Elisabeth Counselman Carpenter, Kevin Lally, Alex Redcay, Wade Luquet
{"title":"The impact of fluid attraction and fluid identity on stress, anxiety, and depression","authors":"Elisabeth Counselman Carpenter, Kevin Lally, Alex Redcay, Wade Luquet","doi":"10.1080/19359705.2023.2265314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractIntroduction This study sought to determine whether gender, fluid identity, and fluid attraction groups differed significantly in stress, depression, and anxiety among LGBTQA + sexual minorities compared to non–sexual minorities.Methods Using the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (Add Health), this study conducted two-way analyses of variance to determine whether male or female sexual minorities had significantly different levels of stress, depression, and anxiety when compared to non–sexual minorities. Individuals were also placed in one of eight groups based on sexual orientation, fluid identity, and fluid attraction to determine whether fluidity played a unique role in contributing to mental health.Results Results showed that both gender and fluidity accounted for 3.7% to 9.7% of the variance in stress (R2 = 4.1%), depression (R2 = 3.7%), and anxiety (R2 = 9.7%). Non–sexual minorities who reported both fluid attraction and fluid identity also reported the highest rate of stress, anxiety, and depression, revealing that fluidity had a unique impact on mental health apart from sexual orientation. This consistent pattern did not occur among sexual minorities. Sexual minorities had varying degrees of stress, depression, and anxiety, depending on the combination of static or fluid attraction or identity.Conclusion Fluid attraction, fluid identity, and gender significantly impacted stress, depression, and anxiety regardless of sexual orientation.Keywords: LGBTQfluid identitystressanxietydepression Ethics statementRutgers University Institutional Review Board (IRB) and Bloomsburg University IRB granted exempt IRB reviews for this study.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Data availability statementThe data supporting these results were derived from the following resources in the public domain: https://addhealth.cpc.unc.edu/data/#public-use.Additional informationFundingThe author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.","PeriodicalId":46675,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gay & Lesbian Mental Health","volume":"125 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gay & Lesbian Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19359705.2023.2265314","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
AbstractIntroduction This study sought to determine whether gender, fluid identity, and fluid attraction groups differed significantly in stress, depression, and anxiety among LGBTQA + sexual minorities compared to non–sexual minorities.Methods Using the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (Add Health), this study conducted two-way analyses of variance to determine whether male or female sexual minorities had significantly different levels of stress, depression, and anxiety when compared to non–sexual minorities. Individuals were also placed in one of eight groups based on sexual orientation, fluid identity, and fluid attraction to determine whether fluidity played a unique role in contributing to mental health.Results Results showed that both gender and fluidity accounted for 3.7% to 9.7% of the variance in stress (R2 = 4.1%), depression (R2 = 3.7%), and anxiety (R2 = 9.7%). Non–sexual minorities who reported both fluid attraction and fluid identity also reported the highest rate of stress, anxiety, and depression, revealing that fluidity had a unique impact on mental health apart from sexual orientation. This consistent pattern did not occur among sexual minorities. Sexual minorities had varying degrees of stress, depression, and anxiety, depending on the combination of static or fluid attraction or identity.Conclusion Fluid attraction, fluid identity, and gender significantly impacted stress, depression, and anxiety regardless of sexual orientation.Keywords: LGBTQfluid identitystressanxietydepression Ethics statementRutgers University Institutional Review Board (IRB) and Bloomsburg University IRB granted exempt IRB reviews for this study.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Data availability statementThe data supporting these results were derived from the following resources in the public domain: https://addhealth.cpc.unc.edu/data/#public-use.Additional informationFundingThe author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.