“Figuring Out My Part in All of This”: Understanding Ambiguity and Uncertainty in Shaping Teacher Learning within Reform

IF 2 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Carrie D. Allen
{"title":"“Figuring Out My Part in All of This”: Understanding Ambiguity and Uncertainty in Shaping Teacher Learning within Reform","authors":"Carrie D. Allen","doi":"10.1086/727005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Attending to teachers’ instructional contexts is integral for understanding their learning and implementation of education reform. However, there is still much to be understood about the processes that surround teacher decision making and their navigations through change in their work contexts. Research Methods/Approach: This article utilized sensemaking theory to explore decision-making dynamics for eight middle school science teachers adopting instructional practices associated with the Framework for K–12 Science Education and Next Generation Science Standards. Using a multiple case study approach, I examine patterns of teachers’ sensemaking and their connection to instructional decision making over a 2-year period, with particular attention to the sources of ambiguity and uncertainty that initiated sensemaking and how teachers navigated them. Data include interviews, classroom videos, instructional artifacts, and professional development workshop field notes. Findings: Teachers’ institutional knowledge served as a key resource for sensemaking that supported noticing what was new about reform and managing conflicting priorities. Experiencing and resolving ambiguity supported by institutional knowledge tended to lead to greater shifts in classroom practice. However, an absence of institutional knowledge tended to result in feelings of “stuckness” that impeded change. I describe teachers’ navigational strategies to resolve ambiguity, moments of stuckness, and how such experiences shaped the ways reform ideas became integrated into practice. Implications: Designing opportunities for teachers to notice discrepancies and engage in sensemaking, and leveraging teachers’ local expertise and ingenuity, can support teacher learning and change to classroom practice.","PeriodicalId":47629,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Education","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/727005","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Attending to teachers’ instructional contexts is integral for understanding their learning and implementation of education reform. However, there is still much to be understood about the processes that surround teacher decision making and their navigations through change in their work contexts. Research Methods/Approach: This article utilized sensemaking theory to explore decision-making dynamics for eight middle school science teachers adopting instructional practices associated with the Framework for K–12 Science Education and Next Generation Science Standards. Using a multiple case study approach, I examine patterns of teachers’ sensemaking and their connection to instructional decision making over a 2-year period, with particular attention to the sources of ambiguity and uncertainty that initiated sensemaking and how teachers navigated them. Data include interviews, classroom videos, instructional artifacts, and professional development workshop field notes. Findings: Teachers’ institutional knowledge served as a key resource for sensemaking that supported noticing what was new about reform and managing conflicting priorities. Experiencing and resolving ambiguity supported by institutional knowledge tended to lead to greater shifts in classroom practice. However, an absence of institutional knowledge tended to result in feelings of “stuckness” that impeded change. I describe teachers’ navigational strategies to resolve ambiguity, moments of stuckness, and how such experiences shaped the ways reform ideas became integrated into practice. Implications: Designing opportunities for teachers to notice discrepancies and engage in sensemaking, and leveraging teachers’ local expertise and ingenuity, can support teacher learning and change to classroom practice.
“弄清楚我在这一切中的角色”:理解在改革中塑造教师学习的模糊性和不确定性
目的:关注教师的教学情境是理解教师学习和实施教育改革的必要条件。然而,围绕教师决策的过程以及他们在工作环境变化中的导航,仍有很多需要了解的地方。研究方法/途径:本文运用语义构建理论探讨了8名中学科学教师在K-12科学教育框架与下一代科学标准相关教学实践中的决策动态。使用多案例研究方法,我研究了教师在2年期间的语义构建模式及其与教学决策的联系,特别关注了引发语义构建的模糊性和不确定性的来源,以及教师如何引导它们。数据包括访谈、课堂视频、教学文物和专业发展研讨会现场笔记。研究结果:教师的制度知识是语义构建的关键资源,有助于注意到改革的新内容和管理相互冲突的优先事项。在制度知识的支持下体验和解决歧义往往会导致课堂实践的更大转变。然而,缺乏制度知识往往会导致阻碍变革的“停滞”感。我描述了教师的导航策略,以解决模棱两可,停滞的时刻,以及这些经验如何塑造了改革思想融入实践的方式。启示:设计机会让教师注意到差异并参与意义建构,并利用教师的本地专业知识和创造力,可以支持教师的学习和课堂实践的改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Education
American Journal of Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
4.00%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Founded as School Review in 1893, the American Journal of Education acquired its present name in November 1979. The Journal seeks to bridge and integrate the intellectual, methodological, and substantive diversity of educational scholarship, and to encourage a vigorous dialogue between educational scholars and practitioners. To achieve that goal, papers are published that present research, theoretical statements, philosophical arguments, critical syntheses of a field of educational inquiry, and integrations of educational scholarship, policy, and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信