Undergraduate perceptions of graduate teaching assistants: competence, relatedness, and autonomy in practice

Jendayi B. Dillard, Katherine Sadek, Katherine Muenks
{"title":"Undergraduate perceptions of graduate teaching assistants: competence, relatedness, and autonomy in practice","authors":"Jendayi B. Dillard, Katherine Sadek, Katherine Muenks","doi":"10.1080/07294360.2023.2215169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTGraduate teaching assistants (GTAs) play a significant role in higher education and in the education of undergraduate students. Previous research suggests that undergraduate students perceive GTAs differently than faculty instructors, but little has been done to explore the nature of those perceptions. This exploratory study uses self-determination theory to investigate how university students describe the effective teaching practices of GTAs and how those descriptions vary depending on GTA gender, GTA international status, and course domain. Findings suggest that the majority of undergraduates described GTAs’ competence-supporting practices and that descriptions varied based on GTAs’ international status and on course domain. Implications for GTA training are discussed. Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 ‘Lab section’ or ‘discussion section’ is the US term for a supplemental or tutorial class taught in conjunction with a college or university course. In this study, GTAs were responsible for independently implementing their ‘lab or discussion section’, but received supervision from university faculty.","PeriodicalId":73238,"journal":{"name":"Higher education research and development","volume":"316 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Higher education research and development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2023.2215169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTGraduate teaching assistants (GTAs) play a significant role in higher education and in the education of undergraduate students. Previous research suggests that undergraduate students perceive GTAs differently than faculty instructors, but little has been done to explore the nature of those perceptions. This exploratory study uses self-determination theory to investigate how university students describe the effective teaching practices of GTAs and how those descriptions vary depending on GTA gender, GTA international status, and course domain. Findings suggest that the majority of undergraduates described GTAs’ competence-supporting practices and that descriptions varied based on GTAs’ international status and on course domain. Implications for GTA training are discussed. Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 ‘Lab section’ or ‘discussion section’ is the US term for a supplemental or tutorial class taught in conjunction with a college or university course. In this study, GTAs were responsible for independently implementing their ‘lab or discussion section’, but received supervision from university faculty.
本科生对研究生助教的看法:能力、关系和实践中的自主性
摘要研究生助教在高等教育和本科生教育中发挥着重要作用。先前的研究表明,本科生对gta的看法与教师不同,但很少有人去探索这些看法的本质。本研究运用自我决定理论探讨大学生如何描述GTA的有效教学实践,以及这些描述如何随GTA性别、GTA国际地位和课程领域的不同而变化。研究结果表明,大多数本科生描述了gta的能力支持实践,并且描述因gta的国际地位和课程领域而异。对GTA训练的启示进行了讨论。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。注1“实验部分”或“讨论部分”是美国术语,指与学院或大学课程相结合的补充或辅导课。在这项研究中,gta负责独立实施他们的“实验或讨论部分”,但接受大学教师的监督。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信