A Double Margin

IF 0.1 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Fluminensia Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.31820/f.35.1.2
Mirela Dakić, Marina Protrka Štimec
{"title":"<i>A Double Margin</i>","authors":"Mirela Dakić, Marina Protrka Štimec","doi":"10.31820/f.35.1.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Studying the share of women in the historical avant-garde movements, Susan Rubin Suleiman (1990) supported Marguerite Duras's assessment of the avant-garde women writers as being “doubly intolerable” – since they do not correspond to the usual revolutionary point of view or that of women. Suleiman introduced the concept of the double margin to refer to the problem of critical and historical reception of women’s avant-garde writing. Since the procedures of the double marginalisation of women’s avant-garde poetics can be observed in different cultural contexts and literary fields, in this paper we will analyse the critical and historical reception of women writers on the Croatian and Yugoslav literary scene who contributed to the literary magazine Krugovi ( Circles , 1952–1958) in the 1950s. Although this generation of writers interprets the aspiration of poetry towards a “universal language” (A. Rimbaud) following the avant-garde usages of grammar, figures of speech, and a depoeticised vocabulary, the traditional readings of women's poetics are often based on the expression of women’s experience, the mind and body split, and the biographical interpretation. On the other hand, the oeuvres of women from the Krugovi generation call for a revaluation of the relation between their poetic strategies and the possible gender politics of their poetry. Therefore, we will demonstrate the possibilities of this revaluation by turning to poetical choices, treatment of the lyric subject and the genre in the texts of Vesna Krmpotić, Vesna Parun, and Irena Vrkljan.","PeriodicalId":41722,"journal":{"name":"Fluminensia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fluminensia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31820/f.35.1.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Studying the share of women in the historical avant-garde movements, Susan Rubin Suleiman (1990) supported Marguerite Duras's assessment of the avant-garde women writers as being “doubly intolerable” – since they do not correspond to the usual revolutionary point of view or that of women. Suleiman introduced the concept of the double margin to refer to the problem of critical and historical reception of women’s avant-garde writing. Since the procedures of the double marginalisation of women’s avant-garde poetics can be observed in different cultural contexts and literary fields, in this paper we will analyse the critical and historical reception of women writers on the Croatian and Yugoslav literary scene who contributed to the literary magazine Krugovi ( Circles , 1952–1958) in the 1950s. Although this generation of writers interprets the aspiration of poetry towards a “universal language” (A. Rimbaud) following the avant-garde usages of grammar, figures of speech, and a depoeticised vocabulary, the traditional readings of women's poetics are often based on the expression of women’s experience, the mind and body split, and the biographical interpretation. On the other hand, the oeuvres of women from the Krugovi generation call for a revaluation of the relation between their poetic strategies and the possible gender politics of their poetry. Therefore, we will demonstrate the possibilities of this revaluation by turning to poetical choices, treatment of the lyric subject and the genre in the texts of Vesna Krmpotić, Vesna Parun, and Irena Vrkljan.
双页边距
苏珊·鲁宾·苏莱曼(Susan Rubin Suleiman, 1990)研究了历史上先锋派运动中女性所占的份额,她支持玛格丽特·杜拉斯对先锋派女作家的评价,认为她们是“双重不可容忍的”——因为她们不符合通常的革命观点或女性观点。Suleiman引入了双页边距的概念来指代女性先锋写作的批判和历史接受问题。由于女性先锋派诗学的双重边缘化过程可以在不同的文化背景和文学领域中观察到,在本文中,我们将分析20世纪50年代克罗地亚和南斯拉夫文坛上为文学杂志Krugovi(圆圈,1952-1958)做出贡献的女性作家的批评和历史接受。尽管这一代作家遵循先锋派的语法用法、修辞手法和去诗化的词汇来解读诗歌对“通用语言”(兰波)的渴望,但传统的女性诗学解读往往基于女性经验的表达、身心的分裂和传记式的解读。另一方面,克鲁戈维一代女性的作品要求我们重新评估她们的诗歌策略与其诗歌中可能存在的性别政治之间的关系。因此,我们将展示这种重新评估的可能性,通过转向诗歌的选择,抒情主题的处理和文本中的维斯纳·克姆波蒂奇,维斯纳·帕伦和伊雷娜·弗尔克利扬。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Fluminensia
Fluminensia LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信