{"title":"Optimizing Data Collection Interventions to Balance Cost and Quality in a Sequential Multimode Survey","authors":"Stephanie M Coffey, Michael R Elliott","doi":"10.1093/jssam/smad007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract High-quality survey data collection is getting more expensive to conduct because of decreasing response rates and rising data collection costs. Responsive and adaptive designs have emerged as a framework for targeting and reallocating resources during the data collection period to improve survey data collection efficiency. Here, we report on the implementation and evaluation of a responsive design experiment in the National Survey of College Graduates that optimizes the cost-quality tradeoff by minimizing a function of data collection costs and the root mean squared error of a key survey measure, self-reported salary. We used a Bayesian framework to incorporate prior information and generate predictions of estimated response propensity, self-reported salary, and data collection costs for use in our optimization rule. At three points during the data collection process, we implement the optimization rule and identify cases for which reduced effort would have minimal effect on the mean squared error (RMSE) of mean self-reported salary while allowing us to reduce data collection costs. We find that this optimization process allowed us to reduce data collection costs by nearly 10 percent, without a statistically or practically significant increase in the RMSE of mean salary or a decrease in the unweighted response rate. This experiment demonstrates the potential for these types of designs to more effectively target data collection resources to reach survey quality goals.","PeriodicalId":17146,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smad007","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, MATHEMATICAL METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Abstract High-quality survey data collection is getting more expensive to conduct because of decreasing response rates and rising data collection costs. Responsive and adaptive designs have emerged as a framework for targeting and reallocating resources during the data collection period to improve survey data collection efficiency. Here, we report on the implementation and evaluation of a responsive design experiment in the National Survey of College Graduates that optimizes the cost-quality tradeoff by minimizing a function of data collection costs and the root mean squared error of a key survey measure, self-reported salary. We used a Bayesian framework to incorporate prior information and generate predictions of estimated response propensity, self-reported salary, and data collection costs for use in our optimization rule. At three points during the data collection process, we implement the optimization rule and identify cases for which reduced effort would have minimal effect on the mean squared error (RMSE) of mean self-reported salary while allowing us to reduce data collection costs. We find that this optimization process allowed us to reduce data collection costs by nearly 10 percent, without a statistically or practically significant increase in the RMSE of mean salary or a decrease in the unweighted response rate. This experiment demonstrates the potential for these types of designs to more effectively target data collection resources to reach survey quality goals.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, sponsored by AAPOR and the American Statistical Association, began publishing in 2013. Its objective is to publish cutting edge scholarly articles on statistical and methodological issues for sample surveys, censuses, administrative record systems, and other related data. It aims to be the flagship journal for research on survey statistics and methodology. Topics of interest include survey sample design, statistical inference, nonresponse, measurement error, the effects of modes of data collection, paradata and responsive survey design, combining data from multiple sources, record linkage, disclosure limitation, and other issues in survey statistics and methodology. The journal publishes both theoretical and applied papers, provided the theory is motivated by an important applied problem and the applied papers report on research that contributes generalizable knowledge to the field. Review papers are also welcomed. Papers on a broad range of surveys are encouraged, including (but not limited to) surveys concerning business, economics, marketing research, social science, environment, epidemiology, biostatistics and official statistics. The journal has three sections. The Survey Statistics section presents papers on innovative sampling procedures, imputation, weighting, measures of uncertainty, small area inference, new methods of analysis, and other statistical issues related to surveys. The Survey Methodology section presents papers that focus on methodological research, including methodological experiments, methods of data collection and use of paradata. The Applications section contains papers involving innovative applications of methods and providing practical contributions and guidance, and/or significant new findings.