Underrepresented minorities in business doctoral programs: trends and academic placements (1973 to 2018)

IF 1.5 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Joanna R. Jackson, Willis Lewis, Jr, Nir Menachemi
{"title":"Underrepresented minorities in business doctoral programs: trends and academic placements (1973 to 2018)","authors":"Joanna R. Jackson, Willis Lewis, Jr, Nir Menachemi","doi":"10.1108/jieb-06-2022-0042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose This paper aims to present demographic characteristics and postgraduate employment trends of business doctoral graduates, especially the proportion that are underrepresented minorities (URMs) over time. Design/methodology/approach The authors analyze the near census of individuals receiving doctoral degrees in a wide range of business disciplines from US-accredited universities from 1973 to 2018 ( n = 50,091) contained with the National Science Foundation Survey of Earned Doctorates. The authors analyze how the proportion of URM graduates, by discipline, has changed over time both in terms of receiving a doctoral degree and entering an academic position. Findings The proportion of URM graduates fluctuated between approximately 5% and 15% annually, steadily increasing across decades. Overall, 64.4% of all graduates entered an academic position, with notably higher rates among whites (72.1%) compared to Blacks (51.8%), Hispanics (60.4%) and other URMs (56.4%) ( p < 0.001). In adjusted models, the proportion of URMs that entered academic positions significantly increased overtime, beginning in the 1990s and peaked in the 2000s. Although the few institutions that graduated the highest number of URMs do not currently have an Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business-accredited business school, the authors identify several exemplar institutions where URM graduates entered academic jobs at the highest rates. Originality/value The authors provide demographic trends that shed light on ways to influence an increase in URM doctoral graduates from business disciplines into academic careers. This discussion is of interest to university administrators and other stakeholders interested in diversity issues in higher education.","PeriodicalId":43809,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Education in Business","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Education in Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jieb-06-2022-0042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to present demographic characteristics and postgraduate employment trends of business doctoral graduates, especially the proportion that are underrepresented minorities (URMs) over time. Design/methodology/approach The authors analyze the near census of individuals receiving doctoral degrees in a wide range of business disciplines from US-accredited universities from 1973 to 2018 ( n = 50,091) contained with the National Science Foundation Survey of Earned Doctorates. The authors analyze how the proportion of URM graduates, by discipline, has changed over time both in terms of receiving a doctoral degree and entering an academic position. Findings The proportion of URM graduates fluctuated between approximately 5% and 15% annually, steadily increasing across decades. Overall, 64.4% of all graduates entered an academic position, with notably higher rates among whites (72.1%) compared to Blacks (51.8%), Hispanics (60.4%) and other URMs (56.4%) ( p < 0.001). In adjusted models, the proportion of URMs that entered academic positions significantly increased overtime, beginning in the 1990s and peaked in the 2000s. Although the few institutions that graduated the highest number of URMs do not currently have an Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business-accredited business school, the authors identify several exemplar institutions where URM graduates entered academic jobs at the highest rates. Originality/value The authors provide demographic trends that shed light on ways to influence an increase in URM doctoral graduates from business disciplines into academic careers. This discussion is of interest to university administrators and other stakeholders interested in diversity issues in higher education.
商业博士课程中代表性不足的少数族裔:趋势和学术安置(1973年至2018年)
本文旨在呈现商科博士毕业生的人口特征和研究生就业趋势,特别是代表性不足的少数民族(urm)的比例随时间的变化。作者分析了1973年至2018年在美国认可的大学获得广泛商业学科博士学位的个人近普查(n = 50091),其中包含美国国家科学基金会获得博士学位调查。作者分析了按学科划分的URM毕业生在获得博士学位和进入学术职位方面的比例是如何随时间变化的。URM毕业生的比例在每年大约5%到15%之间波动,几十年来稳步增长。总体而言,64.4%的毕业生进入了学术岗位,白人(72.1%)的比例明显高于黑人(51.8%)、西班牙裔(60.4%)和其他非裔(56.4%)。0.001)。在调整后的模型中,进入学术职位的urm比例从20世纪90年代开始显著增加,并在21世纪初达到顶峰。虽然少数几个URM毕业生最多的机构目前还没有获得美国高等商学院协会(Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of business)认证的商学院,但作者指出了几个URM毕业生以最高比率进入学术界工作的典型机构。原创性/价值作者提供了人口统计趋势,揭示了影响URM博士毕业生从商科学科进入学术生涯的方法。这一讨论对大学管理者和其他对高等教育多样性问题感兴趣的利益相关者很有兴趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of International Education in Business
Journal of International Education in Business EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: The journal of International Education in Business (JIEB) is a peer reviewed journal concerned with theoretical and pedagogic aspects of international education in business schools and its flow-on implications for the workplace. The journal publishes papers that are concerned with: - international education, - cross- and inter-cultural aspects of internationalisation, - internationalisation of business schools, - business school teaching and learning, - academic and social engagement of students, - recruitment and marketing of business education in international contexts, - quality processes with respect to internationalisation, and - global organisations as stakeholders of internationalisation. Theoretical and empirical papers (qualitative and quantitative) as well as case analyses are invited. Papers that explore micro- and macro-perspectives in business and international education are also included.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信