Academic Procrastination of Spanish Pre-service Teachers during the COVID-19 Pandemic

IF 1.7 3区心理学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH

Psicologia Educativa Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.5093/psed2023a17

Luis J. Martín-Antón, María C. Saiz-Manzanares, Paula Molinero-González, Wendy L. Arteaga-Cedeño, Alberto Soto-Sánchez, Miguel A. Carbonero

{"title":"Academic Procrastination of Spanish Pre-service Teachers during the COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"Luis J. Martín-Antón, María C. Saiz-Manzanares, Paula Molinero-González, Wendy L. Arteaga-Cedeño, Alberto Soto-Sánchez, Miguel A. Carbonero","doi":"10.5093/psed2023a17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study seeks to ascertain whether the academic procrastination of university pre-service teachers varied during the COVID-19 pandemic when compared to data collected from another sample (n = 794) taken before the pandemic, and the reasons that might explain this. 910 pre-service teachers responded to the PASS scale, Academic Procrastination Scale, Unintentional Procrastination Scale, Active Procrastination Scale, and the New General Self-Efficacy Scale during the pandemic. The results reflect greater procrastination than for the pre-pandemic sample; 37.8&percnt; felt that their procrastination had increased due to the pandemic, which was more evident amongst women, whereas 8.7&percnt; reported having procrastinated less, displaying the highest level of self-efficacy. In both instances, the most commonly alleged reasons were greater time management, together with changes they were forced to make in their study habits. We discuss the implications that might need to be considered when planning and organizing teaching, should a similar situation occur again.","PeriodicalId":45361,"journal":{"name":"Psicologia Educativa","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psicologia Educativa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5093/psed2023a17","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study seeks to ascertain whether the academic procrastination of university pre-service teachers varied during the COVID-19 pandemic when compared to data collected from another sample (n = 794) taken before the pandemic, and the reasons that might explain this. 910 pre-service teachers responded to the PASS scale, Academic Procrastination Scale, Unintentional Procrastination Scale, Active Procrastination Scale, and the New General Self-Efficacy Scale during the pandemic. The results reflect greater procrastination than for the pre-pandemic sample; 37.8% felt that their procrastination had increased due to the pandemic, which was more evident amongst women, whereas 8.7% reported having procrastinated less, displaying the highest level of self-efficacy. In both instances, the most commonly alleged reasons were greater time management, together with changes they were forced to make in their study habits. We discuss the implications that might need to be considered when planning and organizing teaching, should a similar situation occur again.

查看原文本刊更多论文

新冠肺炎疫情期间西班牙职前教师的学业拖延

本研究旨在确定大学职前教师的学业拖延症在COVID-19大流行期间是否与大流行前收集的另一个样本(n = 794)的数据有所不同，以及可能解释这一现象的原因。910名职前教师在大流行期间对PASS量表、学业拖延量表、无意拖延量表、主动拖延量表和新一般自我效能量表进行了问卷调查。与大流行前的样本相比，结果反映出更大的拖延;37.8 %认为由于大流行，他们的拖延症增加了，这在妇女中更为明显，而8.7%;报告说，他们拖延的次数更少，表现出最高水平的自我效能。在这两种情况下，最常见的原因是更好的时间管理，以及他们被迫在学习习惯上做出的改变。我们讨论了在计划和组织教学时可能需要考虑的影响，如果类似的情况再次发生。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Psicologia Educativa Multiple-

CiteScore

3.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

29 weeks

期刊介绍： La Revista Psicología Educativa es una revista científico-profesional española, de carácter multidisciplinar, que promueve tanto la aportación teórica como la investigación experimental y profesional del psicólogo y profesiones afines en el ámbito educativo. Su objetivo es compartir temas de común interés en procesos cognitivos, afectivos y culturales en la adquisición de conocimiento, como en áreas de intervención e innovación educativa. Por ello invita a investigadores relacionados con el ámbito educativo (psicólogos, antropólogos, sociólogos, tecnólogos educativos, TCs) a educadores y orientadores en diversos ámbitos, a psicólogos educativos, a evaluadores, a técnicos de computación y tecnologías de la información aplicadas a la educación a enviar sus trabajos a esta revista. Psicología Educativa acepta manuscritos inéditos y originales de interés para los psicólogos y que sean una contribución al conocimiento correspondiente al ámbito de la Psicología de la Educación. Psicología Educativa publica principalmente en castellano, pero admite contribuciones originales en inglés. Revista Psicología Educativa publica principalmente en castellano, pero admite igualmente contribuciones originales en inglés. La revista admite originales libres y también puede solicitar trabajos específicos a autores relevantes. Los manuscritos originales recibidos en castellano o inglés serán sometidos al proceso de revisión externa por expertos, anónima por pares doble ciego (Peer Review). En función de las valoraciones de los expertos, el equipo directivo de la revista tomará la decisión sobre los artículos que podrán ser aceptados, rechazados o solicitadas modificaciones para la mejora de los mismos y la aceptación o rechazo definitivos. Los autores que envían su trabajo a la revista, nunca lo deben postular simultáneamente a otras publicaciones.