Scientific views of R.O. Jacobson in the paradigm of text-linguistics

Lin Ye, Yitong Liu
{"title":"Scientific views of R.O. Jacobson in the paradigm of text-linguistics","authors":"Lin Ye, Yitong Liu","doi":"10.20310/2587-6953-2023-9-4-1017-1025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The semiotic concept of R.O. Jacobson has been studied, the ideas of which are associated with structuralism as a method of cognition, semiotics as the science of sign systems and poetics as the general semiotics of the text. We analyzed the main components of the R.O. Jacobson concept, which based on the linguocultural aspect of textual criticism. His complex and dialogical view of semiotics and the unique features of his research paradigm are summarized. When considering the category “complexity”, attention is drawn to the modeling of the “meaning – text” model in the aspect of bringing the science of language closer to the sciences of the anthropocentric cycle. Consideration of the similarity and contiguity of metaphor and metonymy allowed R.O. Jacobson should consider that any metonymy is endowed with a slight metaphorical shadow, and any metaphor has a metonymic coloring, and highlight a formal method of research, which represents the merging and transformation of two different processes of thinking – humanistic and scientific. The scientist considered linguistic consciousness to be in some way derivative of ethnocultural consciousness. since it clearly reflects the ideas of Eastern and Western people about the world within a separate national-cultural tradition, building its own scientific view, defining the features of the organization of discourse. The category of “dialogicity,” which manifests itself in the process of an individual’s speech-mental activity, realizes the dialectical unity of language and thinking, and therefore, bearing in mind the thought processes occurring in the human mind, it is more correct to speak of dialogicity as a text-generating speech-thinking process.","PeriodicalId":34441,"journal":{"name":"Neofilologiia","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neofilologiia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20310/2587-6953-2023-9-4-1017-1025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The semiotic concept of R.O. Jacobson has been studied, the ideas of which are associated with structuralism as a method of cognition, semiotics as the science of sign systems and poetics as the general semiotics of the text. We analyzed the main components of the R.O. Jacobson concept, which based on the linguocultural aspect of textual criticism. His complex and dialogical view of semiotics and the unique features of his research paradigm are summarized. When considering the category “complexity”, attention is drawn to the modeling of the “meaning – text” model in the aspect of bringing the science of language closer to the sciences of the anthropocentric cycle. Consideration of the similarity and contiguity of metaphor and metonymy allowed R.O. Jacobson should consider that any metonymy is endowed with a slight metaphorical shadow, and any metaphor has a metonymic coloring, and highlight a formal method of research, which represents the merging and transformation of two different processes of thinking – humanistic and scientific. The scientist considered linguistic consciousness to be in some way derivative of ethnocultural consciousness. since it clearly reflects the ideas of Eastern and Western people about the world within a separate national-cultural tradition, building its own scientific view, defining the features of the organization of discourse. The category of “dialogicity,” which manifests itself in the process of an individual’s speech-mental activity, realizes the dialectical unity of language and thinking, and therefore, bearing in mind the thought processes occurring in the human mind, it is more correct to speak of dialogicity as a text-generating speech-thinking process.
文本语言学范式下R.O.雅各布森的科学观
本文研究了R.O.雅各布森的符号学概念,将其思想与作为认知方法的结构主义、作为符号系统科学的符号学和作为文本一般符号学的诗学联系起来。本文从语篇批评的语言文化角度分析了雅各布森语篇观的主要组成部分。总结了其复杂的符号学对话观及其独特的研究范式。在考虑“复杂性”这一范畴时,在使语言科学更接近人类中心循环科学方面,“意义-文本”模型的建模引起了人们的注意。考虑到隐喻和转喻的相似性和邻近性,R.O.雅各布森应该考虑到任何转喻都被赋予了轻微的隐喻阴影,任何隐喻都有转喻的色彩,并突出一种形式的研究方法,它代表了人文和科学两种不同思维过程的融合和转化。这位科学家认为语言意识在某种程度上是民族文化意识的衍生物。因为它清楚地反映了东西方人民在不同的民族文化传统中对世界的看法,建立了自己的科学观点,定义了话语组织的特征。“对话”这一范畴体现在个体的言语-心理活动过程中,实现了语言与思维的辩证统一,因此,结合人的思维过程,将对话称为生成文本的言语-思维过程更为正确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信