Community Partners' Perspectives on Partnering With an Academic Research Team to Promote Disability-inclusive Fitness Programming

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Toni Liechty, Mina Woo, Laura A. Rice, Chung-Yi Chiu, Stacy Kirkpatrick, Kay Hankins, Elsie Hedgspeth, Ashley Nichols, Catherine Porter, Molly Smeltzer, Brynn Adamson
{"title":"Community Partners' Perspectives on Partnering With an Academic Research Team to Promote Disability-inclusive Fitness Programming","authors":"Toni Liechty, Mina Woo, Laura A. Rice, Chung-Yi Chiu, Stacy Kirkpatrick, Kay Hankins, Elsie Hedgspeth, Ashley Nichols, Catherine Porter, Molly Smeltzer, Brynn Adamson","doi":"10.1353/cpr.2023.a907973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Background: Community-based fitness programs can support public health by providing access to physical activity opportunities for a vulnerable population with significant barriers. Unfortunately, programs specifically designed for people with disabilities (PWD) and staff training to promote inclusion for PWD in general population programs is limited. The current study aimed to review an on-going partnership that had formed to address this need. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess community partners' experiences with a community–academic partnership designed to implement a fitness program for people with multiple sclerosis and also to promote inclusion for PWD in community-based fitness programming. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with six community partners who had been engaged in a formal partnership with the academic institution for 2 or more years to understand partners' experiences and perspectives about the partnership. Interviews were audio/video recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed thematically. Results: Participants described their experiences as falling into four main areas. Pre-partnership experiences (or lack thereof) shaped participants views on entering into academic partnerships. Communication and planning for mutual benefit were key to getting the partnership started. Partners identified challenges and factors for success while they were in the thick of partnership activities. Finally, evaluation allowed for assessment and improvement of the partnership itself and its ultimate goals. Conclusions: Findings suggest that academic–community partnerships can be ideal for promoting inclusion for PWD and highlight insights that can be used in the development of future partnerships.","PeriodicalId":46970,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Community Health Partnerships-Research Education and Action","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Community Health Partnerships-Research Education and Action","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cpr.2023.a907973","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Community-based fitness programs can support public health by providing access to physical activity opportunities for a vulnerable population with significant barriers. Unfortunately, programs specifically designed for people with disabilities (PWD) and staff training to promote inclusion for PWD in general population programs is limited. The current study aimed to review an on-going partnership that had formed to address this need. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess community partners' experiences with a community–academic partnership designed to implement a fitness program for people with multiple sclerosis and also to promote inclusion for PWD in community-based fitness programming. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with six community partners who had been engaged in a formal partnership with the academic institution for 2 or more years to understand partners' experiences and perspectives about the partnership. Interviews were audio/video recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed thematically. Results: Participants described their experiences as falling into four main areas. Pre-partnership experiences (or lack thereof) shaped participants views on entering into academic partnerships. Communication and planning for mutual benefit were key to getting the partnership started. Partners identified challenges and factors for success while they were in the thick of partnership activities. Finally, evaluation allowed for assessment and improvement of the partnership itself and its ultimate goals. Conclusions: Findings suggest that academic–community partnerships can be ideal for promoting inclusion for PWD and highlight insights that can be used in the development of future partnerships.
社区合作伙伴与学术研究团队合作促进残障人士健身计划的观点
摘要/ Abstract摘要:背景:基于社区的健身计划可以通过为存在显著障碍的弱势群体提供体育活动机会来支持公共健康。不幸的是,专门为残疾人(PWD)设计的计划和员工培训,以促进残疾人纳入一般人群计划是有限的。目前的研究旨在审查为满足这一需要而形成的持续伙伴关系。目的:本研究的目的是评估社区合作伙伴在社区学术合作伙伴关系中的经验,该合作伙伴关系旨在为多发性硬化症患者实施健身计划,并促进将残疾人纳入社区健身计划。方法:采用半结构化访谈法,对6位与该学术机构建立正式合作关系2年及以上的社区合作伙伴进行访谈,了解合作伙伴的经历和对合作关系的看法。采访录音/录像,逐字抄录,并按主题进行分析。结果:参与者将他们的经历描述为四个主要方面。合作前的经历(或缺乏经历)塑造了参与者对进入学术合作伙伴关系的看法。互利的沟通和计划是建立伙伴关系的关键。合作伙伴在开展合作活动时确定了挑战和成功的因素。最后,通过评价可以评估和改进伙伴关系本身及其最终目标。结论:研究结果表明,学术界与社区的伙伴关系是促进残疾人融入社会的理想选择,并突出了可用于未来伙伴关系发展的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信