“The farmer, the guide, and the bridge”: the voice of community partners within European Service-Learning

IF 1.9 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Christian Compare, Alžbeta Brozmanová Gregorová, Irene Culcasi, Pilar Aramburuzabala, Cinzia Albanesi
{"title":"“The farmer, the guide, and the bridge”: the voice of community partners within European Service-Learning","authors":"Christian Compare, Alžbeta Brozmanová Gregorová, Irene Culcasi, Pilar Aramburuzabala, Cinzia Albanesi","doi":"10.1080/14681366.2023.2271896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTService-learning (SL) represents one of the actions for community engagement institutionalisation and a way to achieve the teaching and learning objectives of the university and answer local organisations’ needs identified by the community. Studies on the benefits and impacts of service-learning experiences among community partners (rather than students) are rare, especially in higher education and European settings. This study therefore drew on semi-structured interviews with community partners in higher education in three European countries – Italy, Spain, and Slovakia to explore their motivations to join, experiences of, and perspectives on service-learning effects (including organisational empowerment, reciprocity, and civic responsibility).This paper contributes to developing understandings of specific aspects of community partners’ service-learning experiences by exploring the role of reciprocity, how it is oriented and how it relates to the perceived impact of service-learning on community partners’ organisations, their motivations to join SL, and the organisational empowerment that SL can underpin. Consideration is also given to the space allowed to promote a sense of civic responsibility within the experience. Five research questions were posited:1: How do community partners perceive reciprocity? Does this perception change over time?2: What are the perceived SL effects for community partners?3: What are the community partners’ motivations for joining SL?4: What are the effects of SL on community partners’ organisational empowerment?5: To what extent do community partners perceive that SL can promote civic responsibility among university students?KEYWORDS: Service-Learningreciprocitycommunity organizationsempowermentcivic responsibility AcknowledgementThe authors would like to thank the former EOSLHE coordinator, Marta Alonso, Dr. Alvaro Ribeiro, and Dr. Anna Sujova, for conducting some of the interviews analyzed in this paper. They also thank the study participants who shared their experiences and insights on service-learning.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors","PeriodicalId":46617,"journal":{"name":"Pedagogy Culture and Society","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pedagogy Culture and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2023.2271896","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTService-learning (SL) represents one of the actions for community engagement institutionalisation and a way to achieve the teaching and learning objectives of the university and answer local organisations’ needs identified by the community. Studies on the benefits and impacts of service-learning experiences among community partners (rather than students) are rare, especially in higher education and European settings. This study therefore drew on semi-structured interviews with community partners in higher education in three European countries – Italy, Spain, and Slovakia to explore their motivations to join, experiences of, and perspectives on service-learning effects (including organisational empowerment, reciprocity, and civic responsibility).This paper contributes to developing understandings of specific aspects of community partners’ service-learning experiences by exploring the role of reciprocity, how it is oriented and how it relates to the perceived impact of service-learning on community partners’ organisations, their motivations to join SL, and the organisational empowerment that SL can underpin. Consideration is also given to the space allowed to promote a sense of civic responsibility within the experience. Five research questions were posited:1: How do community partners perceive reciprocity? Does this perception change over time?2: What are the perceived SL effects for community partners?3: What are the community partners’ motivations for joining SL?4: What are the effects of SL on community partners’ organisational empowerment?5: To what extent do community partners perceive that SL can promote civic responsibility among university students?KEYWORDS: Service-Learningreciprocitycommunity organizationsempowermentcivic responsibility AcknowledgementThe authors would like to thank the former EOSLHE coordinator, Marta Alonso, Dr. Alvaro Ribeiro, and Dr. Anna Sujova, for conducting some of the interviews analyzed in this paper. They also thank the study participants who shared their experiences and insights on service-learning.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors
“农民、向导和桥梁”:欧洲服务学习中社区伙伴的声音
摘要服务学习(service -learning, SL)是社区参与制度化的行动之一,是实现大学教学目标和满足社区确定的地方组织需求的一种方式。关于社区伙伴(而不是学生)的服务学习经验的好处和影响的研究很少,特别是在高等教育和欧洲环境中。因此,本研究对意大利、西班牙和斯洛伐克这三个欧洲国家的高等教育社区合作伙伴进行了半结构化访谈,以探讨他们加入的动机、经验和对服务学习效果的看法(包括组织授权、互惠和公民责任)。本文通过探索互惠的作用、互惠是如何导向的、互惠如何与服务学习对社区合作伙伴组织的感知影响、社区合作伙伴加入服务学习的动机以及服务学习可以支持的组织授权相关联,有助于加深对社区合作伙伴服务学习经验具体方面的理解。还考虑到允许的空间在体验中促进公民责任感。我们提出了五个研究问题:1 .社区伙伴如何看待互惠?这种看法会随着时间的推移而改变吗?2:对社区伙伴的SL效应是什么?3:社区合作伙伴加入SL的动机是什么?4: SL对社区合作伙伴的组织授权有什么影响?5:社区合作伙伴在多大程度上认为SL可以促进大学生的公民责任?作者要感谢前EOSLHE协调员Marta Alonso、Alvaro Ribeiro博士和Anna Sujova博士进行了本文中分析的一些访谈。他们亦感谢参与研究的人士分享他们在服务学习方面的经验和见解。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pedagogy Culture and Society
Pedagogy Culture and Society EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Pedagogy, Culture & Society is a fully-refereed international journal that seeks to provide an international forum for pedagogy discussion and debate. The identity of the journal is built on the belief that pedagogy debate has the following features: •Pedagogy debate is not restricted by geographical boundaries: its participants are the international educational community and its proceedings appeal to a worldwide audience. •Pedagogy debate is open and democratic: it is not the preserve of teachers, politicians, academics or administrators but requires open discussion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信