{"title":"Exploring growth mindset experiences in university students","authors":"Anita L. Campbell","doi":"10.1080/0020739x.2023.2255212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractStudents that classify as having growth mindsets rather than fixed mindsets enjoy greater academic success. This finding has been repeated in a variety of contexts and encourages teachers and researchers to develop growth mindsets in students. However, neutral and negative conclusions from some mindset intervention studies raise questions about the conditions in which growth mindsets develop. This study contributes evidence and suggestions to guide the development and assessment of growth mindsets in university students. The five-stage behaviour change model provides a framework to explain why mindset interventions may cause shifts that are not detected in the short term. Mindset assessment methods with original and adapted scales are presented and critiqued. I compare literature-sourced experiences used in growth mindset interventions with interview data from seven first-year engineering students at a South African university to help determine if growth mindset interventions for university students are worth implementing. I summarise implications for practice when assessing mindsets or using growth mindset interventions.KEYWORDS: Academic achievementuniversity studentsfixed mindsetimplicit theories of intelligencestudent successinterventionbehaviour change AcknowledgementsI am grateful to helpful suggestions from my PhD supervisors Tracy Craig and Brandon Collier-Reed, anonymous reviewers, and members of Helen Sword's WriteSPACE. Special thanks to the students who generously volunteered their time for interviews. This work is adapted from a chapter in my PhD (Campbell, Citation2020).Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by National Research Foundation [grant number TTK160531166788]; University of Cape Town.","PeriodicalId":14026,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739x.2023.2255212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
AbstractStudents that classify as having growth mindsets rather than fixed mindsets enjoy greater academic success. This finding has been repeated in a variety of contexts and encourages teachers and researchers to develop growth mindsets in students. However, neutral and negative conclusions from some mindset intervention studies raise questions about the conditions in which growth mindsets develop. This study contributes evidence and suggestions to guide the development and assessment of growth mindsets in university students. The five-stage behaviour change model provides a framework to explain why mindset interventions may cause shifts that are not detected in the short term. Mindset assessment methods with original and adapted scales are presented and critiqued. I compare literature-sourced experiences used in growth mindset interventions with interview data from seven first-year engineering students at a South African university to help determine if growth mindset interventions for university students are worth implementing. I summarise implications for practice when assessing mindsets or using growth mindset interventions.KEYWORDS: Academic achievementuniversity studentsfixed mindsetimplicit theories of intelligencestudent successinterventionbehaviour change AcknowledgementsI am grateful to helpful suggestions from my PhD supervisors Tracy Craig and Brandon Collier-Reed, anonymous reviewers, and members of Helen Sword's WriteSPACE. Special thanks to the students who generously volunteered their time for interviews. This work is adapted from a chapter in my PhD (Campbell, Citation2020).Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by National Research Foundation [grant number TTK160531166788]; University of Cape Town.
期刊介绍:
Mathematics is pervading every study and technique in our modern world, bringing ever more sharply into focus the responsibilities laid upon those whose task it is to teach it. Most prominent among these is the difficulty of presenting an interdisciplinary approach so that one professional group may benefit from the experience of others. The International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology provides a medium by which a wide range of experience in mathematical education can be presented, assimilated and eventually adapted to everyday needs in schools, colleges, polytechnics, universities, industry and commerce. Contributions will be welcomed from lecturers, teachers and users of mathematics at all levels on the contents of syllabuses and methods of presentation.