Factors Contributing to Extreme Polarization in Society: A case Study of Florida State, USA

{"title":"Factors Contributing to Extreme Polarization in Society: A case Study of Florida State, USA","authors":"","doi":"10.53819/81018102t5273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Florida's society is deeply entrenched in extreme polarization, with sharp divides along political, social, and cultural lines. This polarization is reflected in heated debates over issues such as gun control, immigration, and climate change, leading to a lack of constructive dialogue and an erosion of empathy and understanding. The intense polarization has created a fragmented society, hindering progress and unity, and highlighting the urgent need for bridge-building and fostering a sense of common purpose. Studies have shown that during election cycles, voters become more polarized and adopt more extreme positions as political campaigns focus on divisive issues and employ aggressive tactics. The high-stakes nature of Florida's political environment further deepens polarization among voters. Studies have found that individuals residing in urban and rural regions often hold contrasting views on issues such as gun control, immigration, and environmental policies, contributing to the polarization of society. The study concluded that addressing extreme polarization in Florida's society requires a multi-faceted approach. These can be achieved by encouraging open and respectful dialogue, promoting media literacy, and fostering platforms for diverse perspectives which will help in counteracting the echo-chamber effect and promote understanding. Bridging the urban-rural divide through initiatives that address common challenges and promote mutual cooperation can also foster unity and reduce polarization. Promoting civic engagement, supporting inclusive policies, and addressing socioeconomic disparities can help alleviate the divisions contributing to extreme polarization. The study recommended that by encouraging spaces for civil discourse and promoting platforms that facilitate conversations between individuals with different viewpoints can help bridge ideological gaps. Encouraging individuals to participate in community activities, volunteer work, and political processes can help create a sense of shared responsibility and common purpose. Keywords: Extreme Polarization, Factors, Society, USA","PeriodicalId":379362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sociology, Psychology & Religious Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sociology, Psychology & Religious Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53819/81018102t5273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Florida's society is deeply entrenched in extreme polarization, with sharp divides along political, social, and cultural lines. This polarization is reflected in heated debates over issues such as gun control, immigration, and climate change, leading to a lack of constructive dialogue and an erosion of empathy and understanding. The intense polarization has created a fragmented society, hindering progress and unity, and highlighting the urgent need for bridge-building and fostering a sense of common purpose. Studies have shown that during election cycles, voters become more polarized and adopt more extreme positions as political campaigns focus on divisive issues and employ aggressive tactics. The high-stakes nature of Florida's political environment further deepens polarization among voters. Studies have found that individuals residing in urban and rural regions often hold contrasting views on issues such as gun control, immigration, and environmental policies, contributing to the polarization of society. The study concluded that addressing extreme polarization in Florida's society requires a multi-faceted approach. These can be achieved by encouraging open and respectful dialogue, promoting media literacy, and fostering platforms for diverse perspectives which will help in counteracting the echo-chamber effect and promote understanding. Bridging the urban-rural divide through initiatives that address common challenges and promote mutual cooperation can also foster unity and reduce polarization. Promoting civic engagement, supporting inclusive policies, and addressing socioeconomic disparities can help alleviate the divisions contributing to extreme polarization. The study recommended that by encouraging spaces for civil discourse and promoting platforms that facilitate conversations between individuals with different viewpoints can help bridge ideological gaps. Encouraging individuals to participate in community activities, volunteer work, and political processes can help create a sense of shared responsibility and common purpose. Keywords: Extreme Polarization, Factors, Society, USA
社会两极分化的成因:以美国佛罗里达州为例
佛罗里达州的社会在极端的两极分化中根深蒂固,在政治、社会和文化方面存在着尖锐的分歧。这种两极分化反映在枪支管制、移民和气候变化等问题上的激烈辩论中,导致缺乏建设性的对话,并侵蚀了同理心和理解。严重的两极分化造成了一个分裂的社会,阻碍了进步和团结,并突出了迫切需要建立桥梁和培养共同目标感。研究表明,在选举周期中,选民变得更加两极化,采取更加极端的立场,因为政治竞选关注分裂问题并采用激进的策略。佛罗里达州政治环境的高风险性质进一步加深了选民之间的两极分化。研究发现,居住在城市和农村地区的个人在枪支管制、移民和环境政策等问题上往往持有截然不同的观点,这导致了社会的两极分化。该研究的结论是,解决佛罗里达州社会的极端两极分化需要多方面的方法。这些目标可以通过鼓励公开和尊重的对话、促进媒体素养以及为有助于抵消回音室效应和促进理解的不同观点建立平台来实现。通过应对共同挑战和促进相互合作的举措弥合城乡差距,也可以促进团结,减少两极分化。促进公民参与,支持包容性政策,解决社会经济差距问题,有助于缓解导致极端两极分化的分歧。该研究建议,通过鼓励民间话语空间和促进不同观点个人之间对话的平台,可以帮助弥合意识形态鸿沟。鼓励个人参与社区活动、志愿工作和政治进程可以帮助创造一种共同的责任感和共同的目标。关键词:极端极化,因素,社会,美国
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信