Julius Ceazar G. Tolentino, Catherine G. Danganan, Adonis A. David, Jenelyn T. Peña
{"title":"Development and Validation of a Booklet in Educational Research: A Supplementary Material for Filipino Teacher Education Students","authors":"Julius Ceazar G. Tolentino, Catherine G. Danganan, Adonis A. David, Jenelyn T. Peña","doi":"10.4995/muse.2023.18678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the recent revitalization of the teacher education programs in the Philippines, along with the implementation of outcomes-based education, the teaching of research among pre-service teachers has been a challenge for teacher educators to achieve expected outcomes and competencies. Through this research and development study, a booklet for undergraduate teacher education research was developed and subjected to validation by experts and intended users from a state-run university in Central Luzon, Philippines. Its paramount aim is to further intensify and deliver a more efficient and effective teaching and learning method for undergraduate research subjects through this supplementary learning material. The developmental process was guided by the analysis-design-development-implementation-evaluation (ADDIE) model. Results indicated that in general, instructional materials in undergraduate research are slightly available and slightly adequate as perceived by the respondents. There is also a need to develop a booklet specifically on topics under research methodology. The 4E x 2 model was adopted as an instructional design. Expert validators confirmed that the booklet was very much acceptable in terms of adequacy, coherence, appropriateness, and usefulness. The pre-service teachers evaluated the material, its modules, and lessons with much acceptability. Considering these, the validated material as an output of the study could serve as a potential supplementary material to facilitate learning critical content in educational research among intended users. Further review may be initiated, and mass testing of the material is recommended.","PeriodicalId":52061,"journal":{"name":"Multidisciplinary Journal for Education Social and Technological Sciences","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multidisciplinary Journal for Education Social and Technological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4995/muse.2023.18678","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
With the recent revitalization of the teacher education programs in the Philippines, along with the implementation of outcomes-based education, the teaching of research among pre-service teachers has been a challenge for teacher educators to achieve expected outcomes and competencies. Through this research and development study, a booklet for undergraduate teacher education research was developed and subjected to validation by experts and intended users from a state-run university in Central Luzon, Philippines. Its paramount aim is to further intensify and deliver a more efficient and effective teaching and learning method for undergraduate research subjects through this supplementary learning material. The developmental process was guided by the analysis-design-development-implementation-evaluation (ADDIE) model. Results indicated that in general, instructional materials in undergraduate research are slightly available and slightly adequate as perceived by the respondents. There is also a need to develop a booklet specifically on topics under research methodology. The 4E x 2 model was adopted as an instructional design. Expert validators confirmed that the booklet was very much acceptable in terms of adequacy, coherence, appropriateness, and usefulness. The pre-service teachers evaluated the material, its modules, and lessons with much acceptability. Considering these, the validated material as an output of the study could serve as a potential supplementary material to facilitate learning critical content in educational research among intended users. Further review may be initiated, and mass testing of the material is recommended.
随着最近菲律宾教师教育项目的复兴,以及基于结果的教育的实施,职前教师的研究教学对教师教育工作者来说是一个挑战,以达到预期的结果和能力。通过这项研究和开发研究,菲律宾吕宋岛中部一所国立大学的专家和预期用户编写了一本本科教师教育研究手册,并进行了验证。其最重要的目的是通过这些补充学习材料,进一步加强和提供更有效的本科研究科目的教学方法。开发过程以分析-设计-开发-实现-评估(ADDIE)模型为指导。结果显示,总体而言,被调查者认为本科研究的教学材料略具可得性,略具充分性。还需要编写一本专门关于研究方法专题的小册子。采用4E x 2模型作为教学设计。专家确认该小册子在充分性、一致性、适当性和有用性方面是非常可接受的。职前教师对材料、模块和课程进行了评估,并给予了很大的接受度。考虑到这些,作为研究输出的验证材料可以作为潜在的补充材料,以促进预期用户学习教育研究中的关键内容。可能会开始进一步的审查,并建议对材料进行大规模测试。