Exploring Caseload Data of Vision Professionals and Their Implications

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 REHABILITATION
Kim T. Zebehazy, Tina S. Herzberg, Kathryn D. Botsford
{"title":"Exploring Caseload Data of Vision Professionals and Their Implications","authors":"Kim T. Zebehazy, Tina S. Herzberg, Kathryn D. Botsford","doi":"10.1177/0145482x231200869","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: To determine the current and future needs for teachers of students of visual impairments (TVIs), orientation and mobility (O&M) specialists, and dually certified professionals, information about caseloads is needed. However, few current studies exist that provide this data. Methods: The purpose of the study was to analyze demographic and caseload data gathered from 834 professionals who took part in a larger study. Descriptive and inferential statistics compared caseload size averages based on employment status, role, service delivery model, and region. Results: Minimal caseload differences existed among the regions of the United States, based on mean. Average caseload sizes by role reflected past literature. Caseloads ranged between 0 and 107 students, once outliers were removed. Discussion: This study provides some new data that provide insight into current caseloads, but a more expansive study would further contribute to the understanding of service provision for students with visual impairments. Implications for Practitioners: The field of visual impairment should continue to work toward recruiting a more diverse workforce and continue advocacy efforts for reasonable workloads and equitable services for students with visual impairments.","PeriodicalId":47438,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482x231200869","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: To determine the current and future needs for teachers of students of visual impairments (TVIs), orientation and mobility (O&M) specialists, and dually certified professionals, information about caseloads is needed. However, few current studies exist that provide this data. Methods: The purpose of the study was to analyze demographic and caseload data gathered from 834 professionals who took part in a larger study. Descriptive and inferential statistics compared caseload size averages based on employment status, role, service delivery model, and region. Results: Minimal caseload differences existed among the regions of the United States, based on mean. Average caseload sizes by role reflected past literature. Caseloads ranged between 0 and 107 students, once outliers were removed. Discussion: This study provides some new data that provide insight into current caseloads, but a more expansive study would further contribute to the understanding of service provision for students with visual impairments. Implications for Practitioners: The field of visual impairment should continue to work toward recruiting a more diverse workforce and continue advocacy efforts for reasonable workloads and equitable services for students with visual impairments.
探索视力专业人员的病例量数据及其意义
前言:为了确定当前和未来对视障学生教师(TVIs)、定向和移动(O&M)专家和双认证专业人员的需求,需要有关病例量的信息。然而,目前很少有研究提供这些数据。方法:本研究的目的是分析834名专业人员参与的一项更大的研究中收集的人口统计和病例数据。描述性和推断性统计比较了基于就业状况、角色、服务提供模式和地区的平均案件数量。结果:基于平均值,美国各地区之间存在最小的病例量差异。按角色划分的平均案件数量反映了过去的文献。除去异常值后,病例数量在0到107名学生之间。讨论:本研究提供了一些新的数据,为了解当前的病例量提供了见解,但更广泛的研究将进一步有助于理解为视障学生提供的服务。对从业人员的启示:视障领域应继续努力招募更多样化的劳动力,并继续为视障学生争取合理的工作量和公平的服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
18.20%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: The Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness is the essential professional resource for information about visual impairment (that is, blindness or low vision). The international peer-reviewed journal of record in the field, it delivers current research and best practice information, commentary from authoritative experts on critical topics, News From the Field, and a calendar of important events. Practitioners and researchers, policymakers and administrators, counselors and advocates rely on JVIB for its delivery of cutting-edge research and the most up-to-date practices in the field of visual impairment and blindness. Available in print and online 24/7, JVIB offers immediate access to information from the leading researchers, teachers of students with visual impairments (often referred to as TVIs), orientation and mobility (O&M) practitioners, vision rehabilitation therapists (often referred to as VRTs), early interventionists, and low vision therapists (often referred to as LVTs) in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信