Analytic-holistic cognitive styles affect consumer responses to food and beverage samples during sensory evaluation

IF 6.2 2区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Thadeus L. Beekman, Han-Seok Seo
{"title":"Analytic-holistic cognitive styles affect consumer responses to food and beverage samples during sensory evaluation","authors":"Thadeus L. Beekman,&nbsp;Han-Seok Seo","doi":"10.1016/j.crfs.2023.100635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Recent studies have shown that the analytic-holistic theory is applicable in sensory science-related areas. Analytic and holistic cognitive style groups have been found to have significantly different perceptions and behaviors within food-related scenarios. These differences were further investigated and identified within the current study, focusing on specific areas of common sensory tests and analyses where analytic and holistic cognitive style groups may differ from one another. Before the main study, 419 volunteers were classified into three groups based on their scores to the Analysis-Holism Scale (AHS). The extreme groups (65 adults for each) were identified as the “analytic” and “holistic” cognitive style groups, respectively. Participants evaluated fruit-flavored beverages and fruit samples for their impression of the intensity or hedonic aspects in the study conducted over two sessions. Each session either employed solely category or line scale for the questions. Analyses focused on the analytic and holistic group comparisons in mean, variance, penalty analysis, and pre- and post-AHS score differences. Results showed that the holistic group exhibited significantly higher mean scores and standard deviations in the hedonic ratings of fruit samples than the analytic group did. Compared to the analytic group, the holistic group showed significantly smaller mean drops in overall liking across the five Just-About-Right (JAR) questions related to flavors or tastes of the mixed-fruit flavored water. A significant difference between the AHS scores measured before and after the sensory evaluation was observed in the holistic group, but not in the analytic group. In conclusion, our findings provide empirical evidence that cognitive styles affect consumer responses to food or beverage samples during sensory evaluation tasks. This implies that sensory professionals may consider these analytic-holistic contrasts while exploring consumer responses to their target samples.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10939,"journal":{"name":"Current Research in Food Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665927123002034/pdfft?md5=573565b21b66ec1e781bcf84b4124ac1&pid=1-s2.0-S2665927123002034-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Research in Food Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665927123002034","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent studies have shown that the analytic-holistic theory is applicable in sensory science-related areas. Analytic and holistic cognitive style groups have been found to have significantly different perceptions and behaviors within food-related scenarios. These differences were further investigated and identified within the current study, focusing on specific areas of common sensory tests and analyses where analytic and holistic cognitive style groups may differ from one another. Before the main study, 419 volunteers were classified into three groups based on their scores to the Analysis-Holism Scale (AHS). The extreme groups (65 adults for each) were identified as the “analytic” and “holistic” cognitive style groups, respectively. Participants evaluated fruit-flavored beverages and fruit samples for their impression of the intensity or hedonic aspects in the study conducted over two sessions. Each session either employed solely category or line scale for the questions. Analyses focused on the analytic and holistic group comparisons in mean, variance, penalty analysis, and pre- and post-AHS score differences. Results showed that the holistic group exhibited significantly higher mean scores and standard deviations in the hedonic ratings of fruit samples than the analytic group did. Compared to the analytic group, the holistic group showed significantly smaller mean drops in overall liking across the five Just-About-Right (JAR) questions related to flavors or tastes of the mixed-fruit flavored water. A significant difference between the AHS scores measured before and after the sensory evaluation was observed in the holistic group, but not in the analytic group. In conclusion, our findings provide empirical evidence that cognitive styles affect consumer responses to food or beverage samples during sensory evaluation tasks. This implies that sensory professionals may consider these analytic-holistic contrasts while exploring consumer responses to their target samples.

Abstract Image

分析-逻辑认知风格影响消费者在感官评估过程中对食品和饮料样品的反应
最近的研究表明,分析-整体理论适用于感官科学相关领域。研究发现,在与食物相关的场景中,分析型认知风格组和整体型认知风格组在感知和行为上存在显著差异。本研究对这些差异进行了进一步调查和识别,重点关注分析型和整体型认知风格组在常见感官测试和分析中可能存在差异的特定领域。在进行主要研究之前,419 名志愿者根据他们在分析-好恶量表(AHS)上的得分被分为三组。极端组(每组 65 名成人)分别被认定为 "分析型 "和 "整体型 "认知风格组。在分两次进行的研究中,参与者对果味饮料和水果样品的强度或享乐性方面的印象进行评价。每个环节的问题都采用了单一类别或线性量表。分析的重点是分析组和整体组在平均值、方差、惩罚分析以及前后 AHS 分数差异方面的比较。结果显示,整体组对水果样本的享乐性评分的平均分和标准差都明显高于分析组。与分析法组相比,整体法组在与混合水果味水的风味或口味相关的五个 "完全正确"(JAR)问题上的总体喜好平均值下降幅度明显较小。在感官评估前后测量的 AHS 分数之间,整体组出现了明显的差异,而分析组则没有。总之,我们的研究结果提供了实证证据,表明认知风格会影响消费者在感官评价任务中对食品或饮料样品的反应。这意味着感官专业人员在探索消费者对目标样品的反应时,可以考虑这些分析与整体的对比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Research in Food Science
Current Research in Food Science Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
232
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: Current Research in Food Science is an international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to advancing the breadth of knowledge in the field of food science. It serves as a platform for publishing original research articles and short communications that encompass a wide array of topics, including food chemistry, physics, microbiology, nutrition, nutraceuticals, process and package engineering, materials science, food sustainability, and food security. By covering these diverse areas, the journal aims to provide a comprehensive source of the latest scientific findings and technological advancements that are shaping the future of the food industry. The journal's scope is designed to address the multidisciplinary nature of food science, reflecting its commitment to promoting innovation and ensuring the safety and quality of the food supply.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信