Renal tumours of childhood: what's new in classification, morphology, molecular findings and prognosis

Gordan M Vujanić, Laura Galluzzo Mutti, Sergey D Popov
{"title":"Renal tumours of childhood: what's new in classification, morphology, molecular findings and prognosis","authors":"Gordan M Vujanić,&nbsp;Laura Galluzzo Mutti,&nbsp;Sergey D Popov","doi":"10.1016/j.mpdhp.2023.09.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span><span>Despite being one of the most frequent solid tumours in children, </span>renal tumours<span><span><span> are uncommon. Their accurate diagnosis and staging are essential for the appropriate treatment because they comprise a variety of entities with a broad spectrum of clinical, histological, molecular biology, and prognostic features. </span>Wilms tumour (WT) accounts for 80–85% of renal tumours of childhood, whereas other tumours including </span>mesoblastic nephroma, </span></span>clear cell sarcoma, </span>rhabdoid tumour<span><span><span>, renal cell carcinoma, and others are extremely uncommon (up to 2%–4% each), which explains why they pose a significant diagnostic challenge for </span>pathologists<span>. There are two major study groups with different treatment approaches but very comparable outcomes. The International Society of Paediatric Oncology<span> approach (followed in most of the world) is based on preoperative chemotherapy, followed by surgery and further therapy, whereas the Children's Oncology Group approach (followed mainly in the United States and Canada) is based on primary surgery, followed by postoperative treatment. In both study groups for WT the most important </span></span></span>prognostic factors<span> are histological type and stage. The criteria for subtyping and staging are similar but still differ between the study groups, making a direct comparison impossible, but nevertheless, the outcomes are remarkably similar. The chapter provides an update on pathology, recent molecular discoveries and prognosis in paediatric renal tumours.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":39961,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic Histopathology","volume":"29 12","pages":"Pages 544-553"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic Histopathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1756231723001470","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite being one of the most frequent solid tumours in children, renal tumours are uncommon. Their accurate diagnosis and staging are essential for the appropriate treatment because they comprise a variety of entities with a broad spectrum of clinical, histological, molecular biology, and prognostic features. Wilms tumour (WT) accounts for 80–85% of renal tumours of childhood, whereas other tumours including mesoblastic nephroma, clear cell sarcoma, rhabdoid tumour, renal cell carcinoma, and others are extremely uncommon (up to 2%–4% each), which explains why they pose a significant diagnostic challenge for pathologists. There are two major study groups with different treatment approaches but very comparable outcomes. The International Society of Paediatric Oncology approach (followed in most of the world) is based on preoperative chemotherapy, followed by surgery and further therapy, whereas the Children's Oncology Group approach (followed mainly in the United States and Canada) is based on primary surgery, followed by postoperative treatment. In both study groups for WT the most important prognostic factors are histological type and stage. The criteria for subtyping and staging are similar but still differ between the study groups, making a direct comparison impossible, but nevertheless, the outcomes are remarkably similar. The chapter provides an update on pathology, recent molecular discoveries and prognosis in paediatric renal tumours.

儿童肾肿瘤:分类、形态学、分子特征和预后的新进展
尽管肾肿瘤是儿童中最常见的实体肿瘤之一,但它并不常见。准确的诊断和分期对于适当的治疗至关重要,因为它们包括各种各样的实体,具有广泛的临床、组织学、分子生物学和预后特征。肾母细胞瘤(WT)占儿童肾肿瘤的80-85%,而其他肿瘤包括间母细胞肾瘤、透明细胞肉瘤、横纹肌瘤、肾细胞癌等极为罕见(每种高达2%-4%),这解释了为什么它们对病理学家构成了重大的诊断挑战。有两个主要的研究小组采用不同的治疗方法,但结果非常相似。国际儿科肿瘤学会的方法(在世界大部分地区采用)是基于术前化疗,然后是手术和进一步治疗,而儿童肿瘤学会的方法(主要在美国和加拿大采用)是基于初步手术,然后是术后治疗。在两个研究组中,WT最重要的预后因素是组织学类型和分期。亚型和分期的标准相似,但在研究组之间仍然存在差异,因此不可能进行直接比较,但尽管如此,结果非常相似。本章提供了一个更新的病理,最近的分子发现和预后在儿科肾肿瘤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diagnostic Histopathology
Diagnostic Histopathology Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: This monthly review journal aims to provide the practising diagnostic pathologist and trainee pathologist with up-to-date reviews on histopathology and cytology and related technical advances. Each issue contains invited articles on a variety of topics from experts in the field and includes a mini-symposium exploring one subject in greater depth. Articles consist of system-based, disease-based reviews and advances in technology. They update the readers on day-to-day diagnostic work and keep them informed of important new developments. An additional feature is the short section devoted to hypotheses; these have been refereed. There is also a correspondence section.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信