EXPRESS: University Knowledge Inside: How and When University-Industry Collaborations Make New Products More Attractive to Consumers

IF 11.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Lukas Maier, Martin Schreier, Christian V. Baccarella, Kai-Ingo Voigt
{"title":"EXPRESS: University Knowledge Inside: How and When University-Industry Collaborations Make New Products More Attractive to Consumers","authors":"Lukas Maier, Martin Schreier, Christian V. Baccarella, Kai-Ingo Voigt","doi":"10.1177/00222429231185313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this research, the authors examine how consumers perceive the fruits of university–industry collaborations (i.e., new products codeveloped with universities). Eight studies document a positive university effect and highlight its practical significance and boundary conditions. An Instagram A/B test utilizing a video that refers (vs. does not refer) to the underlying university–industry collaboration results in higher click-through rates and ad engagement levels. Another field study demonstrates that university-codeveloped products are more attractive to consumers, even after an actual product trial. Further, several consequential studies reveal that consumers are willing to pay up to 65% more for products marketed as codeveloped with a university. The authors argue and show that collaborating with a university infuses the underlying firm with a stronger sense of scientific legitimacy, thereby making the resulting product more attractive to consumers. Congruously, the authors find that the effect is more pronounced when the scientific legitimacy engendered by universities is more important to the focal product (i.e., high tech vs. low tech), underlying company (i.e., new vs. established), or target customer (i.e., high vs. low belief in science).","PeriodicalId":16152,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Marketing","volume":"85 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":11.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00222429231185313","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this research, the authors examine how consumers perceive the fruits of university–industry collaborations (i.e., new products codeveloped with universities). Eight studies document a positive university effect and highlight its practical significance and boundary conditions. An Instagram A/B test utilizing a video that refers (vs. does not refer) to the underlying university–industry collaboration results in higher click-through rates and ad engagement levels. Another field study demonstrates that university-codeveloped products are more attractive to consumers, even after an actual product trial. Further, several consequential studies reveal that consumers are willing to pay up to 65% more for products marketed as codeveloped with a university. The authors argue and show that collaborating with a university infuses the underlying firm with a stronger sense of scientific legitimacy, thereby making the resulting product more attractive to consumers. Congruously, the authors find that the effect is more pronounced when the scientific legitimacy engendered by universities is more important to the focal product (i.e., high tech vs. low tech), underlying company (i.e., new vs. established), or target customer (i.e., high vs. low belief in science).
EXPRESS:大学内部知识:大学-产业合作如何以及何时使新产品对消费者更具吸引力
在这项研究中,作者考察了消费者如何看待校企合作的成果(即与大学共同开发的新产品)。八项研究证明了积极的大学效应,并强调了其现实意义和边界条件。一个Instagram的A/B测试,利用一个视频,参考(vs.不参考)潜在的大学-产业合作,可以产生更高的点击率和广告参与度。另一项实地研究表明,大学合作开发的产品对消费者更有吸引力,即使是在实际的产品试用之后。此外,几项重要的研究表明,消费者愿意为与大学合作开发的产品多支付65%的费用。作者论证并表明,与大学合作给潜在的公司注入了更强的科学合法性,从而使最终产品对消费者更具吸引力。与此同时,作者发现,当大学产生的科学合法性对重点产品(即高科技vs低科技)、基础公司(即新公司vs老牌公司)或目标客户(即高科学信念vs低科学信念)更重要时,这种影响更为明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
24.10
自引率
5.40%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: Founded in 1936,the Journal of Marketing (JM) serves as a premier outlet for substantive research in marketing. JM is dedicated to developing and disseminating knowledge about real-world marketing questions, catering to scholars, educators, managers, policy makers, consumers, and other global societal stakeholders. Over the years,JM has played a crucial role in shaping the content and boundaries of the marketing discipline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信