The digital payment-financial inclusion nexus and payment system innovation within the global open economy during the COVID-19 pandemic

Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Ibrahim Niankara , Rachidatou I. Traoret
{"title":"The digital payment-financial inclusion nexus and payment system innovation within the global open economy during the COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"Ibrahim Niankara ,&nbsp;Rachidatou I. Traoret","doi":"10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper retrospectively examines how the digital payment-financial inclusion nexus fostered demand-driven payment system innovation and diffusion within the global open economy during the COVID-19 crisis. To that end, the paper uses a cross-sectional sample of 127854 respondents from across 123 economies, extracted from the 2021 wave of the Global Findex Survey. Together with a hybrid theoretical framework that bridges the quadruple helix (QH) innovation model with random utility theory (RUT), the study characterizes individuals’ stated preferences for cashless payment across the three consumption domains of in-store shopping, online shopping, and regular bills settlement. The parameters of the resulting econometric model are estimated within the R software version 3.6.3. The findings from all nine considered demand side financial inclusion indicators reveal that globally, during the crisis, formal financial inclusion had a significantly positive impact on the marginal utility, and thus likelihood that individuals use digital payment solutions (DPS) for in-store and online shopping experiences, as well as regular bills settlement. Additionally, DPS uptake for online shopping highlighted a significant gender-based gradient in favor of males. Moreover, higher education levels, labor market participation, rising income levels, reduced COVID-19 related financial worries, mobile phone ownership, and internet access, are all found to have positively contributed to individuals’ DPS uptake likelihood during the crisis. Furthermore, a cross-country heterogeneity in individuals’ cashless payment preferences remained persistent across the three consumption domains due to macroeconomic, regulatory, cultural, and digital infrastructural readiness differences between countries. Overall, the findings provide support for evidence-based decision making by all digital payment ecosystem stakeholders.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16678,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity","volume":"9 4","pages":"Article 100173"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2199853123002755/pdfft?md5=08341fdce380e3bfc82422db795b1415&pid=1-s2.0-S2199853123002755-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2199853123002755","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper retrospectively examines how the digital payment-financial inclusion nexus fostered demand-driven payment system innovation and diffusion within the global open economy during the COVID-19 crisis. To that end, the paper uses a cross-sectional sample of 127854 respondents from across 123 economies, extracted from the 2021 wave of the Global Findex Survey. Together with a hybrid theoretical framework that bridges the quadruple helix (QH) innovation model with random utility theory (RUT), the study characterizes individuals’ stated preferences for cashless payment across the three consumption domains of in-store shopping, online shopping, and regular bills settlement. The parameters of the resulting econometric model are estimated within the R software version 3.6.3. The findings from all nine considered demand side financial inclusion indicators reveal that globally, during the crisis, formal financial inclusion had a significantly positive impact on the marginal utility, and thus likelihood that individuals use digital payment solutions (DPS) for in-store and online shopping experiences, as well as regular bills settlement. Additionally, DPS uptake for online shopping highlighted a significant gender-based gradient in favor of males. Moreover, higher education levels, labor market participation, rising income levels, reduced COVID-19 related financial worries, mobile phone ownership, and internet access, are all found to have positively contributed to individuals’ DPS uptake likelihood during the crisis. Furthermore, a cross-country heterogeneity in individuals’ cashless payment preferences remained persistent across the three consumption domains due to macroeconomic, regulatory, cultural, and digital infrastructural readiness differences between countries. Overall, the findings provide support for evidence-based decision making by all digital payment ecosystem stakeholders.

2019冠状病毒病大流行期间全球开放经济中的数字支付与普惠金融关系及支付系统创新
本文回顾分析了在2019冠状病毒病危机期间,数字支付与金融普惠关系如何在全球开放经济中促进需求驱动的支付系统创新和扩散。为此,本文使用了来自123个经济体的127854名受访者的横截面样本,这些样本来自2021年全球金融指数调查的浪潮。结合将四螺旋(QH)创新模型与随机效用理论(RUT)结合起来的混合理论框架,该研究描述了个人在实体店购物、网上购物和定期账单结算这三个消费领域对无现金支付的偏好。得到的计量经济模型的参数在R软件3.6.3版本中进行估计。所有九个需求侧普惠金融指标的研究结果显示,在全球范围内,在危机期间,正式的普惠金融对边际效用产生了显著的积极影响,从而提高了个人使用数字支付解决方案(DPS)进行店内和网上购物体验以及定期账单结算的可能性。此外,DPS在网上购物中的使用也凸显了男性在性别上的显著差异。此外,高等教育水平、劳动力市场参与度、收入水平上升、与COVID-19相关的财务担忧减少、手机拥有率和互联网接入都被发现对危机期间个人接受DPS的可能性有积极影响。此外,由于各国之间宏观经济、监管、文化和数字基础设施准备程度的差异,在三个消费领域中,个人无现金支付偏好的跨国异质性仍然存在。总体而言,研究结果为所有数字支付生态系统利益相关者的循证决策提供了支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity
Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
196
审稿时长
1 day
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书