Adversarial Attacks Assessment of Salient Object Detection via Symbolic Learning

IF 5.1 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Gustavo Olague;Roberto Pineda;Gerardo Ibarra-Vazquez;Matthieu Olague;Axel Martinez;Sambit Bakshi;Jonathan Vargas;Isnardo Reducindo
{"title":"Adversarial Attacks Assessment of Salient Object Detection via Symbolic Learning","authors":"Gustavo Olague;Roberto Pineda;Gerardo Ibarra-Vazquez;Matthieu Olague;Axel Martinez;Sambit Bakshi;Jonathan Vargas;Isnardo Reducindo","doi":"10.1109/TETC.2023.3316549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Machine learning is at the center of mainstream technology and outperforms classical approaches to handcrafted feature design. Aside from its learning process for artificial feature extraction, it has an end-to-end paradigm from input to output, reaching outstandingly accurate results. However, security concerns about its robustness to malicious and imperceptible perturbations have drawn attention since its prediction can be changed entirely. Salient object detection is a research area where deep convolutional neural networks have proven effective but whose trustworthiness represents a significant issue requiring analysis and solutions to hackers’ attacks. Brain programming is a kind of symbolic learning in the vein of good old-fashioned artificial intelligence. This work provides evidence that symbolic learning robustness is crucial in designing reliable visual attention systems since it can withstand even the most intense perturbations. We test this evolutionary computation methodology against several adversarial attacks and noise perturbations using standard databases and a real-world problem of a shorebird called the Snowy Plover portraying a visual attention task. We compare our methodology with five different deep learning approaches, proving that they do not match the symbolic paradigm regarding robustness. All neural networks suffer significant performance losses, while brain programming stands its ground and remains unaffected. Also, by studying the Snowy Plover, we remark on the importance of security in surveillance activities regarding wildlife protection and conservation.","PeriodicalId":13156,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10261449/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Machine learning is at the center of mainstream technology and outperforms classical approaches to handcrafted feature design. Aside from its learning process for artificial feature extraction, it has an end-to-end paradigm from input to output, reaching outstandingly accurate results. However, security concerns about its robustness to malicious and imperceptible perturbations have drawn attention since its prediction can be changed entirely. Salient object detection is a research area where deep convolutional neural networks have proven effective but whose trustworthiness represents a significant issue requiring analysis and solutions to hackers’ attacks. Brain programming is a kind of symbolic learning in the vein of good old-fashioned artificial intelligence. This work provides evidence that symbolic learning robustness is crucial in designing reliable visual attention systems since it can withstand even the most intense perturbations. We test this evolutionary computation methodology against several adversarial attacks and noise perturbations using standard databases and a real-world problem of a shorebird called the Snowy Plover portraying a visual attention task. We compare our methodology with five different deep learning approaches, proving that they do not match the symbolic paradigm regarding robustness. All neural networks suffer significant performance losses, while brain programming stands its ground and remains unaffected. Also, by studying the Snowy Plover, we remark on the importance of security in surveillance activities regarding wildlife protection and conservation.
通过符号学习评估突出物体检测的对抗性攻击
机器学习是主流技术的核心,它优于传统的手工特征设计方法。除了人工特征提取的学习过程外,机器学习还具有从输入到输出的端到端范式,可获得出色的精确结果。然而,由于它的预测可以完全改变,因此它对恶意和不易察觉的扰动的鲁棒性引起了安全方面的关注。突出物体检测是深度卷积神经网络已被证明有效的一个研究领域,但其可信度是一个重大问题,需要分析和解决黑客攻击。大脑编程是一种与传统人工智能一脉相承的符号学习。这项研究证明,符号学习的鲁棒性对设计可靠的视觉注意力系统至关重要,因为它甚至可以承受最强烈的干扰。我们使用标准数据库和现实世界中描绘视觉注意力任务的雪鸻岸鸟问题,测试了这种进化计算方法是否能抵御几种对抗性攻击和噪声扰动。我们将我们的方法与五种不同的深度学习方法进行了比较,证明它们在鲁棒性方面与符号范式并不匹配。所有神经网络的性能都有明显下降,而大脑编程却能站稳脚跟,不受影响。此外,通过研究雪鸻,我们还指出了野生动物保护和保育监控活动中安全的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing
IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing Computer Science-Computer Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
5.10%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing publishes papers on emerging aspects of computer science, computing technology, and computing applications not currently covered by other IEEE Computer Society Transactions. Some examples of emerging topics in computing include: IT for Green, Synthetic and organic computing structures and systems, Advanced analytics, Social/occupational computing, Location-based/client computer systems, Morphic computer design, Electronic game systems, & Health-care IT.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信