Early Childhood Education Attendance and Students’ Later Outcomes in Europe

IF 1.1 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS
Daniela Del Boca, Chiara Monfardini, Sarah Grace See
{"title":"Early Childhood Education Attendance and Students’ Later Outcomes in Europe","authors":"Daniela Del Boca, Chiara Monfardini, Sarah Grace See","doi":"10.1515/bejeap-2022-0260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The importance of investments in early childhood education (ECE) has been widely documented in the literature. Among the benefits, particularly for children from disadvantaged backgrounds, is its potential to mitigate educational inequality. However, some evidence also suggests that the positive effects of ECE on later outcomes tend to dissipate over time, leaving children who attended such programmes no better off academically than those who did not. This paper studies the relationship between students’ years spent in ECE, from 0 to before starting primary school, and the results of their educational assessment outcomes at age 15. Using PISA survey data for 14 European countries from 2015 to 2018, we conduct a cross-country comparison of student performance in reading, mathematics, and science, correlating the results to the duration of ECE attendance. Our findings show that duration in ECE is associated with better assessments at age 15, but that the benefit is nonlinear and peaks at 3–4 years of attendance. Gender and migration background are associated with student performance on the assessments; but we don’t find evidence of heterogeneity in the relationship between ECE duration and test outcomes based on gender and migration background. Instead, we document differential effects of ECE duration according to age of entry to ECE, mother’s education, and the type of educational system attended.","PeriodicalId":47400,"journal":{"name":"B E Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy","volume":"97 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"B E Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/bejeap-2022-0260","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The importance of investments in early childhood education (ECE) has been widely documented in the literature. Among the benefits, particularly for children from disadvantaged backgrounds, is its potential to mitigate educational inequality. However, some evidence also suggests that the positive effects of ECE on later outcomes tend to dissipate over time, leaving children who attended such programmes no better off academically than those who did not. This paper studies the relationship between students’ years spent in ECE, from 0 to before starting primary school, and the results of their educational assessment outcomes at age 15. Using PISA survey data for 14 European countries from 2015 to 2018, we conduct a cross-country comparison of student performance in reading, mathematics, and science, correlating the results to the duration of ECE attendance. Our findings show that duration in ECE is associated with better assessments at age 15, but that the benefit is nonlinear and peaks at 3–4 years of attendance. Gender and migration background are associated with student performance on the assessments; but we don’t find evidence of heterogeneity in the relationship between ECE duration and test outcomes based on gender and migration background. Instead, we document differential effects of ECE duration according to age of entry to ECE, mother’s education, and the type of educational system attended.
欧洲儿童早期教育出勤率与学生的后期成就
在早期儿童教育(ECE)投资的重要性已在文献中广泛记录。它的好处之一,特别是对来自弱势背景的儿童来说,是它有可能减轻教育不平等。然而,一些证据也表明,欧洲经委会对后来的结果的积极影响往往会随着时间的推移而消散,使参加这些课程的儿童在学业上并不比没有参加这些课程的儿童更好。本文研究了学生从0岁到上小学前在ECE学习的年数与他们15岁时的教育评估结果之间的关系。利用2015年至2018年14个欧洲国家的PISA调查数据,我们对学生在阅读、数学和科学方面的表现进行了跨国比较,并将结果与参加欧洲经委会的时间联系起来。我们的研究结果表明,ECE的持续时间与15岁时更好的评估有关,但这种好处是非线性的,并在参加的3-4年达到顶峰。性别和移民背景与学生在评估中的表现有关;但我们没有发现基于性别和移民背景的ECE持续时间和测试结果之间存在异质性的证据。相反,我们根据进入ECE的年龄、母亲的教育程度和所参加的教育系统类型,记录了ECE持续时间的差异影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy welcomes submissions that employ microeconomics to analyze issues in business, consumer behavior, and public policy. We aim to be an international forum for scholarship, whether the scholarship considers an issue that is general or that pertains to a particular country or region, but authors should bear in mind that our readers come from around the world. Potential issues of interest include: the interaction of firms, the functioning of markets, the effects of domestic and international policy, and the design of organizations and institutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信