Evaluating the level of inquiry in postsecondary instructional laboratory experiments: results of a national survey

IF 2.6 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Kendall M. Zammit, Megan C. Connor and Jeffrey R. Raker
{"title":"Evaluating the level of inquiry in postsecondary instructional laboratory experiments: results of a national survey","authors":"Kendall M. Zammit, Megan C. Connor and Jeffrey R. Raker","doi":"10.1039/D3RP00154G","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >A national survey on chemistry instructional laboratories was administered to faculty members at four-year postsecondary institutions in the United States for the purpose of exploring levels of inquiry-based instruction implemented in laboratory courses. Respondents were asked to rate the level of choice their students had in deciding six key characteristics of the experiments used in their course (<em>e.g.</em>, what research questions to explore); the more choices students get to make, the more inquiry-based instructional experience. MANOVA and <em>post hoc</em> analyses suggest that there are differences in the level of inquiry across chemistry course levels; lower-level courses (<em>i.e.</em>, general chemistry and organic chemistry) implement lower levels of inquiry-based laboratory instruction compared to upper-level courses (<em>i.e.</em> more chemistry major-focused courses). We found no evidence of association between the level of inquiry courses and institutions’ highest chemistry degree awarded, American Chemical Society approval to award certified bachelors degrees, or external funding to transform postsecondary chemistry courses. Our study contributes to the chemical education community's growing understanding of the state of postsecondary chemistry laboratory instruction. Results further suggest that there is an opportunity for faculty members and department leaders to reflect on their instructional laboratory courses and implement more inquiry-based instructional laboratory experiences across the entirety of the postsecondary chemistry curriculum.</p>","PeriodicalId":69,"journal":{"name":"Chemistry Education Research and Practice","volume":" 1","pages":" 79-91"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemistry Education Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2024/rp/d3rp00154g","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A national survey on chemistry instructional laboratories was administered to faculty members at four-year postsecondary institutions in the United States for the purpose of exploring levels of inquiry-based instruction implemented in laboratory courses. Respondents were asked to rate the level of choice their students had in deciding six key characteristics of the experiments used in their course (e.g., what research questions to explore); the more choices students get to make, the more inquiry-based instructional experience. MANOVA and post hoc analyses suggest that there are differences in the level of inquiry across chemistry course levels; lower-level courses (i.e., general chemistry and organic chemistry) implement lower levels of inquiry-based laboratory instruction compared to upper-level courses (i.e. more chemistry major-focused courses). We found no evidence of association between the level of inquiry courses and institutions’ highest chemistry degree awarded, American Chemical Society approval to award certified bachelors degrees, or external funding to transform postsecondary chemistry courses. Our study contributes to the chemical education community's growing understanding of the state of postsecondary chemistry laboratory instruction. Results further suggest that there is an opportunity for faculty members and department leaders to reflect on their instructional laboratory courses and implement more inquiry-based instructional laboratory experiences across the entirety of the postsecondary chemistry curriculum.

评估中学后教学实验的探究水平:全国调查的结果
为了探索在实验课程中实施探究式教学的水平,我们对美国四年制中学后教育机构的教师进行了一项有关化学教学实验室的全国性调查。调查要求受访者对其学生在决定课程所用实验的六个关键特征(如探索哪些研究问题)方面的选择程度进行评分;学生的选择越多,探究式教学的经验就越丰富。MANOVA 和事后分析表明,不同层次的化学课程在探究水平上存在差异;与高层次课程(即更注重化学专业的课程)相比,低层次课程(即普通化学和有机化学)实施探究式实验教学的水平较低。我们没有发现任何证据表明,探究课程的水平与院校授予的最高化学学位、美国化学学会批准授予的认证学士学位或外部资金对中学后化学课程的改造之间存在关联。我们的研究有助于化学教育界进一步了解中学后化学实验教学的现状。研究结果进一步表明,教师和系领导有机会反思他们的实验教学课程,并在整个中学后化学课程中实施更多基于探究的实验教学体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
26.70%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal for teachers, researchers and other practitioners in chemistry education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信