Cool semi-arid cropping treatments alter Avena fatua's performance and competitive intensity

Christian D. Larson, Mei Ling Wong, Patrick M. Carr, Timothy Seipel
{"title":"Cool semi-arid cropping treatments alter Avena fatua's performance and competitive intensity","authors":"Christian D. Larson,&nbsp;Mei Ling Wong,&nbsp;Patrick M. Carr,&nbsp;Timothy Seipel","doi":"10.1002/sae2.12078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Multiple herbicide-resistant <i>Avena fatua</i> L. is common in the Northern Great Plains, USA. This prevalence and the ecological impacts of tillage in this semi-arid agricultural region have created a need for integrated weed management, with a specific knowledge gap in using annual forage crops and targeted grazing for <i>A. fatua</i> suppression.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A 2-year study in central Montana, USA, assessed <i>A. fatua</i> performance (aboveground biomass, stem density and seed production) in response to seven cropping treatments: (1–4) tall and short spring wheat cultivars crossed with high and low seeding rates, (5–6) annual forage mixture terminated using sheep grazing and simulated haying and (7) tilled fallow. <i>Avena fatua</i>'s competitive intensity in wheat and the annual forage mixture was determined using a relative competition intensity index.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p><i>Avena fatua</i> performance was lowest in tilled fallow, although stem density and seed production did not differ from the grazed annual forage treatment. Response variables were lower in the forage treatments compared with the wheat treatments, and there were no differences among the four fully crossed wheat treatments. Separate analysis of the wheat treatments indicated lower <i>A. fatua</i> biomass and stem density when wheat was sown at a higher rate with no impact of wheat height. <i>Avena fatua</i> competition impacted wheat and forage crops but was more intense for wheat.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Tillage was the most effective treatment at reducing <i>A. fatua</i> performance, but annual forage mixtures can be used to resist <i>A. fatua</i> invasion (reduced <i>A. fatua</i> competitive intensity) and limit its performance after invasion. We conclude that crop sequences that combine higher cash crop (wheat) seeding rates and competitive annual forage mixtures may be utilized to manage <i>A. fatua</i> invaded systems, thereby reducing heavy reliance on tillage in the US Northern Great Plains and similar semi-arid regions.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100834,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Environment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/sae2.12078","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sae2.12078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Multiple herbicide-resistant Avena fatua L. is common in the Northern Great Plains, USA. This prevalence and the ecological impacts of tillage in this semi-arid agricultural region have created a need for integrated weed management, with a specific knowledge gap in using annual forage crops and targeted grazing for A. fatua suppression.

Materials and Methods

A 2-year study in central Montana, USA, assessed A. fatua performance (aboveground biomass, stem density and seed production) in response to seven cropping treatments: (1–4) tall and short spring wheat cultivars crossed with high and low seeding rates, (5–6) annual forage mixture terminated using sheep grazing and simulated haying and (7) tilled fallow. Avena fatua's competitive intensity in wheat and the annual forage mixture was determined using a relative competition intensity index.

Results

Avena fatua performance was lowest in tilled fallow, although stem density and seed production did not differ from the grazed annual forage treatment. Response variables were lower in the forage treatments compared with the wheat treatments, and there were no differences among the four fully crossed wheat treatments. Separate analysis of the wheat treatments indicated lower A. fatua biomass and stem density when wheat was sown at a higher rate with no impact of wheat height. Avena fatua competition impacted wheat and forage crops but was more intense for wheat.

Conclusion

Tillage was the most effective treatment at reducing A. fatua performance, but annual forage mixtures can be used to resist A. fatua invasion (reduced A. fatua competitive intensity) and limit its performance after invasion. We conclude that crop sequences that combine higher cash crop (wheat) seeding rates and competitive annual forage mixtures may be utilized to manage A. fatua invaded systems, thereby reducing heavy reliance on tillage in the US Northern Great Plains and similar semi-arid regions.

Abstract Image

冷凉半干旱种植处理改变了莜麦的生长性能和竞争强度
引言 在美国北部大平原,多种抗除草剂的莜麦(Avena fatua L.)很常见。在这个半干旱农业地区,这种普遍性和耕作对生态的影响产生了对综合杂草管理的需求,而在利用一年生饲料作物和有针对性的放牧来抑制 A. fatua 方面存在具体的知识差距。 材料与方法 在美国蒙大拿州中部进行了一项为期 2 年的研究,评估了 A. fatua 在 7 种耕作处理下的表现(地上生物量、茎密度和种子产量):(1-4)高矮春小麦品种与高低播种率杂交;(5-6)使用绵羊放牧和模拟打草终止一年生牧草混合物;(7)翻耕休耕。利用相对竞争强度指数确定了莜麦在小麦和一年生牧草混合物中的竞争强度。 结果 虽然茎秆密度和种子产量与放牧的一年生牧草处理没有差异,但在翻耕休耕中,莜麦的表现最低。与小麦处理相比,牧草处理的响应变量较低,四种完全杂交的小麦处理之间没有差异。对小麦处理进行的单独分析表明,当小麦播种率较高时,法桐生物量和茎密度较低,而小麦高度则没有影响。Avena fatua 的竞争对小麦和饲料作物都有影响,但对小麦的影响更大。 结论 翻耕是降低法桐表现的最有效处理方法,但一年生饲料混合物可用于抵御法桐入侵(降低法桐竞争强度)并限制其入侵后的表现。我们的结论是,在美国北部大平原和类似的半干旱地区,将较高的经济作物(小麦)播种率和具有竞争力的一年生牧草混合物结合起来的作物序列可用于管理法桐的入侵系统,从而减少对耕作的严重依赖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信