The normalization of vowel formants – a case study of Croatian and Serbian

IF 0.1 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Fluminensia Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.31820/f.35.1.6
Iva Bašić, Gordana Varošanec-Škarić
{"title":"The normalization of vowel formants – a case study of Croatian and Serbian","authors":"Iva Bašić, Gordana Varošanec-Škarić","doi":"10.31820/f.35.1.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study was to compare the results of a traditional formant analysis of vowels with the results of normalization systems on the example of Croatian and Serbian speech. Male native speakers of Croatian and Serbian were used for this study (N=92). Traditional results of formant analyses express differences among analysed groups of speakers caused by linguistic, sociolinguistic, but also physiological factors. Considering that the values of formant vowels are influenced by many factors, including idiosyncratic physiological characteristics of the vocal tract, normalization approaches remove those variables among speakers that are caused by mutual physiological differences. Therefore, the dialectal, inter-linguistic and/or sociolinguistic differences among speakers whose speech is being analysed are isolated in a scientifically more objective way. The results of this study have shown that formant values are more grouped together and centralized (especially in vowels [a] and [i]), than in non-normalized results within each language individually. This contrastive analysis has shown that in Croatian [i], [o] and [u] are more closed and frontal, the vowel [a] is more closed and back, and the vowel [e] is more open and front, in relation to the vowels in Serbian. This study exemplifies the advantage of normalization systems in the interpretation of acoustic results.","PeriodicalId":41722,"journal":{"name":"Fluminensia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fluminensia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31820/f.35.1.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the results of a traditional formant analysis of vowels with the results of normalization systems on the example of Croatian and Serbian speech. Male native speakers of Croatian and Serbian were used for this study (N=92). Traditional results of formant analyses express differences among analysed groups of speakers caused by linguistic, sociolinguistic, but also physiological factors. Considering that the values of formant vowels are influenced by many factors, including idiosyncratic physiological characteristics of the vocal tract, normalization approaches remove those variables among speakers that are caused by mutual physiological differences. Therefore, the dialectal, inter-linguistic and/or sociolinguistic differences among speakers whose speech is being analysed are isolated in a scientifically more objective way. The results of this study have shown that formant values are more grouped together and centralized (especially in vowels [a] and [i]), than in non-normalized results within each language individually. This contrastive analysis has shown that in Croatian [i], [o] and [u] are more closed and frontal, the vowel [a] is more closed and back, and the vowel [e] is more open and front, in relation to the vowels in Serbian. This study exemplifies the advantage of normalization systems in the interpretation of acoustic results.
元音共振元音的规范化——克罗地亚语和塞尔维亚语的案例研究
本研究的目的是比较传统元音构象分析的结果与标准化系统对克罗地亚语和塞尔维亚语语音的结果。本研究使用母语为克罗地亚语和塞尔维亚语的男性(N=92)。传统的形成峰分析结果表达了被分析群体之间的差异,这些差异是由语言、社会语言学和生理因素造成的。考虑到形成峰元音的值受到许多因素的影响,包括声道的特殊生理特征,标准化方法消除了说话者之间由相互生理差异引起的变量。因此,被分析的说话者之间的方言、语言间和/或社会语言差异以一种更科学客观的方式被隔离出来。这项研究的结果表明,形成峰值更多地集中在一起(特别是在元音[a]和[i]中),而不是在每种语言中单独的非规范化结果中。对比分析表明,克罗地亚语[i]、[o]和[u]的元音更加封闭和正面,元音[a]的元音更加封闭和向后,元音[e]的元音更加开放和正面,与塞尔维亚语中的元音相比。这项研究举例说明了归一化系统在解释声学结果方面的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Fluminensia
Fluminensia LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信