option to a bachelor’s degree. However, students’ accrual of TSC depends on the quality and quantity of information networks and infrastructure; information asymmetry in these networks can impede students’ transfer progress. Methods: Using interview data from stakeholders who support engineering transfer students at one research university and two community college partners, we apply a methodology that combines qualitative coding techniques (i.e., descriptive, process, and evaluative coding) with network and pathway analyses to explore an information network for coursework transfer in engineering. Results: Our findings illustrate the disjointed and complex web of information sources that transfer students may use to accrue TSC. We highlight pathways fraught with information asymmetry as well as information sources and processes that give promise to students’ ability to accrue TSC and successfully navigate transfer of coursework vertically. Conclusions: An abundance of information sources and paths does not equate to a better transfer system. Utilizing network analysis to visualize and evaluate information sources and processes provides an additional method for evaluating information systems for transfer. Consolidating information sources or improving processes linking information sources could improve inefficiencies in transfer students’ transitions.
迷失在翻译中:信息不对称是阻碍转校生资本积累的障碍
目的:转学资本(TSC)帮助社区大学学生实现转学途径作为获得学士学位的低成本选择的潜力。然而,学生的TSC积累取决于信息网络和基础设施的质量和数量;这些网络中的信息不对称会阻碍学生的迁移进程。方法:利用来自一所研究型大学和两所社区学院合作伙伴的支持工程转校生的利益相关者的访谈数据,我们采用了一种将定性编码技术(即描述性、过程性和评估性编码)与网络和路径分析相结合的方法来探索工程课程转移的信息网络。结果:我们的研究结果说明了转学生可能使用的不连贯和复杂的信息来源网络来积累TSC。我们强调了充满信息不对称的途径,以及信息来源和过程,这些途径和过程保证了学生积累TSC的能力,并成功地引导课程作业的垂直转移。结论:信息源和途径的丰富并不等同于更好的传递系统。利用网络分析来可视化和评估信息源和过程,为评估信息系统的传输提供了一种额外的方法。整合信息源或改进连接信息源的流程可以改善转校生转换的低效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Community College Review
Community College Review EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: The Community College Review (CCR) has led the nation for over 35 years in the publication of scholarly, peer-reviewed research and commentary on community colleges. CCR welcomes manuscripts dealing with all aspects of community college administration, education, and policy, both within the American higher education system as well as within the higher education systems of other countries that have similar tertiary institutions. All submitted manuscripts undergo a blind review. When manuscripts are not accepted for publication, we offer suggestions for how they might be revised. The ultimate intent is to further discourse about community colleges, their students, and the educators and administrators who work within these institutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信