From recipe to enquiry – a curriculum tool for science teachers to align policy with practice in practical lessons

IF 1.8 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Natalie O’Neill
{"title":"From recipe to enquiry – a curriculum tool for science teachers to align policy with practice in practical lessons","authors":"Natalie O’Neill","doi":"10.1080/03323315.2023.2261001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Internationally, second level curriculum policy for STEM education is concentrating its efforts on promoting curriculum-making pedagogies, with enquiry-based teaching and learning at the forefront of this change. Policy aspirations have not translated well into practice, evidenced by science practical lessons consistently being delivered as recipes to be followed. In recognition of this, national STEM policies are calling for quality pedagogical resources that can support teachers to engage in teaching practical work through scientific enquiry. This article describes how Design Based Research was used as a methodology to create and evaluate a resource, the Structured Enquiry Observation Schedule (SEOS), as a tool to identify student achievement of procedural (enquiry and laboratory) skills in practical biology lessons. Data collected using the SEOS, was triangulated with interview, video and audio data over three iterative research cycles. Findings indicated that the SEOS provides a lens to compare and align policy intentions with classroom enactment of practical work by identifying the basic procedural skills that should underpin any enquiry-based practical lesson, and by highlighting the importance of student attainment of those skills. If used by practising teachers, it has potential to answer calls for quality resources to support the transition to enquiry-based science pedagogy.","PeriodicalId":46076,"journal":{"name":"Irish Educational Studies","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Educational Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2023.2261001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Internationally, second level curriculum policy for STEM education is concentrating its efforts on promoting curriculum-making pedagogies, with enquiry-based teaching and learning at the forefront of this change. Policy aspirations have not translated well into practice, evidenced by science practical lessons consistently being delivered as recipes to be followed. In recognition of this, national STEM policies are calling for quality pedagogical resources that can support teachers to engage in teaching practical work through scientific enquiry. This article describes how Design Based Research was used as a methodology to create and evaluate a resource, the Structured Enquiry Observation Schedule (SEOS), as a tool to identify student achievement of procedural (enquiry and laboratory) skills in practical biology lessons. Data collected using the SEOS, was triangulated with interview, video and audio data over three iterative research cycles. Findings indicated that the SEOS provides a lens to compare and align policy intentions with classroom enactment of practical work by identifying the basic procedural skills that should underpin any enquiry-based practical lesson, and by highlighting the importance of student attainment of those skills. If used by practising teachers, it has potential to answer calls for quality resources to support the transition to enquiry-based science pedagogy.
从配方到探究——科学教师在实践课中使政策与实践相结合的课程工具
在国际上,STEM教育的二级课程政策正致力于促进课程制定教学法,以探究为基础的教学和学习处于这一变革的最前沿。政策期望并没有很好地转化为实践,科学实践经验一直被当作可遵循的食谱来传授就是明证。认识到这一点,国家STEM政策呼吁提供高质量的教学资源,支持教师通过科学探究从事实际教学工作。本文描述了如何将基于设计的研究作为一种方法来创建和评估一种资源,即结构化查询观察时间表(seo),作为一种工具来确定学生在实际生物学课程中程序(查询和实验室)技能的成就。使用搜索引擎优化系统收集的数据,通过三个迭代研究周期与访谈、视频和音频数据进行三角测量。调查结果显示,“搜索引擎优化策略”提供了一个视角,通过确定任何以探究为基础的实践课程应具备的基本程序技能,并强调学生掌握这些技能的重要性,将政策意图与课堂实际工作进行比较和协调。如果由实践教师使用,它有可能回应对高质量资源的呼吁,以支持向基于探究的科学教学法的过渡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Irish Educational Studies
Irish Educational Studies EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
23.50%
发文量
78
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信