Moving From Transactional to Relational: How Funders Can Work in Partnership With Black, Indigenous and People of Color Communities

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Donald Cameron, Hazel Cameron, Jackie An, Michael Byun, Junko Yamazaki, Dominique Davis, Naomi Tagaleo'oa, Liz Huizar, Estela Ortega, Denise Perez Lally, Yusuf Bashir, Abdulahi Osman, Cilia Jurdy, Jaimée Marsh, Emma Catague, Haya Munoza, Kendrick Glover, Ginger Kwan, Joy Sebe, Jennifer Stanton, Josefina Gonzalez, Virgina Herrera-Páramo, CHIMAERA B, Jordan Faralanb, Russell Brooks, Jennifer Castro, Ruel Olanday, Alice Park, Nancy Shore
{"title":"Moving From Transactional to Relational: How Funders Can Work in Partnership With Black, Indigenous and People of Color Communities","authors":"Donald Cameron, Hazel Cameron, Jackie An, Michael Byun, Junko Yamazaki, Dominique Davis, Naomi Tagaleo'oa, Liz Huizar, Estela Ortega, Denise Perez Lally, Yusuf Bashir, Abdulahi Osman, Cilia Jurdy, Jaimée Marsh, Emma Catague, Haya Munoza, Kendrick Glover, Ginger Kwan, Joy Sebe, Jennifer Stanton, Josefina Gonzalez, Virgina Herrera-Páramo, CHIMAERA B, Jordan Faralanb, Russell Brooks, Jennifer Castro, Ruel Olanday, Alice Park, Nancy Shore","doi":"10.1353/cpr.2023.a907974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Background: The Racial Equity Coalition (REC) formed to address persistent educational disparities. The coalition was composed of 14 Black, Indigenous and People of Color (BIPOC) organizations that provide culturally integrative youth services. Objectives: REC, with support from United Way of King County, engaged in participatory research to identify commonalities and shared struggles to inform collective action. Participatory research aligns with REC's commitment to equitable participatory processes. This article focuses on REC's experiences with funders. The objective was to understand what creates positive and challenging experiences with funders, and to identify recommendations for funders to become more culturally responsive. Methods: A research committee was formed including representatives of nine REC organizations and United Way of King County staff. The committee conducted interviews with each of the 14 REC organizations and conducted thematic analysis of interview transcripts. Through participatory analysis, the committee drafted narratives that were further refined through a series of research retreats attended by all REC organizations. Results: Recommendations were to incentivize collaboration, listen to communities to create culturally responsive definitions of success and measurement strategies, arrive at mutually agreed upon approaches with organizations, honor the connections BIPOC organizations have with their communities, and provide unrestricted funding to allow BIPOC organizations greater agency. Conclusions: A major challenge for BIPOC organizations is navigating White dominant culture that too often shows up in funding requirements. Having to fit dominant culture standards stifles BIPOC organizations' abilities to meet community needs and the responsiveness of their approaches. REC identified recommendations for funders to be more culturally responsive and community centered.","PeriodicalId":46970,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Community Health Partnerships-Research Education and Action","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Community Health Partnerships-Research Education and Action","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cpr.2023.a907974","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Background: The Racial Equity Coalition (REC) formed to address persistent educational disparities. The coalition was composed of 14 Black, Indigenous and People of Color (BIPOC) organizations that provide culturally integrative youth services. Objectives: REC, with support from United Way of King County, engaged in participatory research to identify commonalities and shared struggles to inform collective action. Participatory research aligns with REC's commitment to equitable participatory processes. This article focuses on REC's experiences with funders. The objective was to understand what creates positive and challenging experiences with funders, and to identify recommendations for funders to become more culturally responsive. Methods: A research committee was formed including representatives of nine REC organizations and United Way of King County staff. The committee conducted interviews with each of the 14 REC organizations and conducted thematic analysis of interview transcripts. Through participatory analysis, the committee drafted narratives that were further refined through a series of research retreats attended by all REC organizations. Results: Recommendations were to incentivize collaboration, listen to communities to create culturally responsive definitions of success and measurement strategies, arrive at mutually agreed upon approaches with organizations, honor the connections BIPOC organizations have with their communities, and provide unrestricted funding to allow BIPOC organizations greater agency. Conclusions: A major challenge for BIPOC organizations is navigating White dominant culture that too often shows up in funding requirements. Having to fit dominant culture standards stifles BIPOC organizations' abilities to meet community needs and the responsiveness of their approaches. REC identified recommendations for funders to be more culturally responsive and community centered.
从交易到关系:资助者如何与黑人、土著和有色人种社区合作
摘要:背景:种族平等联盟(REC)的成立是为了解决持续存在的教育差异。该联盟由14个黑人、土著和有色人种(BIPOC)组织组成,提供文化融合的青年服务。目标:REC在金县联合劝募会的支持下,从事参与性研究,以确定共性和共同的斗争,为集体行动提供信息。参与性研究符合REC对公平参与性过程的承诺。本文主要介绍REC与资助者打交道的经验。其目的是了解是什么给资助者带来了积极和具有挑战性的体验,并为资助者提出建议,使其更能对文化做出反应。方法:由9个REC组织的代表和金县联合劝募会的工作人员组成一个研究委员会。委员会分别与14个区域中心机构进行了访谈,并对访谈记录进行了专题分析。通过参与式分析,委员会起草了叙述,并通过所有REC组织参加的一系列研究务静会进一步完善。结果:建议鼓励合作,听取社区的意见,以创建符合文化的成功定义和衡量策略,与组织达成共同同意的方法,尊重BIPOC组织与社区的联系,并提供无限制的资金,使BIPOC组织能够发挥更大的作用。结论:BIPOC组织面临的一个主要挑战是如何驾驭白人主导的文化,这种文化经常出现在资金需求中。必须适应主流文化标准扼杀了BIPOC组织满足社区需求和响应其方法的能力。REC为资助者提出了更多的文化响应和社区为中心的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信