Expansion of the Community Engagement Studio Method: Deepening Community Participation in Health Care Innovation

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Carmen R. Valdez, Ricardo Garay, Monique Vasquez, Eliel Oliveira, Vidya Lakshminaraya, Zainab Abdulateef, Monica Guzman, Anjum Khurshid
{"title":"Expansion of the Community Engagement Studio Method: Deepening Community Participation in Health Care Innovation","authors":"Carmen R. Valdez, Ricardo Garay, Monique Vasquez, Eliel Oliveira, Vidya Lakshminaraya, Zainab Abdulateef, Monica Guzman, Anjum Khurshid","doi":"10.1353/cpr.2023.a907981","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Background: The Community Engagement Studio (CE Studio) method has emerged as a valuable model for community participation in health innovation research, and we advance the model by expanding the timing and number of CE Studio sessions, as well as facilitation. Objectives: The authors expanded the CE Studio method first to include five sessions corresponding to five phases of innovation: a) health experiences, b) community readiness, c) design features, d) adoption, and e) sustainability. Community experts were engaged throughout the duration of the research. Second, the authors positioned the CE Studio Team to be deeply embedded within the research team and the community of interest through community health workers. Methods: The expanded CE Studio method was incorporated into a federally funded research project focused on a health technology platform. The CE Studio Team held five sessions with each of four community expert panels (total of 20 sessions) based on race/ethnicity and language: African American, Asian American, English-speaking Latinx, and Spanishspeaking Latinx. Conclusions: CE Studio sessions revealed community experts' shared and unique evolving and deepening perspectives that show promise for expanding the model.","PeriodicalId":46970,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Community Health Partnerships-Research Education and Action","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Community Health Partnerships-Research Education and Action","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cpr.2023.a907981","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Background: The Community Engagement Studio (CE Studio) method has emerged as a valuable model for community participation in health innovation research, and we advance the model by expanding the timing and number of CE Studio sessions, as well as facilitation. Objectives: The authors expanded the CE Studio method first to include five sessions corresponding to five phases of innovation: a) health experiences, b) community readiness, c) design features, d) adoption, and e) sustainability. Community experts were engaged throughout the duration of the research. Second, the authors positioned the CE Studio Team to be deeply embedded within the research team and the community of interest through community health workers. Methods: The expanded CE Studio method was incorporated into a federally funded research project focused on a health technology platform. The CE Studio Team held five sessions with each of four community expert panels (total of 20 sessions) based on race/ethnicity and language: African American, Asian American, English-speaking Latinx, and Spanishspeaking Latinx. Conclusions: CE Studio sessions revealed community experts' shared and unique evolving and deepening perspectives that show promise for expanding the model.
扩展社区参与工作室方法:深化社区参与卫生保健创新
摘要:背景:社区参与工作室(Community Engagement Studio, CE Studio)方法已成为社区参与健康创新研究的一种有价值的模式,我们通过扩大CE工作室会议的时间和数量以及促进来推进该模式。目的:作者首先扩展了CE Studio方法,将五个阶段对应于创新的五个阶段:a)健康经验,b)社区准备,c)设计特征,d)采用和e)可持续性。在整个研究过程中都有社区专家参与。其次,作者将CE工作室团队定位为通过社区卫生工作者深入嵌入研究团队和感兴趣的社区。方法:将扩展的CE Studio方法纳入联邦资助的一项卫生技术平台研究项目。CE工作室团队根据种族/民族和语言(非裔美国人、亚裔美国人、说英语的拉丁裔和说西班牙语的拉丁裔),与四个社区专家小组各举行了五次会议(共20次会议)。结论:CE Studio会议揭示了社区专家分享的、独特的、不断发展和深化的观点,显示了扩展该模型的希望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信