Coral reefs, cloud forests and radical climate interventions in Australia’s Wet Tropics and Great Barrier Reef

Benjamin K. Sovacool, Chad M. Baum, Sean Low, Livia Fritz
{"title":"Coral reefs, cloud forests and radical climate interventions in Australia’s Wet Tropics and Great Barrier Reef","authors":"Benjamin K. Sovacool, Chad M. Baum, Sean Low, Livia Fritz","doi":"10.1371/journal.pclm.0000221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Given the inadequacy of current patterns of climate mitigation, calls for rapid climate protection are beginning to explore and endorse potentially radical options. Based on fieldwork involving original expert interviews (N = 23) and extensive site visits (N = 23) in Australia, this empirical study explores four types of climate interventions spanning climate differing degrees of radicalism: adaptation, solar geoengineering, forestry and ecosystems restoration, and carbon removal. It examines ongoing efforts to engage in selective breeding and assisted adaptation of coral species to be introduced on the Great Barrier Reef, as well as to implement regional solar geoengineering in the form of fogging and marine cloud brightening. It also examines related attempts at both nature-based and engineered forms of carbon removal vis-à-vis ecosystem restoration via forestry conservation and reforestation in the Wet Tropics of Queensland World Heritage Area, and enhanced weathering and ocean alkalinization. This portfolio of climate interventions challenges existing categorizations and typologies of climate action. Moreover, the study identifies positive synergies and coupling between the options themselves, but also lingering trade-offs and risks needing to be taken into account. It discusses three inductive themes which emerged from the qualitative data: complexity and coupling, risk and multi-scalar effects, and radicality and governance. It elucidates these themes with an attempt to generalize lessons learned for other communities around the world considering climate interventions to protect forests, preserve coral reefs, or implement carbon removal and solar geoengineering.","PeriodicalId":74463,"journal":{"name":"PLOS climate","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS climate","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Given the inadequacy of current patterns of climate mitigation, calls for rapid climate protection are beginning to explore and endorse potentially radical options. Based on fieldwork involving original expert interviews (N = 23) and extensive site visits (N = 23) in Australia, this empirical study explores four types of climate interventions spanning climate differing degrees of radicalism: adaptation, solar geoengineering, forestry and ecosystems restoration, and carbon removal. It examines ongoing efforts to engage in selective breeding and assisted adaptation of coral species to be introduced on the Great Barrier Reef, as well as to implement regional solar geoengineering in the form of fogging and marine cloud brightening. It also examines related attempts at both nature-based and engineered forms of carbon removal vis-à-vis ecosystem restoration via forestry conservation and reforestation in the Wet Tropics of Queensland World Heritage Area, and enhanced weathering and ocean alkalinization. This portfolio of climate interventions challenges existing categorizations and typologies of climate action. Moreover, the study identifies positive synergies and coupling between the options themselves, but also lingering trade-offs and risks needing to be taken into account. It discusses three inductive themes which emerged from the qualitative data: complexity and coupling, risk and multi-scalar effects, and radicality and governance. It elucidates these themes with an attempt to generalize lessons learned for other communities around the world considering climate interventions to protect forests, preserve coral reefs, or implement carbon removal and solar geoengineering.
珊瑚礁,云雾森林和激进的气候干预在澳大利亚湿热带和大堡礁
鉴于目前减缓气候变化模式的不足,要求迅速保护气候的呼声开始探索和支持可能激进的选择。基于对澳大利亚的实地调查(N = 23)和广泛的实地考察(N = 23),本实证研究探讨了四种类型的气候干预措施,涵盖了不同程度的激进主义气候:适应、太阳能地球工程、林业和生态系统恢复以及碳去除。它审查了正在进行的从事选择性繁殖和协助适应将引入大堡礁的珊瑚物种的努力,以及以雾化和海洋云增亮的形式实施区域太阳能地球工程。它还研究了基于自然和工程形式的碳去除的相关尝试,通过森林保护和昆士兰州世界遗产地区湿热带地区的重新造林来恢复生态系统,以及增强风化和海洋碱化。这一系列气候干预措施挑战了现有的气候行动分类和类型。此外,该研究确定了这些选择本身之间的积极协同作用和耦合,但也需要考虑到挥之不去的权衡和风险。它讨论了从定性数据中出现的三个归纳主题:复杂性和耦合,风险和多标量效应,以及激进性和治理。它阐明了这些主题,并试图为世界上其他考虑气候干预以保护森林、保护珊瑚礁或实施碳去除和太阳能地球工程的社区总结经验教训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信