ELIGIBILITY OF BUSINESS METHOD PATENT IN MALAYSIA

Nurul Elliyana Abdul Jamal, Zinatul Ashiqin Zainol, Jady@Zaidi Hassim, Wan Mohd. Hirwani Wan Hussain, Norzalita Abdul Aziz, Nor Akhmal Hasmin
{"title":"ELIGIBILITY OF BUSINESS METHOD PATENT IN MALAYSIA","authors":"Nurul Elliyana Abdul Jamal, Zinatul Ashiqin Zainol, Jady@Zaidi Hassim, Wan Mohd. Hirwani Wan Hussain, Norzalita Abdul Aziz, Nor Akhmal Hasmin","doi":"10.35631/ijlgc.833012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper analyses the patentability of business methods in the United States, United Kingdom, and Malaysia. In order to do this, we compared the existing law, court cases, and government guidelines in respective countries on how they assess the patent application for computer or software operation as a method of doing business in this technological era. Our results showed that business methods were historically not patentable but are now eligible for patentability in some countries. This type of invention could be patented in the United States but not in the United Kingdom and Malaysia. Despite being allowed to be patented in the United States, there are still arguments and development by the Court and the United States Patent & Trademark Office regarding the assessment of the claim. For United Kingdom, despite the exception in United Kingdom Patents Act 1977, a thorough look reveals that business methods are actually eligible for patentability in the United Kingdom but somewhat under stricter legal conditions. As for Malaysia, there is as yet a reported case that has judicially considered the scope of this exclusion but it can be seen that Malaysia also starting to acknowledge the patentability of business methods. This study emphasizes the development of assessing patent applications for the method of doing business invention along with the changes and advancement of these days technology.","PeriodicalId":479515,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Law, Government and Communication","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Law, Government and Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35631/ijlgc.833012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper analyses the patentability of business methods in the United States, United Kingdom, and Malaysia. In order to do this, we compared the existing law, court cases, and government guidelines in respective countries on how they assess the patent application for computer or software operation as a method of doing business in this technological era. Our results showed that business methods were historically not patentable but are now eligible for patentability in some countries. This type of invention could be patented in the United States but not in the United Kingdom and Malaysia. Despite being allowed to be patented in the United States, there are still arguments and development by the Court and the United States Patent & Trademark Office regarding the assessment of the claim. For United Kingdom, despite the exception in United Kingdom Patents Act 1977, a thorough look reveals that business methods are actually eligible for patentability in the United Kingdom but somewhat under stricter legal conditions. As for Malaysia, there is as yet a reported case that has judicially considered the scope of this exclusion but it can be seen that Malaysia also starting to acknowledge the patentability of business methods. This study emphasizes the development of assessing patent applications for the method of doing business invention along with the changes and advancement of these days technology.
马来西亚商业方法专利资格
本文分析了美国、英国和马来西亚的商业方法可专利性。为了做到这一点,我们比较了各自国家现有的法律、法院案件和政府指导方针,以了解它们如何评估计算机或软件操作的专利申请,并将其作为在这个技术时代开展业务的一种方法。我们的研究结果表明,商业方法在历史上是不可专利的,但现在在一些国家有资格获得专利。这种类型的发明可以在美国获得专利,但不能在英国和马来西亚获得专利。尽管在美国被允许申请专利,但法院和美国专利局之间仍有争论和发展。商标局关于索赔的评估。就英国而言,尽管《1977年英国专利法》中有例外,但深入研究就会发现,商业方法在英国实际上是有资格获得可专利性的,只是在更严格的法律条件下。至于马来西亚,迄今为止有一个报道的案例在司法上考虑了这一排除的范围,但可以看出,马来西亚也开始承认商业方法的可专利性。本研究著重于现今科技的变迁与进步,探讨商业发明专利申请评估方法的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信