Repeating Her Autonomy: Beauvoir, Kierkegaard, and Women's Liberation

IF 1 1区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY
Dana Rognlie
{"title":"Repeating Her Autonomy: Beauvoir, Kierkegaard, and Women's Liberation","authors":"Dana Rognlie","doi":"10.1017/hyp.2023.58","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In The Second Sex, Simone de Beauvoir diagnoses “woman” as the “lost sex,” torn between her individual autonomy and her “feminine destiny.” Becoming a “real woman” in patriarchal societies demands that women lose their authentic, autonomous selves to become the “inessential Other” for Man. To better understand this diagnosis and how women might refind themselves, I rehabilitate the influence of Søren Kierkegaard and his concept of repetition as what must be lost to be found again in Beauvoir's account of freedom and, specifically, the liberation of women. Beauvoir offers a dual account of repetition, that of mundane repetition and sacrificial repetition, bringing them to bear both on her diagnosis of women's oppression and her theorization of our liberation. Sacrificial repetition becomes a temporality for freedom—one must be able to repeat or retake their autonomy continuously toward an open future. For this to happen concretely, Beauvoir insists that we must sacrifice the (racist, classist) patriarchal ideals of the “real woman” and “real man” as we retake our autonomy and reconfigure the meaning of sex difference anew.","PeriodicalId":47921,"journal":{"name":"Hypatia-A Journal of Feminist Philosophy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hypatia-A Journal of Feminist Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/hyp.2023.58","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract In The Second Sex, Simone de Beauvoir diagnoses “woman” as the “lost sex,” torn between her individual autonomy and her “feminine destiny.” Becoming a “real woman” in patriarchal societies demands that women lose their authentic, autonomous selves to become the “inessential Other” for Man. To better understand this diagnosis and how women might refind themselves, I rehabilitate the influence of Søren Kierkegaard and his concept of repetition as what must be lost to be found again in Beauvoir's account of freedom and, specifically, the liberation of women. Beauvoir offers a dual account of repetition, that of mundane repetition and sacrificial repetition, bringing them to bear both on her diagnosis of women's oppression and her theorization of our liberation. Sacrificial repetition becomes a temporality for freedom—one must be able to repeat or retake their autonomy continuously toward an open future. For this to happen concretely, Beauvoir insists that we must sacrifice the (racist, classist) patriarchal ideals of the “real woman” and “real man” as we retake our autonomy and reconfigure the meaning of sex difference anew.
重复她的自主性:波伏娃、克尔凯郭尔与妇女解放
在《第二性》中,西蒙娜·德·波伏娃将“女人”诊断为“迷失的性”,在她的个人自主权和“女性命运”之间徘徊。在男权社会中,成为“真正的女人”要求女性失去真实的、自主的自我,成为男性的“非必要的他者”。为了更好地理解这种诊断,以及女性如何重新找到自己,我恢复了索伦·克尔凯郭尔的影响,以及他的重复概念,因为在波伏娃对自由的描述中,尤其是对女性解放的描述中,必须丢失才能重新找到。波伏娃提供了重复的双重描述,即世俗的重复和牺牲的重复,将它们与她对女性压迫的诊断和她对我们解放的理论结合起来。牺牲的重复成为自由的暂时性——一个人必须能够不断地重复或重新获得他们的自主权,走向一个开放的未来。为了具体实现这一点,波伏娃坚持认为,当我们重新获得自主权并重新配置性别差异的意义时,我们必须牺牲(种族主义的、阶级主义的)“真正的女人”和“真正的男人”的父权理想。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信