Spatial logic of scientific research: an exploratory and quantitative analysis of 42 scientific research buildings sited in America and Europe

IF 2.7 4区工程技术 Q2 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY

Architectural Engineering and Design Management Pub Date : 2023-11-06 DOI:10.1080/17452007.2023.2270650

Xinwei Zhang, Tong Cui, Jun Lan

{"title":"Spatial logic of scientific research: an exploratory and quantitative analysis of 42 scientific research buildings sited in America and Europe","authors":"Xinwei Zhang, Tong Cui, Jun Lan","doi":"10.1080/17452007.2023.2270650","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTSince the nineteenth-century devolution of natural philosophy into disciplines, scientific activity has expanded from single-disciplined research to comprehensive research. The flow of information between different research teams makes scientific research and its places increasingly social, which is no longer limited to the closed laboratory workbench. Reviewing the literature, we found that the development of scientific research buildings experienced a transition from efficiency to openness. And the new organization of research communities and its demand for space put forward higher requirements for scientific research buildings. To deeply explore the design trends of scientific research buildings at this stage, the sample database is established using space syntax and K-means clustering algorithm software to quantitatively analyze spatial layouts of 42 scientific research buildings worldwide from the perspective of sociology and innovation, clustered into five categories. Each category shows a different tendency in terms of accessibility, visibility, and the proportion of public space, and the different spatial configurations and openness somehow reflect the attitude of the research organization or group towards the use of space.KEYWORDS: Scientific research buildingsspace syntaxspatial configurationclustering algorithm Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).","PeriodicalId":48523,"journal":{"name":"Architectural Engineering and Design Management","volume":"15 10","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Architectural Engineering and Design Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2023.2270650","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTSince the nineteenth-century devolution of natural philosophy into disciplines, scientific activity has expanded from single-disciplined research to comprehensive research. The flow of information between different research teams makes scientific research and its places increasingly social, which is no longer limited to the closed laboratory workbench. Reviewing the literature, we found that the development of scientific research buildings experienced a transition from efficiency to openness. And the new organization of research communities and its demand for space put forward higher requirements for scientific research buildings. To deeply explore the design trends of scientific research buildings at this stage, the sample database is established using space syntax and K-means clustering algorithm software to quantitatively analyze spatial layouts of 42 scientific research buildings worldwide from the perspective of sociology and innovation, clustered into five categories. Each category shows a different tendency in terms of accessibility, visibility, and the proportion of public space, and the different spatial configurations and openness somehow reflect the attitude of the research organization or group towards the use of space.KEYWORDS: Scientific research buildingsspace syntaxspatial configurationclustering algorithm Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

查看原文本刊更多论文

科研的空间逻辑:对欧美42栋科研建筑的探索性与定量分析

摘要自19世纪自然哲学向学科转移以来，科学活动从单一学科的研究扩展到综合学科的研究。不同研究团队之间的信息流动使得科学研究及其场所越来越社会化，不再局限于封闭的实验室工作台。回顾文献，我们发现科研建筑的发展经历了从效率到开放的过渡。而新型科研共同体的组织形式及其对空间的需求对科研建筑提出了更高的要求。为深入探讨现阶段科研建筑的设计趋势，运用空间句法和K-means聚类算法软件建立样本数据库，从社会学和创新的角度定量分析全球42座科研建筑的空间布局，将其聚类为5类。每个类别在可达性、可见性、公共空间比例等方面呈现出不同的趋势，不同的空间配置和开放程度在某种程度上反映了研究机构或群体对空间使用的态度。关键词:科研建筑空间句法空间构型聚类算法披露声明作者未发现潜在利益冲突。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Architectural Engineering and Design Management Multiple-

CiteScore

5.80

自引率

3.40%

发文量

期刊介绍： Informative and accessible, this publication analyses and discusses the integration of the main stages within the process of design and construction and multidisciplinary collaborative working between the different professionals involved. Ideal for practitioners and academics alike, Architectural Engineering and Design Management examines specific topics on architectural technology, engineering design, building performance and building design management to highlight the interfaces between them and bridge the gap between architectural abstraction and engineering practice. Coverage includes: -Integration of architectural and engineering design -Integration of building design and construction -Building design management; planning and co-ordination, information and knowledge management, vale engineering and value management -Collaborative working and collaborative visualisation in building design -Architectural technology -Sustainable architecture -Building thermal, aural, visual and structural performance -Education and architectural engineering This journal is a valuable resource for professionals and academics (teachers, researchers and students) involved in building design and construction, including the following disciplines: -Architecture -Building Engineering -Building Service Engineering -Building Physics -Design Management and Design Coordination -Facilities Management Published papers will report on both fundamental research dealing with theoretical work and applied research dealing with practical issues and industrial innovations. In this way, readers explore the interaction between technical considerations and management issues.