A Comparative Efficacy of Antidepressants in the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Sarah Naher
{"title":"A Comparative Efficacy of Antidepressants in the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Sarah Naher","doi":"10.53819/81018102t4218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) affects about 280, 000, 000 people globally, with a higher incidence among females than males. The increasing incidence implicates health burdens and clinical dilemmas regarding the low efficacy of the existing antidepressants. A literature search was performed on electronic databases, PubMed, the Cochrane Library of Randomized Trials, Scopus, and ProQuest, for studies reporting the efficacy of an SNRI (Desvenlafaxine 50 mg/d), a serotonin modulator (Vortioxetine 10-20 mg/d), and an aminoketone antidepressant (Bupropion). Study selection focused on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies. All statistical analyses and visualization were performed using the Review Manager (RevMan) software and Python programming. The random effects model, ANOVA test, and Cohen’s d were used for statistical analyses. The present meta-analysis involved 17 studies, including 11, 533 participants. The results aligned with previous studies and accounts provided by literature regarding the efficacy of antidepressants used to manage MDD. Five studies, including 2, 377 MDD patients, reported a statistically significant outcome, that Desvenlafaxine 50 mg/d reduced MDD’s severity than placebo (OR: 0.52, 95% CI [0.44, 0.62], P < 0.00001, I2 = 0%). Three studies involving 742 MDD patients reported the efficacy of dextromethorphan-bupropion (AXS-50). The reduction of MADRS scores in the treatment group was statistically insignificant, with high variability, favouring the placebo (OR of 1.85 [95% CI: 0.93, 3.70], p = 0.08, I2 = 79%). Additionally, Vortioxetine 10-20 mg/d produced adverse effects, headache, vomiting, nausea, diarrhea, dizziness, nasopharyngitis, somnolence, and suicidal ideation among 6, 669 MDD patients reported by the 9 studies. The finding was statistically significant but with a high variability OR: 15.25, 95% CI [12.55, 18.52], P < 0.00001, I2 = 98%). A preliminary analysis of evidence collected following Desvenlafaxine, AXS-50, and Vortioxetine administration yielded compelling evidence on the efficacy of antidepressants in MDD treatment. Desvenlafaxine and AXS-50 reported reduced severity and symptomatology in MDD, respectively. On the other hand, Vortioxetine implicated adverse effects, which are common with most antidepressants. Despite adverse effects like headache, vomiting, nausea, diarrhea, dizziness, nasopharyngitis, somnolence, and suicidal ideation, antidepressants used to treat MDD yield clinically satisfying outcomes like decreased severity of depression and relief from symptoms. Clinicians should monitor patients to take care of any adverse effects resulting from the treatments. Keywords: Antidepressant efficacy, adverse effects, major depressive disorder, MDD symptomatology, severity, improved outcomes.","PeriodicalId":379362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sociology, Psychology & Religious Studies","volume":"2015 17","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sociology, Psychology & Religious Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53819/81018102t4218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) affects about 280, 000, 000 people globally, with a higher incidence among females than males. The increasing incidence implicates health burdens and clinical dilemmas regarding the low efficacy of the existing antidepressants. A literature search was performed on electronic databases, PubMed, the Cochrane Library of Randomized Trials, Scopus, and ProQuest, for studies reporting the efficacy of an SNRI (Desvenlafaxine 50 mg/d), a serotonin modulator (Vortioxetine 10-20 mg/d), and an aminoketone antidepressant (Bupropion). Study selection focused on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies. All statistical analyses and visualization were performed using the Review Manager (RevMan) software and Python programming. The random effects model, ANOVA test, and Cohen’s d were used for statistical analyses. The present meta-analysis involved 17 studies, including 11, 533 participants. The results aligned with previous studies and accounts provided by literature regarding the efficacy of antidepressants used to manage MDD. Five studies, including 2, 377 MDD patients, reported a statistically significant outcome, that Desvenlafaxine 50 mg/d reduced MDD’s severity than placebo (OR: 0.52, 95% CI [0.44, 0.62], P < 0.00001, I2 = 0%). Three studies involving 742 MDD patients reported the efficacy of dextromethorphan-bupropion (AXS-50). The reduction of MADRS scores in the treatment group was statistically insignificant, with high variability, favouring the placebo (OR of 1.85 [95% CI: 0.93, 3.70], p = 0.08, I2 = 79%). Additionally, Vortioxetine 10-20 mg/d produced adverse effects, headache, vomiting, nausea, diarrhea, dizziness, nasopharyngitis, somnolence, and suicidal ideation among 6, 669 MDD patients reported by the 9 studies. The finding was statistically significant but with a high variability OR: 15.25, 95% CI [12.55, 18.52], P < 0.00001, I2 = 98%). A preliminary analysis of evidence collected following Desvenlafaxine, AXS-50, and Vortioxetine administration yielded compelling evidence on the efficacy of antidepressants in MDD treatment. Desvenlafaxine and AXS-50 reported reduced severity and symptomatology in MDD, respectively. On the other hand, Vortioxetine implicated adverse effects, which are common with most antidepressants. Despite adverse effects like headache, vomiting, nausea, diarrhea, dizziness, nasopharyngitis, somnolence, and suicidal ideation, antidepressants used to treat MDD yield clinically satisfying outcomes like decreased severity of depression and relief from symptoms. Clinicians should monitor patients to take care of any adverse effects resulting from the treatments. Keywords: Antidepressant efficacy, adverse effects, major depressive disorder, MDD symptomatology, severity, improved outcomes.
抗抑郁药治疗重度抑郁症的比较疗效:系统回顾和荟萃分析
全球约有2.8亿人患有重度抑郁症(MDD),女性的发病率高于男性。发病率的增加意味着健康负担和临床困境,有关现有抗抑郁药的低疗效。在PubMed、Cochrane随机试验图书馆、Scopus和ProQuest等电子数据库中进行文献检索,以报道SNRI (Desvenlafaxine 50mg /d)、5 -羟色胺调节剂(Vortioxetine 10- 20mg /d)和胺酮类抗抑郁药(安非他酮)的疗效。研究选择集中于随机对照试验(rct)和观察性研究。使用Review Manager (RevMan)软件和Python编程完成所有统计分析和可视化。采用随机效应模型、方差分析检验和Cohen’s d进行统计分析。目前的荟萃分析涉及17项研究,包括11,533名参与者。该结果与先前的研究和文献中关于抗抑郁药治疗重度抑郁症的疗效的描述一致。包括2377例MDD患者在内的5项研究报告了具有统计学意义的结果,即地文拉法辛50mg /d比安慰剂降低了MDD的严重程度(OR: 0.52, 95% CI [0.44, 0.62], P <0.00001, i2 = 0%)。三项涉及742名重度抑郁症患者的研究报告了右美沙芬-安非他酮(AXS-50)的疗效。治疗组MADRS评分的降低在统计学上不显著,具有高变异性,有利于安慰剂(OR为1.85 [95% CI: 0.93, 3.70], p = 0.08, I2 = 79%)。此外,沃替西汀10- 20mg /d在9项研究中报告的6669例MDD患者中产生了头痛、呕吐、恶心、腹泻、头晕、鼻咽炎、嗜睡和自杀意念等不良反应。这一发现具有统计学意义,但具有很高的可变性OR: 15.25, 95% CI [12.55, 18.52], P <0.00001, i2 = 98%)。对使用Desvenlafaxine、AXS-50和Vortioxetine后收集的证据进行初步分析,得出了抗抑郁药治疗重度抑郁症疗效的令人信服的证据。据报道,地文拉法辛和AXS-50分别降低了MDD的严重程度和症状。另一方面,沃替西汀有副作用,这在大多数抗抑郁药中很常见。尽管有头痛、呕吐、恶心、腹泻、头晕、鼻咽炎、嗜睡和自杀念头等副作用,但用于治疗重度抑郁症的抗抑郁药在临床上产生了令人满意的结果,比如抑郁症的严重程度降低,症状得到缓解。临床医生应监测患者,注意治疗引起的任何不良反应。关键词:抗抑郁药疗效,不良反应,重度抑郁症,MDD症状,严重程度,改善结局。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信