Downward seepage effects on flow near a L-shape spur dike and bed morphology

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Harish Kumar Patel , Meilan Qi , Bimlesh Kumar
{"title":"Downward seepage effects on flow near a L-shape spur dike and bed morphology","authors":"Harish Kumar Patel ,&nbsp;Meilan Qi ,&nbsp;Bimlesh Kumar","doi":"10.1016/j.ijsrc.2023.11.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Spur dikes are structures built along riverbanks that serve two purposes: stabilizing the banks and minimizing erosion risk by controlling water flow in the river channel. The current study used L-shaped spur dikes in an alluvial channel to analyze the bed morphology and flow pattern in the spur dikes zone with the influence of no-seepage and two distinct seepage velocities, <em>V</em><sub><em>S</em>1</sub> = 0.075 mm/s and <em>V</em><sub><em>S</em>2</sub> = 0.15 mm/s near the channel bed <em>z</em>/<em>h</em> &lt; 0.2. The experimental study was also done to examine and compare the transformation in the local scour depth for the seepage condition. According to the study results, downward seepage movement causes significant modification in the channel's bed elevation and the development of scour depth. Observations indicate that the maximum local scour occurs at the first spur dike's leading edge. Seepage velocity <em>V</em><sub><em>S</em>1</sub> results in a 16.1% increase in the maximum scour depth compared to the no-seepage scenario. In comparison, seepage velocity <em>V</em><sub><em>S</em>2</sub> causes an increase of 25.2% in the maximum scour depth. Due to downward seepage, the flow distribution is shifted down near the channel's boundary. With an increase in the seepage rate, the magnitude of velocity, Reynold shear stress, turbulent kinetic energy, and bed shear stress also rise close to the channel's boundary. The current study also examined bursting events near the channel's bed under seepage and no-seepage conditions. These events included outward interaction, inward interaction, ejection, and sweep. Quadrant analysis of velocimeter data revealed that ejection and sweep were the dominant events contributing to the production of Reynolds shear stress in seepage and no-seepage flows. Meanwhile, outward interactions and inward interactions made minor contributions compared to ejection and sweep events to the Reynolds shear stress.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1001627923000720/pdfft?md5=e39ab8c2f17227ea3c3fe365631bb592&pid=1-s2.0-S1001627923000720-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1001627923000720","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Spur dikes are structures built along riverbanks that serve two purposes: stabilizing the banks and minimizing erosion risk by controlling water flow in the river channel. The current study used L-shaped spur dikes in an alluvial channel to analyze the bed morphology and flow pattern in the spur dikes zone with the influence of no-seepage and two distinct seepage velocities, VS1 = 0.075 mm/s and VS2 = 0.15 mm/s near the channel bed z/h < 0.2. The experimental study was also done to examine and compare the transformation in the local scour depth for the seepage condition. According to the study results, downward seepage movement causes significant modification in the channel's bed elevation and the development of scour depth. Observations indicate that the maximum local scour occurs at the first spur dike's leading edge. Seepage velocity VS1 results in a 16.1% increase in the maximum scour depth compared to the no-seepage scenario. In comparison, seepage velocity VS2 causes an increase of 25.2% in the maximum scour depth. Due to downward seepage, the flow distribution is shifted down near the channel's boundary. With an increase in the seepage rate, the magnitude of velocity, Reynold shear stress, turbulent kinetic energy, and bed shear stress also rise close to the channel's boundary. The current study also examined bursting events near the channel's bed under seepage and no-seepage conditions. These events included outward interaction, inward interaction, ejection, and sweep. Quadrant analysis of velocimeter data revealed that ejection and sweep were the dominant events contributing to the production of Reynolds shear stress in seepage and no-seepage flows. Meanwhile, outward interactions and inward interactions made minor contributions compared to ejection and sweep events to the Reynolds shear stress.

下渗对 L 型支堤附近水流的影响及河床形态
支堤是沿河岸修建的结构,有两个作用:通过控制河道中的水流来稳定河岸并将侵蚀风险降至最低。本研究利用冲积河道中的 L 形刺堤,分析了刺堤区在河床 z/h < 0.2 附近无渗流和两种不同渗流速度(VS1 = 0.075 mm/s,VS2 = 0.15 mm/s)影响下的河床形态和水流模式。实验研究还考察和比较了渗流条件下局部冲刷深度的变化。研究结果表明,向下的渗流运动导致河床高程发生显著变化,冲刷深度也随之增加。观测结果表明,最大的局部冲刷发生在第一条支堤的前缘。与无渗流情况相比,渗流速度 VS1 导致最大冲刷深度增加了 16.1%。相比之下,渗流速度 VS2 导致最大冲刷深度增加了 25.2%。由于向下渗流,水流分布在河道边界附近向下移动。随着渗流速度的增加,河道边界附近的流速、雷诺剪应力、湍流动能和河床剪应力也随之增加。本次研究还考察了渗流和无渗流条件下河床附近的迸流事件。这些事件包括外向相互作用、内向相互作用、喷射和横扫。对测速仪数据的象限分析表明,在渗流和无渗流中,喷射和横扫是产生雷诺切应力的主要事件。同时,外向相互作用和内向相互作用对雷诺切应力的贡献比喷射和扫描事件小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信