Rodzina wobec nowych wyzwań w sferze publicznej

Piotr Mazurkiewicz
{"title":"Rodzina wobec nowych wyzwań w sferze publicznej","authors":"Piotr Mazurkiewicz","doi":"10.30439/wst.2023.1.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"New challenges coming from the public sphere, which the family must face, can originate from processes occurring in society or in political or economic institutions. They can be seen as spontaneous processes or as deliberate actions. They can be bottom-up or top-down in nature. When it comes to their subject matter, they mainly concern the issue of redefining marriage, the broadly understanded fertility and the role of parents in the child-rearing process. The redefinition of marriage is not just about negating the necessary sex difference in marriage, but, at a deeper level, also about passage from marriage understood as a natural union to marriage understood as a contract. What is taking place here is a shift in political anthropology, i.e., a shift from a vision of man as an inherently social being, and in particular inherently destined to live in marriage - an indissoluble union of one man and one woman, open to having offspring - to a vision of man as an autonomous individual with no obligations to other people unless they are accepted consciously and voluntarily, and can be dissolved or renegotiated at any time. Atomistic individualism leads to the perception of all human ties as restricting individual freedom. Hence abortion (the ability to free oneself from a child), divorce (the ability for one person to withdraw consent) or migration (the ability to leave the broader community) and the legal guarantees of such choices are seen as necessary backstops to individual freedom. The reproductive controversy is rooted in negative attitudes toward the child as an individual person and negative attitudes toward fertility in general (paradigm of overpopulation, anthropogenic climate change). The child, therefore, either violates the rights of parents or poses a threat to humanity. The article specifically examines the relationship of the challenges facing the family today to the dominance of liberal ideology and the phenomenon of secularization.","PeriodicalId":485414,"journal":{"name":"Warszawskie Studia Teologiczne","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Warszawskie Studia Teologiczne","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30439/wst.2023.1.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

New challenges coming from the public sphere, which the family must face, can originate from processes occurring in society or in political or economic institutions. They can be seen as spontaneous processes or as deliberate actions. They can be bottom-up or top-down in nature. When it comes to their subject matter, they mainly concern the issue of redefining marriage, the broadly understanded fertility and the role of parents in the child-rearing process. The redefinition of marriage is not just about negating the necessary sex difference in marriage, but, at a deeper level, also about passage from marriage understood as a natural union to marriage understood as a contract. What is taking place here is a shift in political anthropology, i.e., a shift from a vision of man as an inherently social being, and in particular inherently destined to live in marriage - an indissoluble union of one man and one woman, open to having offspring - to a vision of man as an autonomous individual with no obligations to other people unless they are accepted consciously and voluntarily, and can be dissolved or renegotiated at any time. Atomistic individualism leads to the perception of all human ties as restricting individual freedom. Hence abortion (the ability to free oneself from a child), divorce (the ability for one person to withdraw consent) or migration (the ability to leave the broader community) and the legal guarantees of such choices are seen as necessary backstops to individual freedom. The reproductive controversy is rooted in negative attitudes toward the child as an individual person and negative attitudes toward fertility in general (paradigm of overpopulation, anthropogenic climate change). The child, therefore, either violates the rights of parents or poses a threat to humanity. The article specifically examines the relationship of the challenges facing the family today to the dominance of liberal ideology and the phenomenon of secularization.
面对公共领域新挑战的家庭
家庭必须面对的来自公共领域的新挑战可能源于社会或政治或经济机构中发生的进程。它们可以被看作是自发的过程,也可以被看作是深思熟虑的行为。它们可以是自底向上的,也可以是自顶向下的。当涉及到主题时,他们主要关注重新定义婚姻的问题,被广泛理解的生育问题以及父母在抚养孩子过程中的角色。对婚姻的重新定义不仅仅是否定婚姻中必要的性别差异,而且,在更深层次上,也是关于从被理解为自然结合的婚姻到被理解为契约的婚姻的过渡。这里正在发生的是政治人类学的转变,也就是说,从把人看作是天生的社会存在,特别是天生注定要生活在婚姻中——一个男人和一个女人的不可分割的结合,可以生育后代——到把人看作是一个自主的个体,对其他人没有义务,除非他们被有意识地和自愿地接受,并且可以随时解散或重新谈判。原子主义的个人主义使人认为所有的人际关系都是限制个人自由的。因此,堕胎(摆脱孩子的能力)、离婚(一方撤回同意的能力)或移民(离开更广泛社区的能力)以及对这些选择的法律保障被视为个人自由的必要保障。生殖争议的根源在于对儿童作为个体的消极态度和对生育的消极态度(人口过剩、人为气候变化的范例)。因此,儿童要么侵犯父母的权利,要么对人类构成威胁。本文具体考察了当今家庭所面临的挑战与自由主义意识形态的主导地位和世俗化现象之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信